Construction and complexation studies of some self-assembled diporphyrin receptors

Journal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 112-119

  Fanti, Chiara ^a   Monti, Donato ^a   La Monica, Laura ^a,c   Ceccacci, Francesca ^b   Mancini, Giovanna ^b   Paolesse, Roberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c Wyeth SpA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Amines; Hydrogen bonding; Porphyrins; Supramolecular chemistry; UV vis spectroscopy

Indexed keywords

ALIPHATIC AMINE; AMINO ACID; AROMATIC AMINE; CARBOXYL GROUP; PORPHYRIN DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC CARBOXYPHENYLPORPHYRIN DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPLEX FORMATION; GEOMETRY; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY;

EID: 0038753825     PISSN: 10884246     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S108842460300015X     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. a) Chambron J-C, Heitz V and Sauvage J-P. In The Porphyrin Handbook, Vol. 6, Kadish KM, Smith KM, Guilard R. (Eds.) Academic Press: London, 2000; pp 1-42.
2. b) Sanders JKM. In Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, Vol. 9, Atwood JL, Davies JE, Mac Nicol DD, Vogtle F. (Eds.) Elsevier: Oxford, 1996; pp 131-164.
3. a) Ward MD. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1997; 26: 365-376.
4. b) Kurreck H and Huber M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1995; 34: 849-866.
5. c) Wasielewski MR. Chem. Rev. (Washington, DC, U. S.) 1992; 92: 435-461.
6. a) Collman JP, Wagenknecht PS and Hutchinson JE. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1994; 33: 1537-1554.
7. b) Hayashi T and Ogoshi H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1997; 26: 355-364.
8. a) Ogoshi H, Mizutani T, Hayashi T and Kuroda Y. In The Porphyrin Handbook, Vol. 6, Kadish KM, Smith KM, Guilard R. (Eds.) Academic Press: San Diego, 2000; pp 279-340.
9. b) Verboom W and Reinhoudt DN. In Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, Vol. 2, Atwood JL, Davies JE, Mac Nicol DD, Vogtle F. (Eds.) Elsevier: Oxford, 1996; pp 495-517.
10. c) Weiss J. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2001; 40: 1-22.
11. a) La Monica L and Monti D. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2002; 6: 58-65.
12. b) Monti D, La Monica L, Scipioni A and Mancini G. New J. Chem. 2001; 25: 780-782.
13. For a report on the "state of the art" of molecular recognition see for example: "Special issue on supramolecular chemistry and molecular recognition", Chem. Rev. 1997; 97.
14. For porphyrin-based supramolecular receptors achieved by coordinative interaction see: a) Stulz E, Ng YF, Scott SM and Sanders JKM. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2002; 5: 524-525. b) Kim H-J, Bampos N and Sanders JKM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 8120-8121. c) Slone RV and Hupp JT. Inorg. Chem. 1997; 36: 5422-5423. d) Hunter CA and Sarson LD. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1994; 33: 2313-2316. e) MacKay LG, Anderson HL and Sanders JKM. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1995: 2269-2273. f) Drain CM and Lehn J-M. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 1994: 2313-2315.
15. For porphyrin-based supramolecular receptors achieved by coordinative interaction see: a) Stulz E, Ng YF, Scott SM and Sanders JKM. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2002; 5: 524-525. b) Kim H-J, Bampos N and Sanders JKM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 8120-8121. c) Slone RV and Hupp JT. Inorg. Chem. 1997; 36: 5422-5423. d) Hunter CA and Sarson LD. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1994; 33: 2313-2316. e) MacKay LG, Anderson HL and Sanders JKM. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1995: 2269-2273. f) Drain CM and Lehn J-M. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 1994: 2313-2315.
16. For porphyrin-based supramolecular receptors achieved by coordinative interaction see: a) Stulz E, Ng YF, Scott SM and Sanders JKM. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2002; 5: 524-525. b) Kim H-J, Bampos N and Sanders JKM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 8120-8121. c) Slone RV and Hupp JT. Inorg. Chem. 1997; 36: 5422-5423. d) Hunter CA and Sarson LD. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1994; 33: 2313-2316. e) MacKay LG, Anderson HL and Sanders JKM. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1995: 2269-2273. f) Drain CM and Lehn J-M. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 1994: 2313-2315.
