What “ref lexivity” is really like

Linguistics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-52

  García, Erica C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038888468     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ling.1996.34.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ariel, Mira (1990). Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
2. Ariel, Mira (1994). Interpreting anaphoric expressions: a cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics 30, 3–42.
3. Baker, C. L. (1995). Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language 71, 63–101.
4. Bertocchi, Alessandra; and Casadio, Claudia (1983). Anaphoric relations, pronouns and Latin complementation. In Latin Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Harm Pinkster (ed.), 27–39. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
5. Bosch, Peter (1983). Agreement and Anaphora. New York: Academic Press.
6. Burzio, Luigi (1991). The morphological basis of anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 27, 81–105.
7. Cantrall, William (1972). Relative identity. Chicago Linguistic Society 8, 22–31.
8. Chomsky, Noam (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
9. Chomsky, Noam (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.
10. Clark, Herbert H.; Schreuder, Robert; and Buttrick, Samuel (1983). Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Language and Verbal Behaviour 22, 245–258.
11. Du Bois, John W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63, 805–855.
12. Evans, Gareth (1980). Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337–362.
13. Fernández, Salvador R. (1951). Gramdtica espafiola. Madrid: Revista de Occidente. Franks, Steven; and Schwartz, Linda (1994). Binding and non-distinctness: a reply to Burzio. Journal of Linguistics 30, 227–243.
14. Garcìa, Erica C. (1975). The Role of Theory in Linguistic Analysis: The Spanish Pronoun System. Amsterdam: North Holland.
15. Garcìa, Erica C. (1982). Evidencia del carácter no reflejo de si. In Adas del VII Congreso de la Asociacidn Internacional de Hispanistas, Giuseppe Bellini (ed.), 467–474. Rome: Bulzoni.
16. Garcìa, Erica C. (1983). Context-dependence of language and of linguistic analysis. In Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, Flora Klein-Andreu (ed.), 181–207. New York: Academic Press.
17. Garcìa, Erica C. (1984). Het Spaanse sí: een wederkerende nachtmerrie? Glot 7, 51–61.
18. Garcìa, Erica C. (1985). Quantity into quality: synchronic indeterminacy and language change. Lingua 65, 275–306.
19. Garcìa, Erica C. (1985). Shifting variation. Lingua 67, 189–224.
20. Garcìa, Erica C. (1986). Coherencia textual: prueba para y del analisis lingüístico. In Actes du 9° Congrès des Romanistes Scandinaves, Elina Suomela-Härmä and Olli Välikangas (eds.), 71–80. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
21. Garcìa, Erica C. (1986). Reflexivity turned back on itself. In Studies in Romance Linguistics, Osvaldo A. Jaeggli and Carmen Silva-Corvalán (eds.), 61–73. Dordrecht: Foris.
22. Garcìa, Erica C. (1986). The case of Spanish gender. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 87, 165–184.
23. Garcìa, Erica C. (1988). Lingüística cartesiana o el método del discurso. Lenguage en Contexto 1, 5–36.
24. Garcìa, Erica C. (1990). A psycho-linguistic crossroads: frequency of use. Journal of Semantics 7, 301–319.
25. Garcìa, Erica C. (1991). Grasping the nettle: variation as proof of invariance. In New Vistas in Grammar: Invariance and Variation, Linda R. Waugh and Stephen Rudy (eds.), 33–59. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
26. Garcìa, Erica C. (i.p.).Grasping the invisible hand. In Language Change and Functionalism, Jadranka Gvozdanović (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
27. Gessner, Emil (1893). Das Spanische personal pronomen. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 17, 1–54.
28. Giorgi, Alessandra (1984). Toward a theory of long distance anaphors: a GB approach. Linguistic Review 3, 307–361.
29. Grodzinsky, Yosef; and Reinhart, Tanya (1993). The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 69–101.
30. Hankamer, Jorge; and Sag, Ivan (1976). Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 391–426.
31. Hellan, Lars (1991). Containment and connectedness anaphors. In Long Distance Anaphora, Jan Koster and Eric Reuland (eds.), 27–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Hirst, Graeme (1981). Discourse-oriented anaphora resolution in natural language understanding: a review. American Journal of Computational Linguistics 7, 85–98.
