Problems with using components in educational software

Computers and Graphics (Pergamon)

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 329-337

  Spalter, Anne Morgan ^a   Van Dam, Andries ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Components; Education; Educational software; Reuse

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; EDUCATION; METADATA; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 0038695875     PISSN: 00978493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0097-8493(03)00027-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Exploratories project. http://www.cs.brown.edu/exploratories/.
2. Laleuf JR, Spalter AM. A component repository for learning objects: a progress report. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Roanoke, VA, USA. June 2001.
3. Szyperski C. Component software. beyond object-oriented programming:1999;Addision-Wesley, New York.
4. Spalter AM, LeGrand M, Taichi S, Simpson RM. Considering a full range of teaching techniques for use in interactive educational software: a practical guide and brainstorming session. In: Proceedings of IEEE Frontiers in Education '00. 2000.
5. Spalter AM, Simpson RM. Integrating interactive computer-based learning experiences into established curricula. In: Proceedings of ACM ITiCSE (Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education). 2000.
6. http://e-slate.cti.gr/.
7. Web/comp project: Andrea A. diSessa. http://dewey.soe.berkeley.edu/boxer/webcomp/index.html.
8. NSF NSDL (National Science Digital Library) program. http://www.smete.org/nsdl/projects/index.html.
9. Ariadne Foundation. http://www.ariadne-eu.org/.
10. The IrYdium Project. DaveYaron, Carnegie Mellon. http://ir.chem.cmu.edu/irproject/.
11. Drexel University Math Forum. http://www.mathforum.com.
12. ComponentSource. http://www.componentsource.com/ and http://www.componentsource.com/Welcome/NewVisitor/WhyBuyFromComponentSource.asp for their testing statement.
13. AgentSheets. http://www.agentsheets.com/. http://agentsheets.cs.colorado.edu/Behavior-Exchange/Home.
14. Poulin. JS. Been there, done that. In: CACM (Communications of the ACM), vol. 42(5). May 1999.
15. BEA Systems success story. http://www.componentsource.com/SellComponents/SuccessStories/BEASystems.asp.
16. SEI (Software Engineering Institute), Carnegie Mellon. A Framework for Software Product Line Practice - Version 3.0. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/plp/framework.html.
17. Agresti W.W., Evanco W.M. Projecting software defects from analyzing ada designs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(11):1992;988-997.
18. van Dam A. Reflections on next generation educational software. In: Enseigner L'lnformatique: Mélanges en Hommage à Bernard Levrat, Christian Pellegrini and Alain Jacquesson editors. Georg Editeur, 2000. pp. 153-166. http://www.cs.brown.edu/people/avd/LevratPaper.html.
19. Holsapple CW, Joshi KD. A collaborative approach to ontology design. In: Communications of the ACM. New York, NY, USA. February 2002.
20. ESCOT (Educational Software Components of Tomorrow). http://www.escot.org/.
21. Merlot. http://www.merlot.org/.