Epistemology's search for significance

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 203-216

  Bishop, Michael A ^a   Trout, J D ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EPISTEMOLOGY;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 0038735723     PISSN: 0952813X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0952813021000055153     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Alston, W., 1989, Epistemic Justification (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
2. Bishop, M., and Trout, J. D., 2002, 50 years of successful predictive modeling should be enough: lessons for philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science: PSA 2000 Symposium Papers.
3. BonJour, L., 1985, The Structure of Empirical Knowledge (Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press).
4. Feldman, R., 1985, Reliability and justification. The Monist, 68: 159-174.
5. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S., 1977, Knowing with certainty: the appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3: 552-564.
6. Gilovich, T., 1991, How We Know What Isn't So (New York: The Free Press).
7. Godfrey-Smith, P. 1991, Signal, decision, action. The Journal of Philosophy, 91: 709-722.
8. Goldman, A., 1979, What is justified belief? In G. Pappas (ed.) Justification and Knowledge (Dordrecht: Reidel), pp. 1-23.
9. Goldman, A., 1999, Internalism exposed. The Journal of Philosophy, 96: 271-293.
10. Kitcher, P., 2001, Science, Truth, and Democracy (New York: Oxford University Press).
11. Kuhn, T., 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
12. Pollock, J., and Cruz, J., 1999, Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, 2nd edn (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield).
13. Swets, J., 1992, The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high stakes diagnostics. American Psychologist, 47, 522-532.
14. Swets, J., Dawes, R., and Monahan, J., 2000, Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1: 1-26.