Introduction to the Feature on Problematic Data

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 279-281

  Roth, Philip L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038686152     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428103255531     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330-351.
2. McClelland, G. (2000). Nasty data: Unruly, ill-mannered observations can ruin your analysis. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 393-411). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Roth, P. L., & Switzer, F. S., III (2002). Outliers and influential cases: Handling those discordant contaminated maverick rogues. In S. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of methods in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 297-309). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
4. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
5. Sinharary, S., Stern, H. S., & Russell, D. D. (2001). The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data. Psychological Methods, 6, 317-329.
6. Switzer, F. S., III, Roth, P. L., & Switzer, D. M. (1998). Systematic data loss in HRM settings: A Monte Carlo analysis. Journal of Management, 24, 763-779.