How innovative are Dutch immigrant entrepreneurs?: Constructing a framework of assessment

International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research

Volumn 8, Issue , 2002, Pages 69-92

  Engelen, Ewald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Entrepreneurialism; Immigrants; Innovation; Start ups; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038820135     PISSN: 13552554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13552550210423732     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. Aoki, M. and Rosenberg, N. (1987), “The Japanese firm as an innovative institution”, unpublished paper, Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
2. Bader, V.M. and Engelen, E.R. (2001), “Taking pluralism seriously. Arguing for an institutionalist turn in political philosophy”, unpublished paper, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
3. Barber, B. (1983), The Logic and Limits of Trust, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
4. Bechhofer, F. and Elliott, B. (1985), “The petite bourgeoisie in late capitalism”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 11, pp. 181-207.
5. Bemelmans-Videc, M., Rist, R. and Vedung, E. (1998), Carrots, Sticks and Sermons. Policy Instruments and their Evaluation, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.
6. Beyer, J. and Hassel, A. (2001), “‘The market for corporate control and the financial internationalization of German firms”, paper presented at the 13th Annual Meeting on Socio-Economics, Amsterdam, 28 June-1 July.
7. Brenner, R. (1977), “The origins of capitalist development. A critique of neo-Smithian Marxism”, New Left Review, Vol. 104, pp. 25-92.
8. CPB (Centraal Planbureau) (1997), Challenging Neighbours. Rethinking German and Dutch Economic Institutions, CPB, Springer, Berlin.
9. Campbell, J.L., Hollingsworth, J.R. and Lindberg, L.N. (Eds) (1991), Governance of the American Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Chandler, A. (1966), Strategy and Structure. Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise, Anchor Books, New York, NY.
11. Chandler, A. (1979), The Visible Hand. The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Chandler, A. (1990), Scale and Scope. The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Cooke, P. and Morgan, K. (1998), The Associational Economy. Firms, Regions, and Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. Deeg, R. (1999), Finance Capitalism Unveiled. Banks and German Political Economy, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
15. de Haan, I. (2001), “Tocqueville in Nederland. Verzuiling, democratie en sociale cohesie in de Nederlandse geschiedenis”.
16. de Jong, H.W. (1990), “Nederland: het kartelparadijs van Europa?”, Economisch Statistische Berichten, Vol. 72, pp. 192-7.
17. de Jong, H.W. (1992), “Het kartelparadijs: de punten van bezwaar”, Economisch Statistische Berichten, Vol. 77, pp. 244-8.
18. Dhondt, S. and Vaas, F. (1996), Innovatie en arbeid. Een onderzoek naar de synergie tussen kwaliteit van de arbeid en het innovatievermogen van bedrijven, VUGA Den Haag.
19. Dick, A. (1997), “If cartels were legal, would firms fix prices?”, US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Washington, DC.
20. EZ (Economische Zaken) (1999), De ondernemende samenleving. Meer kansen, minder belemmeringen voor ondernemerschap, EZ, Den Haag.
21. Edquist, C. (Ed.) (1997), Systems of innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter, New York, NY.
22. Engelen, E.R. (2000), Economisch burgerschap in de onderneming. Een oefening in concreet utopisme, Thela thesis, Amsterdam.
23. Engelen, E.R. (2001a), Zeggenschap in Nederland. Economisch burgerschap in de 21ste eeuw, Samson, Alphen a/d Rijn.
24. Engelen, E.R. (2001b), “Beleid ten aanzien van ondernemerschap in het algemeen en etnisch ondernemerschap in het bijzonder in Nederland. Een inventarisatie”, unpublished paper.
25. Freeman, C. (1994), “The economics of technical change”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, pp. 463-514.
26. Froschauer, K. (1997), “East Asian immigrant entrepreneurs in Vancouver: provincial preference and ethnic strategy”, Zeitschrift für Kanada-Studien, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 93-114.
27. Froschauer, K. (2001), “East Asian and European entrepreneur immigrants in British Columbia, Canada: post-migration conduct and premigration context”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 225-40.
28. Herrigel, G. (1996), Industrial Constructions. The Sources of German Industrial Power, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Kenney, M. (2000), “A note on the comparison between Cambridge, England and Silicon Valley”, BRIE Research Note No. 6.
30. Kenney, M. (Ed.) (2001), Understanding Silicon Valley. The Anatomy of An Entrepreneurial Region, Stanford Business Books, Stanford.
31. Kleinknecht, A. (1998), “Is labour market flexibility harmful to innovation?”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 22, pp. 387-96.
