Does the world need additional uniform legislation on arbitration?: The 1998 freshfields lecture

Arbitration International

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 211-236

  Herrmann, Gerold ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038882831     PISSN: 09570411     EISSN: 18758398     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/arbitration/15.3.211     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. B. Harris, R. Planterose and J. Tecks, The Arbitration Act 1996-A Commentary (1996) at p. 1
2. Shilston, 'A View from the 1982 Annual Conference of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators' in (1983) 49 Arbitration 291 at pp. 291-292
3. Herrmann, 'The UNCITRAL Arbitration Law: a Good Model of a Model Law' in (1998) Uniform Law Review at p. 483
4. Lord Mustill, 'The GoffLecture, Hong Kong 1996-Too Many Laws' in (1997) 63 Arbitration 248 at p.257
5. http://www.un.or.at/uncitral
6. Kaplan, 'Is the Need for Writing as Expressed in the New York Convention and the Model Law Out of Step with Commercial Practice?' in (1996) 12 Arbitration International 27 at pp. 44-45
7. Kaplan, 'The Model Law in Hong Kong' in CIETAC/ICCA Papers on International Commercial Arbitration (Arbitration Research Institute China Chamber of International Commerce 1997) 495 at p. 510
8. W. L. Craig, W. W. Park and J. Paulsson, International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration. Herrmann, 'The Arbitration Agreement as the Foundation of Arbitration and Its Recognition by the Courts' in ICCA Congress Series No. 6 (ICCA Bahrain Conference 1993) p. 41 at pp. 45-46
9. Chiasson, 'A Precipice Avoided: Judicial Stays and Party Autonomy in International Arbitration' in (1996) 54 The Advocate 63 at p. 70 (n. 35)
10. L' Delvolve, 'Third parties and the arbitration agreement', supra n. 5, p. 19 at p. 20
11. A. J. van den Berg, The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958 (Kluwer 1981) at pp. 178-180
12. A. J. van den Berg, 'The New York Convention: Its Intended Effects, Its Interpretation, Salient Problem Areas,' in (1996) ASA Special Series No. 9, p. 25 at pp. 44-45
13. 'Enforcement of Annulled Awards?' in (1998) 9 ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin 15 at p. 18
14. Altaro and Guiamarey, 'Who Should Determine Arbitrability? Arbitration in a Changing Economic and Political Environment' in (1996) 12 Arbitration International 415 at p. 427
15. Kerr, 'Concord and Conflict in International Arbitration' in (1997) 13 Arbitration International 121 at pp. 13.5-136
16. Berger, 'Die Aufrechnung im Internationalen Schiedsverfahren' in 1998 Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft 426
17. Griffith, 'Possible issues for an annex to the UNCITRAL Model Law', supra n. 5, p. 46 at p. 48
18. J. D. M. Lew (ed.) The Immunity of Arbitrators (Lloyd's of London Press 1990)
19. Hausmaninger, 'Civil Liability of Arbitrators-Comparative Analysis and Proposals for Reform' in (1990) 7 Journal of International Arbitration 7
20. Herrmann, 'Conciliation as a new method of dispute setdement' in ICCA Congress Series No. 1 (Vlldi International Arbitration Congress, Hamburg 1982) 145 at p. 165
21. Melis, 'Considering the advisability of preparing an additional Convention, complementary to the New York Convention', supra n., 5, p. 44 at pp. 45-46
22. Blessing, 'The Trouble With Interim Relief in International Arbitration', AAA/ABCNY/IBA International Arbitration Day: Global Perspectives, New York, 25 September 1997
23. Herrmann, 'For an UNCITRAL Model Restatement of Arbitration Law in the United Kingdom' in (1988) 4 Arbitration International 62 at p. 66
24. Herrmann, 'Implementing Legislation-The IBA/UNCITRAL Project' in (1996) ASA Special Series No. 9 135
25. van den Berg, 'The Freshfields Lecture 1992-The Efficacy of Award in International Commercial Arbitration' in (1992) 58 Arbitration 267 at p. 272
26. Fouchard, 'Suggestions to Improve the International Efficacy of Arbitral Awards', supra n. 4, p. 601 at p. 613
27. Fox, 'State Immunity and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards: Do We Need an UNCITRAL Model Law Mark II for Execution Against State Property ?' in (1996) 12 Arbitration International 89
28. Dowling Daley, Traditional Irish Laws (San Francisco 1998) at pp. 4 and 23