A new method to compare planned and achieved position of an orthopaedic implant

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 117-127

  Popescu, Florin ^a   Viceconti, Marco ^a   Grazi, Erika ^a,b   Cappello, Angelo ^b  

^a RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computer aided surgery; Hip prosthesis; Planned versus achieved accuracy

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); SURGERY;

ITERATIVE CLOSEST POINT (ICP) METHOD;

ORTHOPEDICS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FEMUR; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PLANNING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; REGISTER; REGISTRATION; ROTATION; TECHNIQUE;

ORTHOPEDICS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 0038701794     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2607(02)00091-3     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bargar W.L. Shape the implant to the patient. A rationale for the use of custom-fit cementless total hip implants. Clin. Orthop. 249:1989;73-78.
2. Zannoni C., Gori R., Quadrani P., Viceconti M., Toni A. Preoperative planning tools for total hip arthroplasty. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering. 2000;395-400 Gordon & Breach, Amsterdam.
3. Sugano N., Ohzono K., Nishii T., Haraguchi K., Sakai T., Ochi T. Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Comput. Aided Surg. 3:1998;320-324.
4. DiGioia A.M., Jaramaz B., Blackwell M., Simon D.A., Morgan F., Moody J.E., Nikou C., Colgan B.D., Aston C.A., Labarca R.S., Kischell E., Kanade T. The Otto Aufranc award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin. Orthop. 355:1998;8-22.
5. Paul H., Bargar W., Mittlestadt B. Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 285:1992;57-66.
6. Simon D.A., Jaramaz B., Blackwell M., Morgan F., DiGioia A.M., Kischell E., Colgan B., Kanade T. Development and validation of a navigational guidance system for acetabular implant placement. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 1997;583-592 Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
7. Radermacher K., Portheine F., Anton M., Zimolong A., Kaspers G., Rau G., Staudte H.W. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin. Orthop. 354:1998;28-38.
8. Sati M., de Guise J.A., Drouin G. Computer assisted knee surgery: diagnostics and planning of knee surgery. Comput. Aided Surg. 2:1997;108-123.
9. Haberland N., Ebmeier K., Grunewald J.P., Hliscs R., Kalff R.L. Incorporation of intraoperative computerized tomography in a newly developed spinal navigation technique. Comput. Aided Surg. 5:2000;18-27.
10. Caversaccio M., Bachler R., Ladrach K., Schroth G., Nolte L.P., Hausler R. The "Bernese" frameless optical computer aided surgery system. Comput. Aided Surg. 4:1999;328-334.
11. Winkler D., Vitzthum H.E., Seifert V. Spinal markers: a new method for increasing accuracy in spinal navigation. Comput. Aided Surg. 4:1999;101-104.
12. Bargar W.L., Bauer A., Börner M. Primary and revision total hip replacement using the Robodoc® system. Clin. Orthop. 354:1998;82-91.
13. Amiot L.P., Lang K., Putzier M., Zippel H., Labelle H. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine. 25:2000;606-614.
14. Schwarzenbach O., Berlemann U., Jost B., Visarius H., Arm E., Langlotz F., Nolte L.P., Ozdoba C. Accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement. An in vivo computed tomography analysis. Spine. 22:1997;452-458.
15. Merloz P., Tonetti J., Pittet L., Coulomb M., Lavallee S., Troccaz J., Cinquin P., Sautot P. Computer-assisted spine surgery. Comput. Aided Surg. 3:1998;297-305.
16. Zannoni C., Cappello A., Viceconti M. Optimal CT scanning plan for long-bone 3-D reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 17:1998;663-666.
17. B. Geiger, Three-dimensional modeling of human organs and its application to diagnosis and surgical planning, These de doctorat en sciences, Paris, 1993.
18. Testi D., Zannoni C., Cappello A., Viceconti M. Border-tracing algorithm implementation for the femoral geometry reconstruction. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 65:2001;175-182.
19. Lorensen W.E., Cline H.E. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Comput. Graph. 21:1987;163-169.
20. Schroeder W., Martin K., Lorensen W. The Visualization Toolkit: An Object-Oriented Approach to 3D Graphics. 1997;Prentice Hall, New York.
21. Maintz J.B., Viergever M. A survey of medical image registration. Med. Image Anal. 2:1998;1-36.
22. Moré J.J. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory. Numerical Analysis. 1977;105-116 Springer-Verlag, New York.
23. Besl P., McKay N. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 14:1992;239-256.
24. Draper N.R., Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis. 1966;Wiley & Sons, New York.
25. Grood E., Suntay W. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three dimensional motions: application to the knee. Trans. ASME. 105:1983;136-144.
26. Viceconti M., Casali M., Massari B., Cristofolini L., Bassini S., Toni A. The 'standardized femur program' proposal for a reference geometry to be used for the creation of finite element models of the femur. J. Biomech. 29:1996;1241.
27. Audette M., Ferrie F., Peters T. An algorithmic overview of surface registration techniques for medical imaging. Med. Image Anal. 4:2000;201-217.
28. Nolte L.P., Regazzoni P., DiGioia A.M., Geesink R.G.T. Abstracts from CAOS-International 2001 first annual meeting of the international society for computer assisted orthopaedic surgery. Comput. Aided Surg. 6:(2001):2001;40-63.