Prediction of crushing behaviour of honeycomb structures

International Journal of Crashworthiness

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 229-235

  Chawla, A ^a   Mukherjee, S ^a   Kumar, D ^b   Nakatani, T ^c   Ueno, M ^c  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

^b Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory   (India)

^c JAPAN AUTOMOBILE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Crushing Behaviour; Dynamic modelling; Finite Element Modelling; Honeycomb structures; Impact

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038796626     PISSN: 13588265     EISSN: 17542111     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1533/ijcr.2003.0227     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. McFarland, R K Jr. “Hexagonal Cell Structures Under Post-Buckling Axial Load”, AIAA Journal, 1963, 1(6), 1380-1385.
2. Wierzbicki, Tomasz. “Crushing Analysis of Metal Honeycombs”, Int. J. Impact Engg, 1983 1(2), 155-174.
3. Wu, Enboa and Jiang, Wu-Shung. “Axial Crush Of Metal Honeycombs”, Int. J. Impact Engng, 1997, 19(5-6), 439-456.
4. Baker, W E, Togami, T C and Weydert, J C. (1998) “Static and Dynamic Properties of High-Density Metal Honeycombs”, Int. J. Impact Engg, 1998, 21(3), 149-163.
5. Corden, John, Honeycomb Structure - Engineering Materials Handbook, ASM International, 1990 721-728.
6. ESI Group, PAM-CRASH User Manual, ESI Group Software Product Co. Paris, 2000.
7. Santosa, S and Wierzbicki, T. “Crash Behavior of Box Columns Filled with Aluminium Honeycomb or Foam”, Computers and Structures, 1998, 68, 343-367.
8. Zhao, Han and Gary, G. “Crushing Behaviour of Aluminium Honeycombs Under Impact Loading”, Int. J. Impact Engg, 21(10), 827-836.
9. Jones, Norman. (1989) Structural Impact, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.
10. Meraghni, F, Desrumaux, F and Benzeggagh, M L. “Mech Behaviour of Cellular Core For Structural Sandwich Panels”- Composites: Part A 30, 767-779.
11. Langseth, M and Hopperstad, O S. Static and Dynamic Axial Crushing of Square Thin-Walled Aluminum Extusions, Int. J. Impact Engg, 1996, 18(7-8), 949-968.