17. For porphyrin-based supramolecular receptors achieved by coordinative interaction see: a) Stulz E, Ng YF, Scott SM and Sanders JKM. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2002; 5: 524-525. b) Kim H-J, Bampos N and Sanders JKM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 8120-8121. c) Slone RV and Hupp JT. Inorg. Chem. 1997; 36: 5422-5423. d) Hunter CA and Sarson LD. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1994; 33: 2313-2316. e) MacKay LG, Anderson HL and Sanders JKM. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1995: 2269-2273. f) Drain CM and Lehn J-M. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 1994: 2313-2315.
18. For porphyrin-based supramolecular receptors achieved by coordinative interaction see: a) Stulz E, Ng YF, Scott SM and Sanders JKM. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2002; 5: 524-525. b) Kim H-J, Bampos N and Sanders JKM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 8120-8121. c) Slone RV and Hupp JT. Inorg. Chem. 1997; 36: 5422-5423. d) Hunter CA and Sarson LD. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1994; 33: 2313-2316. e) MacKay LG, Anderson HL and Sanders JKM. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1995: 2269-2273. f) Drain CM and Lehn J-M. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 1994: 2313-2315.
19. For porphyrin-based supramolecular receptors achieved by coordinative interaction see: a) Stulz E, Ng YF, Scott SM and Sanders JKM. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2002; 5: 524-525. b) Kim H-J, Bampos N and Sanders JKM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 8120-8121. c) Slone RV and Hupp JT. Inorg. Chem. 1997; 36: 5422-5423. d) Hunter CA and Sarson LD. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1994; 33: 2313-2316. e) MacKay LG, Anderson HL and Sanders JKM. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1995: 2269-2273. f) Drain CM and Lehn J-M. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 1994: 2313-2315.
20. For porphyrin-based supramolecular receptors based on hydrogen bonding motifs see: a) Drain CM, Fischer R, Nolen EG and Lehn JM. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993: 243-245. b) Kuroda Y, Kawashima A, Hayashi Y and Ogoshi H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 4929-4933. c) Guest-templated selection of noncovalent combinatorial assembling of porphyrin-based receptors have recently been reported: Calama MC, Timmerman P and Reinhoudt DN. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000; 39: 755-758, and references therein. For recent examples of self-assembling of porphyrin derivatives with potential features as receptor see: d) Ikeda C, Nagahara N, Motegi E, Yoshioka N and Inoue H. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 1999: 1759-1760. e) Felluga F, Tecilla P, Hillier L, Hunter CA, Licini G and Scrimin P. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2000: 1087-1088.
21. For porphyrin-based supramolecular receptors based on hydrogen bonding motifs see: a) Drain CM, Fischer R, Nolen EG and Lehn JM. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993: 243-245. b) Kuroda Y, Kawashima A, Hayashi Y and Ogoshi H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 4929-4933. c) Guest-templated selection of noncovalent combinatorial assembling of porphyrin-based receptors have recently been reported: Calama MC, Timmerman P and Reinhoudt DN. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000; 39: 755-758, and references therein. For recent examples of self-assembling of porphyrin derivatives with potential features as receptor see: d) Ikeda C, Nagahara N, Motegi E, Yoshioka N and Inoue H. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 1999: 1759-1760. e) Felluga F, Tecilla P, Hillier L, Hunter CA, Licini G and Scrimin P. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2000: 1087-1088.
