|
Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 65-106
|
Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ARTICLE;
BELLOTTI V. BAIRD;
DECISION MAKING;
FEMALE;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
INDUCED ABORTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
JUVENILE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
PARENTAL NOTIFICATION;
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRAL MISSOURI V. DANFORTH;
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA V. CASEY;
ROE V. WADE;
UNITED STATES;
BELLOTTI V. BAIRD;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRAL MISSOURI V. DANFORTH;
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA V. CASEY;
ROE V. WADE;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
ADOLESCENT;
DECISION MAKING;
FEMALE;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
MINORS;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
PARENTAL NOTIFICATION;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0038700764
PISSN: 10958835
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (0)
|