33. Hobbs, Jerry R. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3, 67–90.
34. Hopper, Paul (1988). Emergent grammar and the a priori grammar postulate. In Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 117–134. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
35. Hörmann, Hans (1983). The calculating listener, or, How many are einige, mehrere and ein paar (some, several, and a few)? In Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, Rainer Bäuerle et al. (eds.), 221–234. Berlin: de Gruyter.
36. Huang, Yan (1991). A neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 27, 301–335.
37. Jensen, John B. (1973). The feature [+ Human] as a constraint on the occurrence of third-person subject pronouns in Spanish. Hispania 56, 116–122.
38. Komisarjevsky-Tyler, Lorraine (1989). Lexical representations in language comprehension. In Lexical Representation and Process, William Marslen-Wilson (ed.), 439–462. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Köpcke. Klaus-Michael; and Panther, Klaus-Uwe (1991). Kontrolle und Kontrollwechsel im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 44, 143–166.
40. Levinson, Stephen C. (1991). Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 21,107–161.
41. MacLaury, Robert E. (1991). Social and cognitive motivations of change: measuring variability in color semantics. Language 61, 34–62.
42. Mariner, Sebastián (1973). Situación del neutro románico en la oposición genérica. Revista Española de Lingüística 3, 23–28.
43. Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1992). Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68, 756–796.
44. Omena, Nelize (1981). Pronom personnel de la troisième personne: ses formes variantes en fonction accusative. In Variation Omnibus, David SankofFand Henrietta Cedergren (eds.), 343–350. Carbondale, IL: Linguistic Research.
45. Ortega y Gasset, José (1947). Obras completas, vol. 4. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.
46. Ortega y Gasset, José (1957). Elhombreyla gente. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.
47. Otero, Carlos P. (1969). The syntax of mismo. In Actes du X° Congrès International des Linguistes, A. Graur (ed.), vol. 2, 1145–1150. Bucharest.
48. Pereira, Eduardo C. (1918). Grammatica Expositiva. Cur so Superior, 8th ed. Sao Paulo.
49. Pollard, Carl; and Sag, Ivan A. (1992). Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 23, 173–234.
50. Reinhart, Tanya; and Reuland, Eric (1991). Anaphors and logophors: an argument structure perspective. In Long-Distance Anaphora, Jan Koster and Eric Reuland (eds.), 283–322. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Rommetveit, Ragnar (1988). On pronomes, pronouns and dyadic coordination of attention. Journal ofSemantics 5, 177–179.
52. Ruwet, Nicolas (1990). En et y: deux clitiques pronominaux anti-logophoriques. Langages 97, 51–81.
53. Ruwet, Nicolas (1991). A propos de la grammaire générative. Histoire, épistémologie, langage 13, 109–132.
54. Sells, Peter (1987). Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 445–479.
55. Sidner, Candace L. (1983). Focusing in the comprehension of definite anaphora. In Computational Models of Discourse, Michael Brady and Robert C. Berwick (eds.), 267–330. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Siegel, Sidney; and Castellan, N. John (1988). Non Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
57. Smith, Neil; and Wilson, Deirdre (1979). Modern Linguistics: The Results of Chomsky's Revolution. Brighton: Harvester.
58. Smyth, Ronald H. (1986). Cognitive Aspects of Anaphora Judgment and Resolution. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
59. Stenning, Keith (1978). Anaphora as an approach to pragmatics. In Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, Morris Halle et al. (eds.), 162–200. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Thráinsson, Höskuldur (1991). Long-distance reflexives and the typology of NPs. In Long-.
61. Tomlin, Russell S.; and Pu, Ming M. (1991). The management of reference in Mandarin discourse. Cognitive Linguistics 2, 65–93.
62. Ward, Gregory; Sproat, Richard; and McKoon, Gail (1991). A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands. Language 67, 439–473.
63. Wasow, Thomas (1979). Anaphora in Generative Grammar. Ghent: Story-Scientia.
64. Werth, Paul (1984). Focus, Coherence and Emphasis. London: Croom Helm. Wilkins, Wendy (1988). Thematic structure and reflexivization. In Thematic Relations, Wendy Wilkins (ed.), 191–213. New York: Academic Press.
65. Zribi-Hertz, Anne (1989). Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse. Language 65, 695–727.
66. Zribi-Hertz, Anne (i.p.). Les pronoms reéfléchis: universaux et typologie. In Structure de la phrase et theorie du liage, Hans-Georg Obenauer and Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds.). Saint Denis: PUV.