22. For porphyrin-based supramolecular receptors based on hydrogen bonding motifs see: a) Drain CM, Fischer R, Nolen EG and Lehn JM. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993: 243-245. b) Kuroda Y, Kawashima A, Hayashi Y and Ogoshi H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 4929-4933. c) Guest-templated selection of noncovalent combinatorial assembling of porphyrin-based receptors have recently been reported: Calama MC, Timmerman P and Reinhoudt DN. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000; 39: 755-758, and references therein. For recent examples of self-assembling of porphyrin derivatives with potential features as receptor see: d) Ikeda C, Nagahara N, Motegi E, Yoshioka N and Inoue H. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 1999: 1759-1760. e) Felluga F, Tecilla P, Hillier L, Hunter CA, Licini G and Scrimin P. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2000: 1087-1088.
23. For porphyrin-based supramolecular receptors based on hydrogen bonding motifs see: a) Drain CM, Fischer R, Nolen EG and Lehn JM. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993: 243-245. b) Kuroda Y, Kawashima A, Hayashi Y and Ogoshi H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 4929-4933. c) Guest-templated selection of noncovalent combinatorial assembling of porphyrin-based receptors have recently been reported: Calama MC, Timmerman P and Reinhoudt DN. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000; 39: 755-758, and references therein. For recent examples of self-assembling of porphyrin derivatives with potential features as receptor see: d) Ikeda C, Nagahara N, Motegi E, Yoshioka N and Inoue H. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 1999: 1759-1760. e) Felluga F, Tecilla P, Hillier L, Hunter CA, Licini G and Scrimin P. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2000: 1087-1088.
24. For porphyrin-based supramolecular receptors based on hydrogen bonding motifs see: a) Drain CM, Fischer R, Nolen EG and Lehn JM. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993: 243-245. b) Kuroda Y, Kawashima A, Hayashi Y and Ogoshi H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 4929-4933. c) Guest-templated selection of noncovalent combinatorial assembling of porphyrin-based receptors have recently been reported: Calama MC, Timmerman P and Reinhoudt DN. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000; 39: 755-758, and references therein. For recent examples of self-assembling of porphyrin derivatives with potential features as receptor see: d) Ikeda C, Nagahara N, Motegi E, Yoshioka N and Inoue H. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 1999: 1759-1760. e) Felluga F, Tecilla P, Hillier L, Hunter CA, Licini G and Scrimin P. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2000: 1087-1088.
25. a) Kral V, Springs SL and Sessler JL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995; 117: 8881-8882.
26. b) Turro C, Chang CK, Leroi GE, Cukier RI and Nocera DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992; 114: 4013-4015.
27. c) Deng Y, Roberts JA, Peng S-M, Chang CK and Nocera DG. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997; 36: 2124-2127.
28. d) Kral V, Schmidtchen FP, Lang K and Berger M. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 51-54.
29. e) Porphyrin-based donor-acceptor systems assembled by electrostatic interactions have been recently reviewed: Sessler JL, Wang B, Springs SL and Brown CT. In Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, Vol. 9, Atwood JL, Davies JE, Mac Nicol DD, Vogtle F. (Eds.) Elsevier: Oxford, 1996; pp 311-336.
30. Monti D, Venanzi M, Mancini G, Marotti F, La Monica L and Boschi T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999: 1901-1906.
31. a) Huang X, Rickman BH, Borhan B, Berova N and Nakanishi K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 6185-6186.
32. b) Kibbey CE and Meyerhoff ME. Anal. Chem. 1993; 65: 2189-2196.
33. a) It is known that the carboxylic acid-N-base proton transfer equilibria are strongly favoured in chlorinated solvents such as dichloromethane or chloroform. See for example: Kraemer R and Zundel G. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1990; 86: 301-305, and references therein.
34. 2, (or 1Zn) and the investigated aliphatic diamines. See for example: Kortüm G, Vogel W and Andrussow K. In Dissociation constants of organic acids in aqueous solutions Butterworths: London, 1961.
35. c) Izutsu K. In Acid-Base Dissociation Constants in Dipolar Aprotic Solvents, Vol. IUPAC Chemical Data Series NR. 32 Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, 1990.
36. ei are relative to the acid-base and the subsequent electrostatic interaction equilibria, respectively.
37. a) Kobayashi K, Shirasaka T, Yamaguchi K, Sakamoto S, Horn E and Furukawa N. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2000: 41-42.
