The Headache Impact Test®1 and the Short Pain Inventory©: Outcome measures compared

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Medicine

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 23-32

  Kilminster, Shaun G ^a,d   Dowson, Andrew ^b   Bundy, Mike ^c  

^a ROYAL SURREY COUNTY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c Cranleigh Health Centre   (United Kingdom)

^d Tees Esk and Wear Valley NHS Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING;

EID: 0038691998     PISSN: 13649027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00124363-200317010-00008     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Puranik S, Fozard J, Paremain G, et al. A randomised single blind study to evaluate the effects of action potential simulator therapy compared with placebo in patients with chronic back pain. Pain Clin 2002; 14: 69-73
2. The Headache Impact Test™ [online]. Available from URL: http://www.amIhealthy.com [Accessed 2003 Feb 5]
3. The Headache Impact Test™ [online]. Available from URL: http://www.qualitymetric.com/innohome/inhit6.shtml [Accessed 2003 Feb 5]
4. Melzack R. The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975; 1: 277-91
5. Kilminster SG, Power M, Fozard JR. Survey of pain in two medical and dental clinics, with non patient controls using the Short Pain Inventory. Int J Pharm Med 2000; 14: 137-47
6. How much are headaches disrupting your life [online]? Available from URL: http://www.headachetest.com [Accessed 2003 Feb 5]
7. SF-36.org: a community for measuring health outcomes using SF tools [online]. Available from URL: http://www.sf36.com [Accessed 2003 Feb 5]
8. What is HIT [online]? Available from URL: http://www.amihealthy.com/Static/HITInfo.asp [Accessed 2003 Feb 5]
9. Ware JE, Bjorner JB, Kosinski M. Practical implications of item response theory (IRT) and computer adaptive testing: a brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Med Care 2000; 38 Suppl. II: II73-82
10. Jhingram P, Osterhaus JT, Miller DW, et al. Development and validation of migraine-specific quality of life questionniare. Headache 1998; 38: 295-302
11. Jacobson GP, Ranmadan NM, Norris L, et al. Headache Disability Inventory (HDI): short-term test-retest reliability and spouse perceptions. Headache 1995; 35: 534-9
12. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Simon D, et al. Validity of an illness severity measure of headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain 1999; 79: 291-301
13. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Whyte J, et al. An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score. Neurology 1999; 53: 988-94
14. Kilminster SG. Manual: the short pain inventory. West Sussex: Lawrencian Clinical Ltd, 2003
15. Kilminster SG, Mould P. Comparison of the internal reliability and validity of the McGill Pain Questionnaire and Short Pare Inventory. Int J Pharm Med 2002; 16: 87-95
16. Kilminster SG, Mould GP. Comparison of diclofenac spray and gel on knee joints of patients with osteoarthritic pain. Clin Drug Invest 1999; 18: 345-54
17. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias, and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1992; 12: 229-37
18. The Enropean Medicine Evaluation Agency (EMEA). Notes for guidance on clinical investigation of medicinal products for the treatment of migraine. CPMP/EWP/788/01 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.emea.eu.int/ [Accessed 2002 Sep 19]
19. Dowson A. Assessing the impact of migraine. Curr Med Res Opin 2001; 17: 298-309