Workflow optimization: Current trends and future directions

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 141-152

  Reiner, Bruce ^a   Siegel, Eliot ^a   Carrino, John A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; MEDICAL IMAGING; OPTIMIZATION; PERSONNEL;

RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; TASK CONSOLIDATION; WORKFLOW OPTIMIZATION;

PRODUCTIVITY;

AUTOMATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FUTUROLOGY; HEALTH SURVEY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; RADIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIST; REVIEW; STOCHASTIC MODEL; TASK PERFORMANCE; ARTICLE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RADIOLOGY; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT; WORKLOAD;

EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY, RADIOLOGIC; WORKLOAD;

EID: 0038777273     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-002-0022-7     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Barnes RM: Motion and Time Study: Design and Measurement of Work. Wiley, New York, NY, 1966
2. www.rdewan.ssb.rochester.edu
3. Reiner B, Siegel E, Carrino JA, et al: SCAR radiologic technologist survey: Analysis of technologist workforce and staffing. J Digit Imaging 15: 2002, http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10278/contents/02/0020/ index.html
4. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Carrino JA, et al: SCAR radiologic technologist survey: Analysis of the impact of digital technologies on productivity. J Digit Imaging 15: 2002, http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10278/contents/ 02/0021/index.html
5. Warburton RN: Evaluation of PACS-induced organizational change. Int J Biomed Comput 30:243-248, 1992
6. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, et al: Radiologist productivity in the interpretation of CT examinations: A comparison of PACS with conventional film. AJR 176:861-864, 2001
7. Reiner B, Siegel E, Protopapas Z, et al: Impact of filmless radiology on the frequency of clinician consultations with radiologists. AJR 173:1169-1172, 1999
8. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper F, et al: Impact of filmless imaging on the frequency of clinician review of radiology images. J Digit Imaging 11:149-150, 1998
9. Siegel EL, Reiner BI: Image Workflow. In: Dreyer K ed. Springer Verlag, New York, NY, 2002, pp 161-190
10. Siegel E, Reiner B: Work flow redesign: The key to success when using PACS. AJR 178:563-566, 2002
11. Reiner BI, Siegel EL: Technologists' productivity when using PACS: Comparison of film-based versus filmless radiography. AJR 179:33-37, 2002
12. Carrino JA, Khorasani R, Hanlon WB, et al: Modality interfacing: The impact of a relay station. J Digit Imaging 13:88-92, 2000
13. Siegel E, Reiner B: The ubiquitous zone: Your next stop in medical computing. Diagnostic Imaging 2001