Pragmatic applications of the Semantic Web using SemTalk

Computer Networks

Volumn 42, Issue 5 SPEC., 2003, Pages 599-615

  Fillies, Christian ^a   Wood Albrecht, Gay ^b   Weichhardt, Frauke ^c  

^a Semtation GmbH   (Germany)

^b Bonapart Solutions   (United States)

^c Beratung Im Netz   (Germany)

Author keywords

Business process modeling; