Automatic registration of MR and SPECT images for treatment planning in prostate cancer

Academic Radiology

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 673-684

  Lee, Zhenghong ^a   Nagano, Kenichi K ^b   Duerk, Jeffrey L ^a,b   Bruce Sodee, D ^a   Wilson, David L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Images, processing; Monoclonal antibodies; Prostate neoplasms, MR; Prostate neoplasms, radionuclide studies

Indexed keywords

CAPROMAB PENDETIDE IN 111;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; PROSTATE CANCER; REGISTRATION; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0038689335     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80088-0     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Weber DA, Ivanovic M. Correlative image registration. Semin Nucl Med 1994; 24:311-323.
2. Pelizzari CA, Chen GTY, Spelbring DR, Weichselbaum RR, Chen CT. Accurate three-dimensional registration of CT, PET, and/or MR images of the brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989; 13:20-26.
3. Woods RP, Mazziotta JC, Cherry SR. MRI-PET registration with automated algorithm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:536-546.
4. Studholme C, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ. Automated 3-D registration of MR and CT images of the head. Med Image Anal 1996; 1:163-175.
5. Wells WM III, Viola P, Atsumi H, Nakajima S, Kikinis R. Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Image Anal 1996; 1:35-51.
6. West JB, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY, et al. Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality image registration techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:554-566.
7. Fitzpatrick JM, Hill DLG, Shyr Y, West JB, Studholme C, Maurer CR. Visual assessment of the accuracy of retrospective registration of MR and CT images of the brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17:571-585.
8. Eberl S, Kanno I, Fulton RR, Ryan A, Hutton BF, Fulham MJ. Automatic interstudy image registration technique for SPECT and PET. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:137-145.
9. Pohjonen H, Savolainen S, Nikkinen P, et al. Abdominal SPECT/MRI fusion applied to the study of splenic and hepatic uptake of radiolabeled thrombocytes and colloids. Ann Nucl Med 1996; 10:409-417.
10. Hamilton RJ, Blend MJ, Pelizzari CA, Milliken BD, Vijayakumar S. Using vascular structure for CT-SPECT registration in the pelvis. J Nucl Med 1999; 40:347-351.
11. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16:187-198.
12. Sodee DB, Ellis RJ, Samuels MA, et al. Prostate cancer and prostate bed SPECT imaging with ProstaScint: semiquantitative correlation with prostatic biopsy results. Prostate 1998; 37:140-148.
13. Ellis RJ, Sodee DB, Spirnak JP, et al. Feasibility and acute toxicities of radioimmunoguided prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 48:683-687.
14. Fei B, Wheaton A, Lee Z, Duerk JL, Wilson DL. Registration of MR images of the prostate. Phys Med Biol 2002; 47:823-838.
15. Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994; 14: 601-609.
16. Smothers CD. Current role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating prostatic carcinoma. Appl Radiol 1998; 27:5-10.
17. Carrillo A, Duerk JL, Lewin JS, Wilson DL. Semiautomatic 3-D image registration as applied to interventional MRI liver cancer treatment. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000; 19:175-185.
18. Likear B, Pernus F. Registration of serial transverse sections of muscle fibers. Cytometry 1999; 37:93-106.
19. Slomka PJ, Dey D, Przetak C, Baum R. Automatic 3D spatial integration of [F-18]-FDG whole body PET with CT (abstr). J Nucl Med 2000; 41 (suppl):59.
20. Hill DL, Batchelor PG, Holden M, Hawkes DJ. Medical image registration. Phys Med Biol 2001; 46:1-45.
21. Studholme C, Novotny E, Zubal IG, Duncan JS. Estimating tissue deformation between functional images induced by intracranial electrode implantation using anatomical MRI. Neuroimage 2001; 13:561-576.
22. Seltzer MA, Barbaric Z, Belldegrun A, et al. Comparison of helical computerized tomography, positron emission tomography and monoclonal antibody scans for evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate specific antigen relapse after treatment for localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1999; 162:1322-1328.
23. Malone S, Crook JM, Kendal WS, Szanto J. Respiratory-induced prostate motion: quantification and characterization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 48:105-109.
24. Pluim JPW, Maintz JBA, Viergever MA. Image registration by maximization of combined mutual information and gradient information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000; 19:809-814.
25. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in C. 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1992; 412-419.
26. Zhu Y-M. Volume image registration by cross-entropy optimization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002; 21:174-180.
27. Zhu Y-M, Cochoff SM. Influence of implementation parameters on mutual information image registration of MR/SPECT brain images. J Nucl Med 2002; 43:160-166.
28. Skouson MB, Guo Q, Liang Z-P. A bound on mutual information for image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002; 20:843-846.