Group harmony and interpersonal fairness in reward allocation: On the loci of the moderation effect

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 158-183

  Singh, Ramadhar ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038877031     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2740     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adams J. S. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology. 1965;Academic Press, New York. p. 267-299.
2. Anderson N. H. Equity judgments as information integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 33:1976;291-299.
3. Anderson N. H. Foundations of information integration theory. 1981;Academic Press, New York.
4. Anderson N. H. Methods of information integration theory. 1982;Academic Press, New York.
5. Anderson N. H. Ratio models of equity and inequity: Comment on Mellers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 112:1983;513-515.
6. Anderson N. H. Moral-social development. Anderson N. H. Contributions to information integration theory. 1991;137-187 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
7. Anderson N. H. A functional theory of cognition. 1996;Erlbaum, Mahwah.
8. Anderson N. H., Butzin C. A. Integration theory applied to children's judgments of equity. Developmental Psychology. 14:1978;593-606.
9. Anderson N. H., Farkas A. J. Integration theory applied to models of inequity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1:1975;588-591.
10. Birnbaum M. H. The nonadditivity of personality impressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 102:1974;543-561.
11. Birnbaum M. H. Differences and ratios in psychological measurement. Castellan N. J., Restle F. Cognitive theory. 1978;33-74 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
12. Birnbaum M. H. Controversies in psychological measurement. Wagner B. Social attitudes and psychological measurement. 1982;401-485 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
13. Bond M. H., Leung K., Wan C. K. How does cultural collectivism operate? The impact of task and maintenance contributions on reward distribution. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 13:1982;33-56.
14. Cohen J. Statistical power analyses for behavioral sciences. 1988;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
15. Emerson J. D., Stoto M. A. Transforming data. Hoaglin D. C., Mosteller F., Tukey J. W. Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis. 1983;97-128 Wiley, New York.
16. Farkas A. J. Cognitive algebra of interpersonal unfairness. Anderson N. H. Contributions to information integration theory. 1991;43-99 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
17. Farkas A. J., Anderson N. H. Multidimensional input in equity theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37:1979;879-896.
18. Hook J. The development of equity and logico-mathematical thinking. Child Development. 49:1978;1035-1044.
19. Hook J. G., Cook T. D. Equity theory and the cognitive ability of children. Psychological Bulletin. 86:1979;429-445.
20. Hui C. H., Triandis H. C., Yee C. Cultural differences in reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation? British Journal of Social Psychology. 30:1991;145-157.
21. Kim K. I., Park H., Suzuki N. Reward allocations in the United States, Japan, and Korea: A comparison of individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Academy of Management Journal. 33:1990;188-198.
22. Kruskal J. B., Carmone F. L. MONANOVA: A FORTRAN IV program for monotone analysis of variance. Behavioral Science. 14:1969;165-166.
23. Lerner M. J. The justice motive: "Equity" and "parity" among children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 29:1974;539-550.
24. Leung K., Bond M. H. The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 47:1984;793-804.
25. Leung K., Park H. Effects of interactional goal on choice of allocation rules: A cross-national study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 37:1986;111-120.
26. Leventhal G. S. The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. Berkowitz L., Walster E. Advances in experimental social psychology. 1976;91-131 Academic Press, New York.
27. Leventhal G. S., Anderson D. Self-interest and the maintenance of equity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 15:1970;57-62.
28. Leventhal G. S., Lane L. Sex, age, and equity behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 15:1970;312-316.
29. Leventhal G. S., Michaels J. W., Sanford C. Inequity and interpersonal conflict: Reward allocation and secrecy about rewards as methods of preventing conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 23:1972;88-102.
30. Martin J. Inequality, distributive injustice, and organizational illegitimacy. Murnighan J. K. Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research. 1993;296-321 Prentice-Hall, Englewoods Cliffs.
31. Mellers B. A. Equity judgment: A revision of Aristotelian views. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 111:1982;242-270.
32. Mellers B. A. A reconsideration of two-person inequity judgment: A reply to Anderson. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 114:1985;514-520.
33. Mellers B. A., Hartka E. Test of a subtractive theory of "fair" allocations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 56:1989;691-697.
34. Mikula G. Nationality, performance, and sex as determinants of reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 29:1974;435-440.
35. Moore C. F., Hembree S. E., Enright R. D. The unfolding of justice: A developmental perspective on reward allocation. Mellers B., Baron J. Psychological perspectives on justice. 1993;183-204 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
36. Murphy-Berman V., Berman J. J., Singh P., Pachauri A., Kumar P. Factor affecting allocation to needy and meritorious recipients: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 46:1984;1267-1272.
37. Shapiro E. G. Effects of expectations of future interaction on reward allocations by dyads: Equity or equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 31:1975;873-880.
38. Singh R. Leadership style and reward allocation: Does least preferred co-worker scale measure task and relation orientation? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 32:1983;187-197.
39. Singh R. A test of the relative ratio model of reward division with students and managers in India. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs. 111:1985;363-384.
40. Singh R. "Fair" allocations of pay and workload: Tests of a subtractive model with nonlinear judgment function. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 62:1995;70-78.
41. Singh R. Subtractive versus ratio model of "fair" allocation: Can the group level analyses be misleading. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 68:1996;123-144.
42. Singh R., Chong S. S. K., Leow H. C., Tan R. C. H. Age and cultural differences in "fair" allocation: On the consequences of nonlinear judgment function. November, 1996;Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
43. Singh R., Huang A. S. T. Loci of age effects in "fair" allocations. Asian Journal of Psychology. 1:1993;36-44.
44. Sinha K. K. Developmental trends in distributive justice: An information integration analysis. 1985;University of Bihar, Muzaffarpur.
45. Surber C. F. Issues in using quantitative rating scales in developmental research. Psychological Bulletin. 95:1984;226-246.
46. Walster E., Berscheid E., Walster G. W. New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 25:1973;151-176.