Quantifying long-term environmental regulatory risk for brownfields: Are reopeners really an issue?

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 257-269

  Simons, Robert A ^a   Pendergrass, John ^b   Winson Geideman, Kimberly ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ENVIRONMENTAL LAW INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROWNFIELD SITE; CONTAMINATED LAND; ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; LAND USE PLANNING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038694593     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0964056032000070945     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bartsch, C. (2000) Reuse benefits, state by state, Brownfield News, 4(1), pp. 28-37.
2. Bartsch, C. & Collaton, E. (1997) Brownfields: Cleaning and Reusing Contaminated Properties (Westport, CT, Praeger).
3. Bartsch, C. & Dorfman, B. (2000) Brownfields and Housing: How are State VCPs Encouraging Residential Development? (Washington, DC, Northeast-Midwest Institute).
4. Council on Urban Economic Development (1999) Brownfields Redevelopment Performance Evaluation (Washington, DC, Council on Urban Economic Development).
5. Davis, T.S. (Ed) (2002) Brownfields: A Comprehensive Guide to Redeveloping Contaminated Property, 2nd edition (Chicago, IL, ABA Press).
6. De Sousa, C. (2000) Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield development: a private sector perspective on the costs and risks associated with brownfield redevelopment in the Greater Toronto area, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(6), pp. 831-853.
7. Environmental Law Institute (1995) Analysis of State Superfund Programs 50 State Study (Washington, DC, Environmental Law Institute).
8. Environmental Law Institute (1998) An Analysis of State Superfund Programs 50 State Study (Washington, DC, Environmental Law Institute).
9. Environmental Law Institute (1999) A Guidebook for Brownfield Property Owners (Washington, DC, Environmental Law Institute).
10. Jackson, T. (2001) Environmental risk perceptions of commercial and industrial real estate lenders, Journal of Real Estate Research, 22(3), pp. 271-288.
11. Meyer, P.B. & Lyons, T.S. (2000) Lessons from private sector brownfield redevelopers: planning public support for urban regeneration, APA Journal, 66(1), pp. 46-57.
12. Page, W. (1997) Contaminated Sites and Environmental Cleanup: International Approaches to Prevention, Remediation, and Reuse (New York, Academic Press).
13. Pendergrass, J.A. (1999) Sustainable redevelopment of brownfields: using institutional controls to protect public health, Environmental Law Reporter, 29, pp. 10243-10258.
14. Schriner, J. (1998) Brownfields still too risky: unless states cut risks, firms won't build on contaminated land, Industry Week, 2 March.
15. Simons, R.A. (1998a) Turning Brownfields into Greenbacks: Redeveloping and Financing Contaminated Urban Real Estate (Washington, DC, Urban Land Institute).
16. Simons, R.A. (1998b) How many brownfields are out there: an economic base contraction analysis of 31 US cities, Public Works Management and Policy, 2(3), pp. 267-273.
17. Simons, R.A. & El Jaouhari, A. (2001) Local government intervention in the brownfields arena, Economic Development Commentary, 25(3), pp. 12-18.
18. US Conference of Mayors (1996) Impact of Brownfields on US Cities: A 39-city Survey (Washington, DC, US Conference of Mayors).
19. US Conference of Mayors (1999) Recycling America's Land 1999 Version (Washington, DC, US Conference of Mayors).