38. b) Kuroda Y, Kato Y and Ogoshi H. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 1997: 469-470.
39. For some excellent, recent overviews on the role of hydrogen bonding in supramolecular chemistry see: a) Prins LJ, Reinhoudt DN and Timmerman P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001; 40: 2383-2426. b) Sherrington DC and Taskinen KA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001; 30: 83-93.
40. For some excellent, recent overviews on the role of hydrogen bonding in supramolecular chemistry see: a) Prins LJ, Reinhoudt DN and Timmerman P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001; 40: 2383-2426. b) Sherrington DC and Taskinen KA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001; 30: 83-93.
41. 1H NMR upfield shift of ligand resonances constitutes an evidence of the inclusion in diporphyrin cavities: Hunter CA, Meah MN and Sanders JKM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990; 112: 5773-5780. For related studies on 1,4-bpy coordination see, for example, reference 8a.
42. Connors KA. Binding Constants. The measurements of molecular complex stability; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1987.
43. The coordination ability of amine ligands usually follows their basicity strength. See for example: Bhyrappa P, Krishnan V and Nethaji M. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1993: 1901-1906.
44. The UV-vis spectral changes, upon addition of this ligand to 2Zn, are similar to that observed for 4,4′-bpy. This indicates the occurrence of an interaction via coordination of both of nitrogen sites and, concomitantly, a 1:1 complex formation.
45. i indicates the value relative to the monotopic host 1Zn. See for example: Danks IP, Lane TG, Sutherland IO and Yap M. Tetrahedron 1992; 48: 7679-7688. In self-assembly processes the term effective molarity (EM), i.e. the tendency to cyclisation, is generally used.
46. b) Mandolini L. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1986; 22: 1-111.
47. c) Ercolani G, Ioele M and Monti D. New J. Chem. 2001; 25: 783-789.
48. a) Hunter CA and Sanders JKM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990; 112: 5525-5534. For recent reports on the quantification of π-π stacking interactions in hydrogen bonding self assembled aromatic suprastructures see: b) Adams H, Hunter CA, Lawson KR, Perkins J, Spey SE, Urch CJ and Sanderson JM. Chem.Eur. J. 2001; 7: 4863-4877. c) Carver FJ, Hunter CA, Livingstone DJ, McCabe JF and Seward EM. Chem.Eur. J. 2002; 8: 2847-2859, and references therein.
49. a) Hunter CA and Sanders JKM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990; 112: 5525-5534. For recent reports on the quantification of π-π stacking interactions in hydrogen bonding self assembled aromatic suprastructures see: b) Adams H, Hunter CA, Lawson KR, Perkins J, Spey SE, Urch CJ and Sanderson JM. Chem.Eur. J. 2001; 7: 4863-4877. c) Carver FJ, Hunter CA, Livingstone DJ, McCabe JF and Seward EM. Chem.Eur. J. 2002; 8: 2847-2859, and references therein.
50. a) Hunter CA and Sanders JKM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990; 112: 5525-5534. For recent reports on the quantification of π-π stacking interactions in hydrogen bonding self assembled aromatic suprastructures see: b) Adams H, Hunter CA, Lawson KR, Perkins J, Spey SE, Urch CJ and Sanderson JM. Chem.Eur. J. 2001; 7: 4863-4877. c) Carver FJ, Hunter CA, Livingstone DJ, McCabe JF and Seward EM. Chem.Eur. J. 2002; 8: 2847-2859, and references therein.
51. If a polymerisation was occurring in a linear fashion via a series of simple 1:1 binding events the apparent association constant would show only a moderate increase of K. For some recent examples related to porphyrin chemistry see: a) Twyman LJ and King ASH. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2002: 910-911. b) Drain CM, Shi XX, Milic T and Nifiatis F. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2001; 3: 287-288. c) For a quantitative approach to the problem see: Ercolani G. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2001: 1416-1417.
