Roles of resonances and recollisions in strong-field atomic phenomena: Above-threshold ionization

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 534051-5340512

  Wassaf, Joseph ^a   Véniard, Valérie ^a   Taïeb, Richard ^a   Maquet, Alfred ^a  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTINUUM MECHANICS; ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; GROUND STATE; KINETIC ENERGY; LASER PULSES; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MULTIPHOTON PROCESSES; PHOTONS; QUANTUM THEORY; VECTORS; WAVE EQUATIONS;

ABOVE-THRESHOLD IONIZATION (ATI); LASER-INDUCED STATES;

PHOTOIONIZATION;

EID: 0038783369     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.053405     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. G.G. Paulus, W. Nicklich, H. Xu, P. Lambropoulos, and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2851 (1994).
2. M.P. Hertlein, P.H. Bucksbaum, and H.G. Muller, J. Phys. B 30, L197 (1997).
3. P. Hansch, M.A. Walker, and L.D. van Woerkom, Phys. Rev. A 55, R2535 (1997).
4. 2.
5. E. Cormier, D. Garzella, P. Breger, P. Agostini, G. Chériaux, and C. Leblanc, J. Phys. B 34, L9 (2001).
6. G.G. Paulus, W. Becker, W. Nicklich, and H. Walther, J. Phys. B 27, L703 (1994).
7. M.J. Nandor, M.A. Walker, L.D. van Woerkom, and H.G. Muller, Phys. Rev. A 60, R1771 (1999).
8. H.G. Muller and F.C. Kooiman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1207 (1998).
9. H.G. Muller, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1341 (1999); Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3158 (1999); Opt. Eng. (Bellingham) 8, 44 (2001).
10. H.G. Muller, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1341 (1999); Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3158 (1999); Opt. Eng. (Bellingham) 8, 44 (2001).
11. H.G. Muller, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1341 (1999); Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3158 (1999); Opt. Eng. (Bellingham) 8, 44 (2001).
12. G.G. Paulus, F. Grasbon, H. Walther, R. Kopold, and W. Becker, Phys. Rev. A 64, 021401 (R) (2001).
13. R. Kopold, W. Becker, M. Kleber, and G.G. Paulus, J. Phys. B 35, 217 (2002).
14. A. Lohr, M. Kleber, R. Kopold, and W. Becker, Phys. Rev. A 55, R4003 (1997); D.B. Milošević and F. Ehlotzky, ibid. 58, 3124 (1998); S.P. Goreslavskiǐ and S.V. Popruzhenko, JETP 90, 778 (2000).
15. A. Lohr, M. Kleber, R. Kopold, and W. Becker, Phys. Rev. A 55, R4003 (1997); D.B. Milošević and F. Ehlotzky, ibid. 58, 3124 (1998); S.P. Goreslavskiǐ and S.V. Popruzhenko, JETP 90, 778 (2000).
16. A. Lohr, M. Kleber, R. Kopold, and W. Becker, Phys. Rev. A 55, R4003 (1997); D.B. Milošević and F. Ehlotzky, ibid. 58, 3124 (1998); S.P. Goreslavskiǐ and S.V. Popruzhenko, JETP 90, 778 (2000).
17. B. Borca, M.V. Frolov, N.L. Manakov, and A. F Starace, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 193001 (2002).
18. S.V. Popruzhenko, P.A. Korneev, S.P. Goreslavski, and W. Becker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 023001 (2002).
19. C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, R. Kopold, W. Becker, and J.M. Rost, Phys. Rev. A 65, 023404 (2002).
20. R. Taïeb, V. Véniard, J. Wassaf, and A. Maquet (unpublished).
21. J. Wassaf, V. Véniard, R. Taïeb, and A. Maquet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 013003 (2003).
22. R. Bhatt, B. Piraux, and K. Burnett, Phys. Rev. A 37, 98 (1988).
23. J.C. Wells, I. Simbotin, and M. Gavrila, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3479 (1998); see also the discussion: P. Schlagheck, K. Hornberger, and A. Buchleitner, ibid. 82, 664 (1999); J.C. Wells, I. Simbotin, and M. Gavrila, ibid. 82, 665 (1999).
24. J.C. Wells, I. Simbotin, and M. Gavrila, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3479 (1998); see also the discussion: P. Schlagheck, K. Hornberger, and A. Buchleitner, ibid. 82, 664 (1999); J.C. Wells, I. Simbotin, and M. Gavrila, ibid. 82, 665 (1999).
25. J.C. Wells, I. Simbotin, and M. Gavrila, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3479 (1998); see also the discussion: P. Schlagheck, K. Hornberger, and A. Buchleitner, ibid. 82, 664 (1999); J.C. Wells, I. Simbotin, and M. Gavrila, ibid. 82, 665 (1999).
26. Q. Su and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A 44, 5997 (1991).
27. K.J. Schafer and K.C. Kulander, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5794 (1990).
28. W.G. Greenwood and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A 43, 525 (1991).
29. J. Wassaf, thesis Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 2002 (unpublished).
30. p. This more precise dependence is derived from the Floquet analysis presented below.
31. R. Freeman, P.H. Bucksbaum, H. Milchberg, S. Darack, D. Schumacher, and M.E. Geusic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1092 (1987).
32. One reports usually the populations computed at times when the field is zero during the cycle.
33. J.H. Shirley, Phys. Rev. 59, B979 (1965).
34. A. Maquet, S. Chu, and W.P. Reinhardt, Phys. Rev. A 27, 2946 (1983).
35. T. Millack, V. Véniard, and J. Henkel, Phys. Lett. A 176, 433 (1993).
36. M. Dörr, R.M. Potvliege, and R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A 41, 558 (1990).
37. M. Rotenberg, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 6, 233 (1970).
38. A. Maquet, Phys. Rev. A 15, 1088 (1977).
39. R.M. Potvliege, Comput. Phys. Commun. 114, 42 (1998).
40. W.C. Liu and C. W Clark, J. Phys. B 25, L517 (1992); C.W. Clark, ibid. 30, 2517 (1997).
41. W.C. Liu and C. W Clark, J. Phys. B 25, L517 (1992); C.W. Clark, ibid. 30, 2517 (1997).
42. G.G. Paulus, W. Becker, and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. A 52, 4043 (2001).
43. S. Flügge, Practical Quantum Mechanics (Springer, Berlin, 1971).
44. J.N. Bardsley, A. Szöke, and M.J. Comella, J. Phys. B 21, 3899 (1988).