Taking inclusion back to its roots

Educational Leadership

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 74-77

  Crockett, Jean B ^a   Kauffman, James M ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038903886     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Palmer, D. S., & Lane, K. L. (1996). One size doesn't fit all: Full inclusion and individual differences. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 311-329.
2. Burgdorf, Jr., R. L. (1980). The legal rights of handicapped persons: Cases, materials, and text. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
3. Cook, B. G., Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, M. I. (1997). Reflections on "Are effective schools reforms effective for all students? The implications of joint outcome production for school reform." Exceptionality, 7, 131-137.
4. Crockett, J. B., & Kauffman, J. M. (in press). The least restrictive environment: Its origins and interpretations in special education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Gresham, F. M., & MacMillan, D. R. (1997a). Autistic recovery? An analysis and critique of the empirical evidence on the Early Intervention Project. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 185-201.
6. Gresham, F. M., & MacMillan, D. R. (1997b). Denial and defensiveness in the place of fact and reason: Rejoinder to Smith and Lovaas. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 219-223.
7. Kauffman, J. M. (1997). Caricature, science, and exceptionality. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 130-132.
8. Kauffman, J. M., & Trent, S. C. (1991). Issues in service delivery for students with learning disabilities. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 465-481). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. Kotler, M. A. (1994). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: A parent's perspective and proposal for change. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 27, 331-397.
10. MacMillan, D. L., Gresham, F. M., & Forness, S. R. (1996). Full inclusion: An empirical perspective. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 145-159.
11. Martin, E. W. (1995). Case studies on inclusion: Worst fears realized. The Journal of Special Education, 29(2), 192-199.
12. Meyers, J., Truscott, S., Borelli, C., & Gelzheiser, L. (1997, March). Is special education forgotten in educational reform? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
13. Sack, J. L. (1997, April 16). Disruptive spec. ed. students get own school. Education Week 16(29), 1, 24-25.
14. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1996). Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion, 1958-1995: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 63, 59-74.
15. Smith, T., & Lovaas, O. I. (1997). The UCLA Young Autism Project: A reply to Gresham and MacMillan. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 202-218.
16. The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps (TASH) (1993, February). Resolution on inclusive education (Position paper). Baltimore: Author.
17. Yell, M. L. (1995). Least restrictive environment, inclusion, and students with disabilities: A legal analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 389-404.
18. Yell, M. L. (1998). The law and special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Zigmond, N. (1997). Educating students with disabilities: The future of special education. In J. W. Lloyd, E. J. Kameenui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 370-390). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Zirkel, P. (1996). Inclusion: Return of the pendulum? The Special Educator, 12(9) 1, 5.