32. Kleinknecht, A. and Naastepad, C. (2001a), “Industrie- en dienstenbeleid: een dwaalspoor? Een reactie”, Tijdschrift voor Politieke Ekonomie, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 58-70.
33. Kleinknecht, A. and Naastepad, C. (2001b), “Zonder loonmatiging hogere arbeidsproductiviteit en meer kwaliteit”, CDV themanummer 2001 Werk, Welvaart en Geluk, Vol. 7/8/9, pp. 33-40.
34. Kline, S. and Rosenberg, N. (1986), “An overview of innovation”, in Landau, R. and Rosenberg, N. (Eds), The Positive Sum Strategy, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 275-305.
35. Kloosterman, R. (2001), “Mixed embeddedness and postfordist opportunity structure. Migrant entrepreneurs in Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague, and Utrecht”, paper presented at the ISA Conference, Amsterdam, 15-17 June.
36. Kloosterman, R. and Rath, J. (2000), “Mixed embeddedness. Markets and immigrant entrepreneurs. Towards a framework for comparative research”, paper presented at the 3rd TSER Working on the Fringes Conference, Jerusalem, 17-20 June.
37. Lane, C. (1988), “Industrial change in Europe. The pursuit of flexible specialization in Britain and West Germany”, Work, Employment & Society, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 141-68.
38. Lane, C. (2000), “Globalization and the German model of capitalism – erosion or survival?”, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 207-34.
39. Lazonick, W. (2000), “From innovative enterprise to national institutions. A theoretical perspective on the governance of economic development”, available at: www.insead.fr/cgep
40. Lazonick, W. and O'sullivan, M. (2000a), “Maximizing shareholder value. A new ideology for corporate governance”, Economy & Society, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 13-35.
41. Lazonick, W. and O'sullivan, M. (2000b), “Perspectives on corporate governance, innovation and economic performance”, available at: www.insead.fr/cgep
42. Lipietz, A. (1986), Mirages et miracles. Problème de l’industrialisation dans le tiers monde, La Découverte, Paris.
43. Lundvall, B.A. (Ed.) (1992), National Systems of Innovation, Pinter, London.
44. Marglin, S. (1990), “Losing touch. The cultural conditions of worker accomodation and resistance”, in Marglin, F. and Marglin, S. (Eds), Dominating Knowledge, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 217-82.
45. NCB (Nederlands Centrum Buitenlanders) (2000), De Gids. Organisaties, projecten en initiatieven op het gebied allochtoon ondernemerschap in Nederland, NCB, Utrecht.
46. Nelson, R. (Ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
47. North, D.C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
48. North, D.C. and Thomas, R.P. (1973), The Rise of the Western World. A New Economic History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
49. O'sullivan, M. (2000a), Contests for Corporate Control. Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
50. O'sullivan, M. (2000b), “The innovative enterprise and corporate governance”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 393-416.
51. OECD (1998), Fostering Entrepeneurship, OECD, Paris.
52. Prak, M. (1999), Republikeinse veelheid, democratisch enkelvoud. Sociale verandering in het revolutietijdvak. ‘s-Hertogenbosch 1770-1820, SUN, Nijmegen.
53. Piore, M. and Sabel, C. (1984), The Second Industrial Divide. Possibilities for Prosperity, Basic Books, New York, NY.
54. Polanyi, M. (1969), Knowing and Being, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
55. Reynolds, P.D., Hay, M., Bygrave, W.D., Camp, S.M. and Autio, E. (2000), Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2000 Executive Report, available at: www.entreworld.org
56. Roobeek, A. (1988), Een race zonder finish. De rol van de overheid in de technologiewedloop, VU Uitgeverij, Amsterdam.
57. SCP (Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau) (1998), Sociaal en Cultureel Rapport 1998. 25 jaar sociale verandering, SCP, Den Haag.
58. Sabel, C. and Zeitlin, J. (1985), “Historical alternatives to mass production. Politics, markets and technology in nineteenth-century industrialization”, Past & Present, Vol. 108, pp. 133-76.
59. Saxenian, A. (1995), Regional Advantage. Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
60. Schumpeter, J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
61. Schumpeter, J. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Allen & Unwin, London.
62. Scott, J. (1997), Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
63. Scott, J.A. (1998), Seeing Like a State. How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
64. Semlinger, K. (1995), “Industrial policy and small-firm cooperation in Baden-Württemberg”, in Bagnasco, A. and Sabel, C. (Eds), Small and Medium-size Enterprises, Pinter, London, pp. 15-30.
65. Soskice, D. (1994), “ Finer varieties of advanced capitalism. Industry versus group based coordination in Germany and Japan”, paper presented to the conference on Varieties of Capitalism, Poitiers.
