Public policy and the changing landscape

Estuaries

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 210-225

  Bockstael, Nancy E ^a   Irwin, Elena G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAND USE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 0038721767     PISSN: 01608347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02695963     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ALLEN, P. AND M. SANGLIER. 1981. A dynamic model of a central place system - II. Geographical Analysis 13:149-64.
2. ALLISON, P. D. 1995. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
3. ALONSO, W. 1964. Location and Land Use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
4. ANAS, A. AND I. KIM. 1996. General equilibrium models of polycentric urban land use with endogenous congestion and job agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics 40:232-256.
5. ARTHUR, W. B. 1988. Urban systems and historical path dependence, p. 85-97. In J. Ausubel and R. Herman (eds.), Cities and Their Vital Systems. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
6. BAKER, W. 1989. A review of models of landscape change. Landscape Ecology 2:111-133.
7. BELL, K. AND N. BOCKSTAEL. 2000. Applying the generalized moments estimation approach to spatial problems involving micro-level data. Review of Economics and Statistics February, 2000.
8. BERECHMAN, J. AND K. SMALL. 1988. Research policy and review 25. Modeling land use and transportation: An interpretive review for growth areas. Environment and Planning 20:1285-1309.
9. BOCKSTAEL, N. E. 1996. Modeling economics and ecology: The importance of a spatial perspective. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78:1168-80.
10. BOCKSTAEL, N. AND K. BELL. 1997. Land use patterns and water quality: The effect of differential land management controls, p. 169-192. In R. Just and S. Netanyahu (eds.), International Water and Resource Economics Consortium, Conflict and Cooperation on Trans-Boundary Water Resources. Kluwer Publishing, Boston, Massachusetts.
11. COX, R. D. 1972. Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B34:187-220.
12. DENDRINOS, D. AND J. B. ROSSER. 1992. Fundamental issues in nonlinear urban population dynamic models: Theory and a synthesis. Annals of Regional Science 26:135-45.
13. IRWIN, E. 1998. Do spatial externalities matter? The role of endogenous interactions in the evolution of land use pattern. Ph.D. Dissertation, Agricultural and Resource Economics Department, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
14. IRWIN, E. AND N. BOCKSTAEL. 2001. The problem of identifying land use spillovers: Measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3):698-704.
15. IRWIN, E. AND N. BOCKSTAEL. 2002. Urban sprawl as a spatial economic process. Manuscript prepared for the Lincoln Land Institute International Seminar on Analysis of Urban Land Markets and the Impact of Land Market Regulation. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
16. KELEJLAN, H. AND I. PRUCHA. 1999. A generalized moments estimator for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial model. International Economic Review 40:509-533.
17. KRUGMAN, P. 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99:438-99.
18. KRUGMAN, P. 1996. The Self-Organizing Economy. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
19. LAGRO, J. AND S. DEGLORIA. 1992. Land use dynamics within an urbanizing non-metropolitan county in New York State (USA). Landscape Ecology 7:275-289.
20. LANCASTER, T. 1997. The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
21. LANDIS, J. 1995. Imagining land use futures. Applying the California urban futures model. Journal of the American Planning Association 61:438-457.
22. LIU D. S., L. R. IVERSON, AND S. BROWN. 1993. Rates and patterns of deforestation in the Philippines: Application of geographic information system analysis. Forest Ecology and Management 57:1-16.
23. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING. 1998. MdProperty View (a digital product). Annapolis, Maryland.
24. MERTENS, B. AND E. LAMBIN. 1997. Spatial modeling of deforestation in southern Cameroon. Applied Geography 17:143-162.
25. MICELI, T. AND K. SEGERSON. 1996. Compensation for Regulatory Takings: An Economic Analysis with Applications. Jai Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.
26. MILLS E. S. 1967. An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. American Economic Review 57:197-210.
27. MUTH R. 1969. Cities and Housing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
28. NICKERSON, C. 2000. Characterizing participation in Farmland Preservation Programs. Ph.D. Dissertation, Agricultural and Resource Economics Department, University, of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
29. NIJKAMP, P. AND A. REGGIANI. 1998. The Economics of Complex Spatial Systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
30. PAGE, S. 1999. On the emergence of cities. Journal of Urban Economics 45:184-208.
31. PAPAGEORGIOU, Y. Y AND T. R. SMITH. 1983. Agglomeration as local instability in spatially uniform steady-states. Econometrica 51:1109-19.
32. PARSONS, G. R. 1992. The effect of coastal land use restrictions on housing prices: A repeat sales analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22:25-37.
33. WILSON, A. G. 1981. Catastrophe Theory and Bifurcation: Applications in Urban and Regional Geography. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
34. ZHANG, W.-B. 1993. Location choice and land use in an isolated state: Endogenous capital and knowledge accumulation. Annals of Regional Science 27:23-39.