The clash of social categories: What egalitarianism in networked writing classrooms?

Computers and Composition

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 257-268

  Castner, Joanna A ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication, computer based; Composition theory; Egalitarianism; Networked classroom; Social identity theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038875713     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S8755-4615(97)90026-8     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barker Thomas T., Kemp Fred O. Network theory: A postmodern pedagogy for the writing classroom. Handa Carolyn. computers and community. 1990;1-27 Boynton/Cook, Portsmouth, NH.
2. Berlin James. Rhetoric and ideology in the writing class. College English. 50:1988;477-494.
3. Berlin James. Postmodernism, the college curriculum, and composition. Winterowd W. Ross, Gillespie Vincent. Composition in context. 1994;46-61 Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL.
4. Billig Michael G., Tajfel Henri. Social categorisation and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology. 3:1973;27-52.
5. Brown Rupert J., Turner John C. Interpersonal and intergroup behaviour. Turner John C., Giles Howard. Intergroup behaviour. 1981;33-65 University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
6. Bruffee Kenneth A. Collaborative learning and the 'conversation of mankind.'. College English. 46:(7):1984;635-652.
7. Bump Jerome. Radical changes in class discussion using networked computers. Computers and the Humanities. 24:1990;49-65.
8. Cooper Marilyn M., Selfe Cynthia L. Computer conferences and learning: Authority,resistance, and internally persuasive discourse. College English. 52:(8):1990;847-869.
9. Doosje Bertjan, Ellemers Naomi, Spears Russell. Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 31:1995;410-436.
10. Eichhorn Jill, Farris Sara, Hayes Karen, Hernandez Adriana, Jarratt Susan C., Powers-Stubbs Karen, Sciachitano Marian M. A symposium on feminist experiences in the composition classroom. College Composition and Communication. 43:(3):1992;297-322.
11. Faigley Lester. Subverting the electronic workbook: Teaching writing using networked computers. Daiken Donald A., Morenberg Max. The writing teacher as researcher: Essays in the theory and practice of class-based research. 1990;290-311 Boynton/Cook, Portsmouth, NH.
12. Gruber Sibylle. Re: Ways we contribute: Students, instructors, and pedagogies in the computer-mediated writing classroom. Computers and Composition. 12:(1):1995;61-78.
13. Haslam S. Alexander, Oakes Penelope J., McGarty Craig, Turner John C., Reynolds Katherine J., Eggins Rachael A. Stereotyping and social influence: The mediation of stereotype applicability and sharedness by the views of in-group and out-group members. British Journal of Social Psychology. 35:1996;369-397.
14. Haslam S. Alexander, Oakes Penelope J., Turner John C., McGarty Craig. Social categorization and group homogeneity: Changes in the perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trai. British Journal of Social Psychology. 34:1995;139-160.
15. Jarratt Susan C. Feminism and composition: The case for conflict. Harkin Patricia, Schilb John. Contending with words: Composition in a postmodern era. 1991;105-125 MLA, New York.
16. Kremers Marshall. Sharing authority on a synchronous network: The case for riding the beast. Computers and Composition. 7:1990;33-44.
17. Mountford Roxanne. Classrooms as communities: At what cost? The things that go without saying in composition studies: A colloquy. Shamoon Linda K., Wall Beverly. Journal of Advanced Composition. 15:1995;281-320. (2).
18. Regan Alison. "Type normal like the rest of us": Writing, power, and homophobia in the networked composition classroom. Computers and Composition. 10:(4):1993;11-23.
19. Romano Susan. The egalitarianism narrative: Whose story? Which yardstick? Computers and Composition. 10:(3):1993;5-28.
20. Tajfel Henri, Turner John C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Worchel Stephen, Austin William G. Psychology of intergroup relations. 1986;7-24 Nelson-Hall, Chicago.
21. Tajfel Henry, Flament C., Billig M.G., Bundy R.F. Social categorisation and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1:1971;149-177.
22. Takayoshi Pamela. Building new networks from the old: Women's experiences with electronic communications. Computers and Composition. 11:(1):1994;21-35.
23. Trimbur John. Consensus and difference in collaborative learning. College English. 51:1989;602-616.
24. Turner John C. The experimental social psychology of intergroup behaviour. Turner John C., Giles Howard. Intergroup behaviour. 1981;66-101 University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
25. Turner John C. Social influence. 1991;Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA.
26. Warshauer Susan Claire. Rethinking teacher authority to counteract homophobic prejudice in the networked classroom: A model of teacher response and overview of classroom metho. Computers and Composition. 12:(1):1995;97-111.
27. Webb Mark Owen. Feminist epistemology and the extent of the social. Hypatia. 10:(3):1995;85-98.
28. Worchel Stephen. The role of co-operation in reducing intergroup conflict. Worchel Stephen, Austin William G. Psychology of intergroup relations. 1986;288-304 Nelson-Hall, Chicago.