66. Soskice, D. (1999), “Divergent production regimes. Coordinated and uncoordinated market economies in the 1980s and 1990s”, in Kitschelt, H., Lange, P., Marks, G. and Stephens, J. (Eds), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 101-34.
67. Soskice, D. and Hall, P. (2001), Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
68. Steinmetz, G. and Wright, E.O. (1989), “The fall and rise of the petty bourgeoisie: changing patterns of self-employment in the postwar United States”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94 No. 5, pp. 973-1018.
69. Swedberg, R. (1991), Joseph Schumpeter. A Biography, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
70. Vaas, F. (2001), “Arbeidsproductiviteit verhogen, door slim organiseren”, CDV themanummer 2001 Werk, Welvaart en Geluk, Vol. 7/8/9, pp. 26-32.
71. van der Leun, J. and Rusinovic, K. (2001), “Mixed embeddedness of immigrant entrepreneurs in a booming sector in two Dutch cities”, paper presented at the ISA Conference, Amsterdam, 17 June.
72. van den Tillaart, H. (2001), Monitor etnisch ondernemerschap. Zelfstandig ondernemerschap van etnische minderheden in Nederland in de periode 1990-2000, ITS, Nijmegen.
73. van den Tillaart, H. and Poutsma, E. (1998), Een factor van betekenis. Zelfstandig ondernemerschap van allochtonen in Nederland, ITS, Nijmegen.
74. van Iterson, A. (1997a), “The development of national governance principles in The Netherlands”, Whitley, R. and Kristensen, P. H. (Eds) (1997), Governance at Work. The Social Regulation of Economic Relations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 49-61.
75. van Iterson, A. (1997b), “The development of national governance principles in The Netherlands”, NIBOR, Maastricht, available at: www.unimaas.nl/∼document/fdewb.htm
76. van Iterson, A. (1997c), “Sector, firm and management performace in The Netherlands. The role of national governance and institutions”, NIBOR, Maastricht, available at: www.unimaas.nl/∼document/fdewb.htm
77. van Iterson, A. (2001), “Rules of action in Dutch work organizations”, The Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 176-87.
78. van Iterson, A. and Olie, R. (1992), “ European business systems. The Dutch case”, in Whitley, R. (Ed.), European Business Systems. Firms and Markets in their National Contexts, Sage, London, pp. 98-116.
79. van Lieshout, H. (1996), Beroepsonderwijs in Duitsland. Een analyse van het Duitse duale stelsel van beroepsonderwijs vanuit Nederlands perspectief, Max Goote Knowledge Center for Vocational Training and Adult Education, Amsterdam.
80. van Zanden, J.L. and van Riel, A. (2000), Nederland 1780-1914. Staat, instituties en economische ontwikkeling, Uitgeverij Balans, Utrecht.
81. Visser, J. (1992), “The strength of union movements in advanced capitalist democracies. Social and organizational variations”, in Regini, M. (Ed.), Future of Labour Movements, Sage, London.
82. Visser, J. (1995), “The Netherlands. From paternalism to representation”, in Rogers, J. and Streeck, W. (Eds), Works Councils. Consultation, Representation and Cooperation in Industrial Relations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 79-114.
83. Visser, J. and Ebbinghaus, B. (1996), “Een halve eeuw verandering. Verklaringen voor convergentie en diversiteit van werknemersorganisaties in West-Europa”, in Visser, J. (Ed.), De vakbeweging op de eeuwgrens. Vijf sociologische studies over de vakbeweging, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp. 20-53.
84. Visser, J. and Hemerijck, A. (1997), A Dutch Miracle. Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in The Netherlands, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
85. Weiss, L. (1988), Creating Capitalism. The State and Small Business since 1945, Blackwell, Oxford.
86. Whitley, R. (1999), Divergent Capitalisms, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
87. Whitley, R. (2000), “The institutional structuring of innovation strategies. Business systems, firm types and patterns of technical change in different market economies”, Organization Studies, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 855-86.
88. Whitley, R. (Ed.) (1992), European Business Systems. Firms and Markets in their National Contexts, Sage, London.
89. Whitley, R. and Kristensen, P.H. (Eds) (1996), The Changing European Firm. Limits to Convergence, Routledge, London/New York, NY.
90. Whitley, R. and Kristensen, P.H. (Eds) (1997), Governance at Work. The Social Regulation of Economic Relations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
91. Young, B. (1991), “The dairy industry. From yeomanry to the institutionalization of multilateral governance”, in Campbell, J.L., Hollingsworth, J.R. and Lindberg, L.N. (Eds), Governance of the American Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 236-58.