An inductively-coupled, detachable receiver coil system for use with magnetic resonance compatible endoscopes

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 131-135

  Gilderdale, David J ^a   Williams, Andreanna D ^a   Dave, Umakant ^a   DeSouza, Nandita M ^a  

^a HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coils; Endoscopy; Esophagus; Inductive coupling; MRI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DETACHABLE RECEIVER COIL; DEVICE; ELECTRONICS; ENDOSCOPE; ENDOSCOPY; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; MALE; MEDIASTINUM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; ENDOSCOPES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PILOT PROJECTS;

EID: 0038787479     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10321     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Allum WH. Staging of oesophagogastric cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:1-2.
2. Pfau PR, Ginsberg GG, Lew RJ, Brensinger CM, Kochman ML. EUS predictors of long-term survival in esophageal carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:463-469.
3. Tio TL, Cohen P, Coene PP, et al. Endosonography and computed tomography of esophageal carcinoma. Preoperative classification compared to the new (1987) TNM system. Gastroenterology 1989;96:1478-1486.
4. Pham T, Roach E, Falk GL, Chu J, Ngu MC, Jones DB. Staging of oesophageal carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasound: preliminary experience. Aust N Z J Surg 1998;68:209-212.
5. Vickers J. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative assessment of patients with oesophageal cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998;80:233-239.
6. Angelelli G, Ianora AA, Scardapane A, Pedote P, Memeo M, Rotondo A. Role of computerized tomography in the staging of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Semin Surg Oncol 2001;20:109-121.
7. Takashima S, Takeuchi N, Shiozaki H, et al. Carcinoma of the esophagus: CT vs MR imaging in determining resectability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:297-302.
8. deSouza NM, Gilderdale DJ, Puni R, Coutts GA, Young IR. A solid re-usable endorectal receiver coil for magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: design, use and comparison with an inflatable endorectal coil. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:801-804.
9. deSouza NM, Scoones DJ, Krausz T, Gilderdale DJ, Soutter WP. High-resolution MR imaging of stage 1 cervical neoplasia, using a dedicated endovaginal coil: MR features and correlation of imaging and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:553-559.
10. deSouza NM, Hall AS, Puni R, Gilderdale DJ, Young IR, Kmiot WA. High-resolution magnetic resonance of the anal sphincter using a dedicated endoanal coil: comparison of MR imaging with surgical findings. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:926-934.
11. deSouza NM, Gibbons A, Coutts G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging during upper GI endoscopy: technical consideration and clinical feasibility. Minimally Invasive Therapy 1995;4:277-281.
12. Inui K, Nakazawa S, Yoshino J, et al. Endoscopic MRI: preliminary results of a new technique for visualization and staging of gastrointestinal tumors. Endoscopy 1995;27:480-485.
13. Kulling D, Feldman DR, Kay CL, et al. Local staging of esophageal cancer using endoscopic magnetic resonance imaging: prospective comparison with endoscopic ultrasound. Endoscopy 1998;30:745-749.