Gamete donation and parental responsibility

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 77-87

  Bayne, Tim ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; ARTICLE; CHILD PARENT RELATION; DIRECTED TISSUE DONATION; DONOR; ETHICS; FEMALE; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; GERM CELL; HUMAN; MALE; MORALITY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARENT; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH; REPRODUCTION;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;

DIRECTED TISSUE DONATION; FEMALE; GERM CELLS; HUMANS; MALE; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; OWNERSHIP; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS; PARENTS; REPRODUCTION; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 0038761173     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5930.00236     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. D. BENATAR (1999) The unbearable lightness of bringing into being, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 16, 2, 173–80
2. J. L. NELSON (1991) Parental obligations and the ethics of surrogacy: a causal perspective, Public Affairs Quarterly, 5, 49–61.
3. A. KOLERS and T. BAYNE (2001) “Are you my mommy?” On the genetic basis of parenthood, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 18, 278–85
4. R. TONG (1990) The overdue death of a feminist chameleon: taking a stand on surrogacy arrangements, Journal of Social Philosophy, 21, 40–56
5. M. MOODY-ADAMS (1991) On surrogacy: morality, markets and motherhood, Public Affairs Quarterly, 5, 175–191
6. B. K. ROTHMAN (1989) Recreating Motherhood: Ideology and technology in a patriarchal society (New York, W.W. Norton)
7. G. ANNAS (1984) Redefining parenthood and protecting embryos: why we need new laws, The Hastings Center Report, 51, 51–52.
8. J. L. HILL (1991) What does it mean to be a ‘parent’? The claims of biology as the basis for parental rights, New York University Law Review, 66, 353–420
9. P. PARKER (1982) Surrogate motherhood: the interaction of litigation, legislation and psychiatry, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 341–54
10. A. STUMPF (1986) Redefining Mother: a legal matrix for new reproductive technologies, The Yale Law Journal, 96, 187–208
11. M. M. SHULTZ (1990) Reproductive technology and intent-based parenthood: an opportunity for gender neutrality, Wisconsin Law Review 1990; 297, 297–398
12. H. KRIMMEL (1998) The case against surrogate parenting. In G. Pence (ed.) Classic Works in Medical Ethics (Boston, McGraw-Hill) 127–137
13. B. HALL (1999) The origin of parental rights, Public Affairs Quarterly, 13, 73–82.
14. J. L. NELSON (1991) Parental obligations and the ethics of surrogacy: a causal perspective, Public Affairs Quarterly, 5, 49–613
15. J. BLUSTEIN (1997) Procreation and parental responsibility, Journal of Social Philosophy, 28, 79–86.
16. L. M. SILVER and S. R. SILVER (1998) Confused heritage and the absurdity of genetic ownership, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 11, 593–618.
17. B. STEINBOCK (2000) Sperm as property, in J. Harris and S. Hølm (eds) The Future of Human Reproduction (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
18. D. CALLAHAN (1992) Bioethics and fatherhood, Utah Law Review, 3, 735–746
19. S. KRIPKE (1971) Naming and Necessity (Cambridge, MA, Harvard), pp. 112–113, and D. PARFIT (1984) Reasons and Persons (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
20. R. MUNSON (1988) Artificial insemination and donor responsibility, in R. Munson (ed.) Intervention and Reflection (3rd ed.) (Belmont, CA, Wadsworth), p. 448.
21. C. ROVANE (1998) The Bounds of Agency (Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press).
22. D. BENATAR (1997) Why it is better never to come into existence, American Philosophical Quarterly, 34/3, 345–55
23. D. HEYD (1992) Genethics: Moral issues in the creation of people (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press).
24. S. SMILANSKY (1995) Is there a moral obligation to have children?, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 12, 41–53
25. H. LAFOLLETTE (1980) ‘Licensing parents,’ Philosophy & Public Affairs, 9, 183–97
26. D. ARCHARD (1993) Children: Rights and Childhood (London, Routledge).