A prospective study of the contribution of uroflowmetry in urodynamic investigation

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 191-192

  Onyeka, B A ^a,b  

^a LANCASHIRE TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLADDER; CLINICAL TRIAL; CYSTOMETRY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESIDUAL URINE; UNITED KINGDOM; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE CATHETER; URINE FLOW RATE; URODYNAMICS; UROFLOWMETRY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RHEOLOGY; URODYNAMICS; UROLOGIC DISEASES;

EID: 0038705961     PISSN: 01443615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0144361031000074790     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Carlson K.V., Fiske J. and Nitti V.M. (2000) Value of the routine evaluation of the voiding phase when performing urodynamic testing in women with lower urinary tract symptoms. Journal of Urology, 164, 1614-1618.
2. Groutz A., Blaivas J.G., Fait G., Sassone A.M., Chailin D.C. and Gordon D. (2000) The significance of the American Urological Association symptom index score in the evaluation of women with bladder outlet obstruction. Journal of Urology, 163, 207-211.
3. Jorgensen J.B., Colstrup H. and Frimodt-Moller C. (1998) Uroflow in women: an overview and suggestions for the future. International Urogynecology Journal of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, 9, 33-36.
4. Lemack G.E. and Zimmern P.E. (2000) Pressure flow analysis may aid in identifying women with outflow obstruction. Journal of Urology, 163, 1823-1828.