Individual Differences and Compliance Gaining Message Selection: The Effects of Verbal Aggressivencess, Argumentativeness, Dogmatism, and Negativism

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1988, Pages 114-119

  Boster, Franklin J ^a   Levine, Timothy ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038760432     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824098809359811     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Canary, D.J., Cody, M.L., & Marston, P.J. (1987). Goal types and locus of control. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
2. Christie, R., & Geiss, F.L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. NY: Academic Press.
3. Cody, M.J., Green, J.O., Marston, P.J., O'Hair, H.D., Baase, K.T., & Schneider, M.J. (1985). Situational perception and message strategy selection. In M.L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 9, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Dillard, J.P., & Burgoon, M. (1985). Situational influences on the selection of compliance-gaining messages: Two tests of the predictive utility of the Cody-McLaughlin typology. Communication Monographs, 52(4), 289-318.
5. Hunter, J.P., & Boster, F.J. (1987). A model of compliance- gaining message selection. Communication Monographs, 54(1), 63-84.
6. Hunter, J.P., & Gerbing, D.W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis and causal models. In B.M. Straw and L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 4), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7. Hunter, J.P., Gerbing, D.W., & Boster, F.J. (1982). Machiavellian beliefs and personalty: Construct invalidity of the machiavellianism scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1293-1305.
8. Infante, B.A., & Rancer, A.S. (1982). A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 192-203.
9. Infante, D.A., Trebing, J.D., Sheperd, P.E., & Seeds, ?. (1984a). The relationship of argumentativeness to verbal aggression. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 50 (3), 67-77.
10. Infante, D.A., Wall, C.H., & Leap, C.J. (1984b). Verbal aggressiveness as a function of receivers argumentativeness. Communication Research Reports, 1(1), 33-37.
11. Infante, D.A., & Wigley, C.H. (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 53 (1), 61-69.
12. Kaminski, E., McDermott, S.T., & Boster, F.J. (1977). The use of compliance-gaining strategies as a function of machiavellianism and situation. A paper presented at the Central States Speech Communication Association, Southfield, MI.
13. Marston, P.L., Baaske, K.T., & Cody, M.J. (1986). Locus of control and the social influence process. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
14. Miller, G.R., Boster, F.J., Roloff, M.E., & Seibold, D.R. (1977). Compliance-gaining message strategies: A typology and some findings concerning the effects of situational differences. Communication Monographs, 44, 37-51.
15. Miller, G.R., Boster, F.J., Roloff, M.E., & Seibold, D.R. (1987). MBRS rekindled: Some though on compliance gaining in interpersonal settings. In M.E. Roloff and G.R. Miller (Eds.), Further Explorations in Interpersonal Communication, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. Pedhazur, E.J. (1982). Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
17. Reynolds, R.A. (1987). Argumentativeness, need for cognition, and assertiveness as predictors of compliance gaining message strategy selections. A paper presented at the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
18. Rokeach, M. (1960). The Open and Closed Mind, NY: Basic Books.
19. Roloff, M.E., & Barnicott, E.F., Jr. (1979). The influence of dogmatism on the situational use of pro- and anti-social compliance-gaining strategies. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 45, 37-54.
20. Smith, S.W., & Cody, M.J. (1986). Communication apprehension and the selection of influence strategies. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
21. Troldahl, V.C., & Powell, F.A. (1956). A short form dogmatism scale for use in field studies. Social Forces, 44, 211-214.
22. Williams, D.L., & Boster, F.J. (1981). The effects of beneficial situational characteristics, negativism, and dogmatism on compliance-gaining message selection. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Minneapolis, MN.