Predicting species diversity with ED: The quest for evidence

Ecography

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 380-383

  Araujo M B ^a,b   Densham, P ^c   Humphries, C ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PREDICTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

EID: 0038725561     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03625.x     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Araújo, M. B. and Williams, P. H. 2001. The bias of complementarity hotspots toward marginal populations. - Conserv. Biol. 15: 1710-1720.
2. Araújo, M. B. et al. 2001. Would environmental diversity be a good surrogate for species diversity? - Ecography 24: 103-110.
3. Cabrero-sañudo, F. J. and Lobo, J. M. 2003. Estimating the number of species not yet described and their characteristics: the case of Western Palearctic dung beetle species (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea). - Biodiv. Conserv. 12: 147-166.
4. Church, R. L. and Sorensen, P. 1996. Integrating normative location models into GIS: problems and prospects with the p-median model. - In: Longley, P. A. and Batty, M. (eds), Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment. GeoInformation International, Cambridge, pp. 167-183.
5. Densham, P. J. and Rushton, G. 1992. A more efficient heuristic for solving large p-median problems. - Pap. Reg. Sci. 71: 307-329.
6. Faith, D. F. 2003. Environmental diversity (ED) as surrogate information for species-level biodiversity. - Ecography 26: 374-379.
7. Faith, D. P. and Walker, P. A. 1996. Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas. - Biodiv. Conserv. 5: 399-415.
8. Ferrier, S. 2002. Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? - Syst. Biol. 42: 331-356.
9. Ferrier, S. and Watson, G. 1997. An evaluation of the effectiveness of environmental surrogates and modelling techniques in predicting the distribution of biological diversity. - Environment Australia.
10. Hirzel, A. and Guisan, A. 2002. Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modelling? - Ecol. Modell. 157: 331-341.
11. Manly, B. F. J. 1998. Randomization, bootstrapping and monte carlo methods in biology, 2nd ed. - Chapman and Hall.
12. Teitz, M. B. and Bart, P. 1968. Heuristic methods for estimating generalized VertexMedian of a weighted graph. - Operations Res. 16: 955-961.