Effect of femoral component design on unresurfaced patellas in knee arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 410, Issue , 2003, Pages 189-198

  Whiteside, Leo A ^a   Nakamura, Takashi ^b  

^a Missouri Bone and Joint Center   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BODY WEIGHT; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPOTHESIS; JOINT MOBILITY; JOINT PRESSURE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PAIN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PATELLA; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; PRESSURE TRANSDUCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; QUADRICEPS FEMORIS MUSCLE; REOPERATION; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 0038743267     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000063605.67412.4d     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Andriacchi TP, Yoder D, Conley A, et al: Patellofemoral design influences function following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:243-249, 1997.
2. Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, et al: Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 83A:1376-1381, 2001.
3. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Kramer J, Hardie R, Robertson D: Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella during total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 321:156-161, 1995.
4. Boyd AD, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB: Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg 75A:674-681, 1993.
5. Enis JE, Gardner R, Robledo MA, Latta L, Smith R: Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 260:38-42, 1990.
6. Ewald FC, Wright RJ, Poss R, et al: Kinematic total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:473-480, 1999.
7. Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM: Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 78B:226-228, 1996.
8. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13-14, 1989.
9. Kirk PG, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB: Clinical comparison of the Miller Galante I and AMK total knee systems. J Arthroplasty 9:131-136, 1994.
10. Levai JP, McLeod HC, Freeman MAR: Why not resurface the patella? J Bone Joint Surg 65B:448-451, 1983.
11. Matsuda S, Whiteside LA: Contact stresses with an unresurfaced patella in total knee arthroplasty: The effect of femoral component design. Orthopedics 23:213-218, 2000.
12. Petersilge WJ, Oishi CS, Kaufman KR, Irby SE, Colwell Jr CW: The effect of trochlear design on patellofemoral shear and compressive forces in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 309:124-130, 1994.
13. Picetti III GD, McGann WA, Welch, RB: The patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg 72A:1379-1382, 1990.
14. Soudry M, Mestriner LA, Binazzi R, Insall JN: Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Clin Orthop 205:166-170, 1986.
15. Thompson NW, Ruiz AL, Breslin E, Beverland DE: Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing in isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 16:607-612, 2001.
16. Wood DJ, Smith AJ, White B, et al: Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg 84A:187-193, 2002.