Use and effectiveness of oral analgesia when fitting an intrauterine device

Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 150-151

  Murty, Judy ^a  

^a NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFICACY; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; NORMAL HUMAN; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

EID: 0038713730     PISSN: 14711893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1783/147118903101197539     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Goldstuck ND. The management of intrauterine device related pain. Br J Fam Plann 1979; 5: 63-65.
2. Seamark C. Is the fitting of an intrauterine contraceptive device a painful experience? Br J Fam Plann 1993; 19: 227-229.
3. Oloto EJ, Bromham DR, Murty JA. Pain and discomfort perception at IUD insertion - effect of short-duration, low volume, intracervical application of two percent lignocaine gel (Instillagel) - a preliminary study. Br J Fam Plann 1996; 22: 177-180.
4. Hollingworth B. Pain control during insertion of an intrauterine device. Br J Fam Plann 1995; 21: 102-103.
5. Analgesics for primary dysmenorrhoea. Bandolier. 17 June 2002. www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/painpag/Chronrev/Analges/CP066.html
6. Conference round up. London: new light on chronic pelvic pain in women. Trends Urol Gynaecol Sex Health 2002; 7(2): 11-14.