The effect of trajectory on the auditory motion aftereffect

Hearing Research

Volumn 180, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 57-66

  Neelon, Michael F ^a   Jenison, Rick L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Amplitude modulation; Auditory motion; Binaural; Frequency modulation; Motion aftereffect

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BINAURAL HEARING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; SOUND;

EID: 0038699231     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00095-9     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Clarey, J.C., Barone, P., Imig, T.J., 1992. Physiology of thalamus and cortex. In: Popper, A.N., Fay, R.R. (Eds.), The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 232-334.
2. Dong C.J., Swindale N.V., Zakarauskas P., Hayward V., Cynader M.S. The auditory motion aftereffect: Its tuning and specificity in the spatial and frequency domains. Percept. Psychophysiol. 62:2000;1099-1111.
3. Ehrenstein W.H. Auditory aftereffects following simulated motion produced by varying interaural intensity or time. Perception. 23:1994;1249-1255.
4. Grantham D.W. Motion aftereffects with horizontally moving sound sources in the free field. Percept. Psychophysiol. 45:1989;129-136.
5. Grantham, D.W., 1997. Auditory motion perception: Snapshots revisited. In: Gilkey, R.H., Anderson, T.R. (Eds.), Binaural and Spatial Hearing in Real and Virtual Environments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 295-313.
6. Grantham D.W. Auditory motion aftereffects in the horizontal plane: The effects of spectral region, spatial sector and spatial richness. Acta Acoust. 84:1998;337-347.
7. Grantham D.W., Wightman F.L. Auditory motion aftereffects. Percept. Psychophysiol. 26:1979;403-408.
8. Jenison R.L. On acoustic information for auditory motion. Ecol. Psychol. 9:1997;131-151.
9. Jenison, R.L., Neelon, M.F., Reale, R.A., Brugge, J.F., 1998. Synthesis of virtual motion in 3D auditory space. 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 880-885.
10. Joris P.X., Smith P.H., Yin T.C.T. Coincidence detection in the auditory system: 50 years after Jeffress. Neuron. 21:1998;1235-1238.
11. Kashino M., Nishida S. Adaptation in the processing of interaural time differences revealed by the auditory localization aftereffect. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:1998;3597-3604.
12. Kuhn G.F. Model for the interaural time differences in the horizontal plane. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29:1977;988-991.
13. Lutfi R.A., Wang W. Correlational analysis of acoustic cues for the discrimination of auditory motion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106:1999;919-928.
14. Macpherson E.A., Middlebrooks J.C. Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization re revisited. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111:2002;2219-2236.
15. Middlebrooks J.C., Green D.M. Sound localization by human listeners. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 42:1991;135-159.
16. Moore, B.C.J., Glasberg, B.R., 1986. The role of frequency selectivity in the perception of loudness, pitch and time. In: Moore, B.C.J. (Ed.), Frequency Selectivity in Hearing. Academic, London, pp. 251 - 308.
17. Morse, P.M., Ingard, K.U., 1968. Theoretical Acoustics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
18. Neelon, M.F., Jenison, R.L., 2000. Recursive neural network estimation of auditory time-to-contact. 23rd Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg Beach, FL.
19. Niedeggen, M., Wist, E.R., 1998. The physiologic substrate of motion aftereffects. In: Mather, G., Verstraten, F., Anstis, S. (Eds.), The Motion Aftereffect. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 125-156.
20. Perrott D.R., Costantino B., Ball J. Discrimination of moving events which accelerate or decelerate over the listening interval. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:1993;1053-1057.
21. Reinhardt-Rutland A.H. Changing-loudness aftereffect following simulated movement: Implications for channel hypotheses concerning sound level changes and movement. J. Gen. Psychol. 119:1992;113-121.
22. Rosenblum L.D., Carello C., Pastore R.E. Relative effectiveness of three stimulus variables for locating moving sound source. Perception. 16:1987;303-316.
23. Saberi K., Perrott D.R. Minimum audible movement angles as a function of sound source trajectory. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88:1990;2639-2644.
24. Stern R.M., Shear G.D. Lateralization and detection of low-frequency binaural stimuli: Effects of distribution of internal delay. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;2278-2288.
25. Stern, R.M., Trahiotis, C., 1995. Models of binaural interaction. In: Moore, B.C.J. (Ed.), Hearing. Academic Press, New York, pp. 347-386.
26. Shu Z.J., Swindale N.V., Cynader M.S. Spectral motion produces an auditory after-effect. Nature. 364:1993;721-723.
27. Wade, N.J., Verstraten, F.A.J., 1998. Introduction and historical overview. In: Mather, G., Verstraten, F., Anstis, S. (Eds.), The Motion Aftereffect. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1-24.
28. Wightman F.L., Kistler D.J. The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:1992;1648-1661.
29. Wightman, F.L., Kistler, D.J., 1997. Factors affecting the relative salience of sound localization cues. In: Gilkey, R.H., Anderson, T.R. (Eds.), Binaural and Spatial Hearing in Real and Virtual Environments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., pp. 1-23.
30. Wightman F.L., Kistler D.J. Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:1999;2841-2853.
31. Zakarauskas P., Cynader M. Aural intensity for a moving source. Hear. Res. 52:1991;233-244.