52. If a polymerisation was occurring in a linear fashion via a series of simple 1:1 binding events the apparent association constant would show only a moderate increase of K. For some recent examples related to porphyrin chemistry see: a) Twyman LJ and King ASH. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2002: 910-911. b) Drain CM, Shi XX, Milic T and Nifiatis F. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2001; 3: 287-288. c) For a quantitative approach to the problem see: Ercolani G. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2001: 1416-1417.
53. If a polymerisation was occurring in a linear fashion via a series of simple 1:1 binding events the apparent association constant would show only a moderate increase of K. For some recent examples related to porphyrin chemistry see: a) Twyman LJ and King ASH. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2002: 910-911. b) Drain CM, Shi XX, Milic T and Nifiatis F. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2001; 3: 287-288. c) For a quantitative approach to the problem see: Ercolani G. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, U. K.) 2001: 1416-1417.
54. Steiner T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002; 41: 48-76.
55. The structure of oligomeric assemblies of porphyrin derivatives in solution can be tuned, from cyclic to linear arrays, by geometrical constraints of the assembling units: Gardner M, Guerin AJ, Hunter CA, Michelsen U and Rotger C. New J. Chem. 1999; 23: 309-316.
56. a) Lehn JM. Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and Perspectives; Wiley-VCH: Veinheim, 1995; p 272.
57. b) de Rege PJF, Williams SA and Therien MJ. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 1995; 269: 1409-1413.
58. Chou J-H, Kosal ME, Nalwa HS, Rakow NA and Suslick KS. In The Porphyrin Handbook, Vol. 6, Kadish KM, Smith KM, Guilard R. (Eds.) Academic Press: San Diego, 2000; pp 43-131.
59. de Silva AP, Gunaratne HQN, Gunnlaugsson T, Huxley AJM, McCoy CP, Rademacher JT and Rice TE. Chem. Rev. (Washington, DC, U. S.) 1997; 97: 1515-1566.
60. Perrin DD, Armarego WLF and Perrin DE. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals, 2nd ed.; Pergamon Press: New York, 1980.
61. a) Sanders JKM. Chem.Eur. J. 1998; 4: 1378-1383.
62. b) MacKay LG, Wylie RS and Sanders JKM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994; 116: 3141-3142.
63. Important studies on the enantioselective binding of aminoacid derivatives by a rigid diporphyrin cleft have been reported. See for example: a) Crossley MJ, Mackay LG and Try AC. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995: 1925-1927. b) Crossley MJ, Hambley TW, Mackay LG, Try AC and Walton R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995: 1077-1079. For recent reports on asymmetric induction in multiporphyrin hydrogen-bonded assemblies see: c) Prins LJ, Huskens J, De Jong F, Timmerman P and Reinhoudt DN. Nature (London) 1999; 398: 498-502.
64. Important studies on the enantioselective binding of aminoacid derivatives by a rigid diporphyrin cleft have been reported. See for example: a) Crossley MJ, Mackay LG and Try AC. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995: 1925-1927. b) Crossley MJ, Hambley TW, Mackay LG, Try AC and Walton R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995: 1077-1079. For recent reports on asymmetric induction in multiporphyrin hydrogen-bonded assemblies see: c) Prins LJ, Huskens J, De Jong F, Timmerman P and Reinhoudt DN. Nature (London) 1999; 398: 498-502.
65. Important studies on the enantioselective binding of aminoacid derivatives by a rigid diporphyrin cleft have been reported. See for example: a) Crossley MJ, Mackay LG and Try AC. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995: 1925-1927. b) Crossley MJ, Hambley TW, Mackay LG, Try AC and Walton R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995: 1077-1079. For recent reports on asymmetric induction in multiporphyrin hydrogen-bonded assemblies see: c) Prins LJ, Huskens J, De Jong F, Timmerman P and Reinhoudt DN. Nature (London) 1999; 398: 498-502.
66. Paolesse R, Monti D, La Monica L, Venanzi M, Froiio A, Nardis S, Di Natale C, Martinelli E and A DA. Chem.Eur. J. 2002; 8: 2476-2483.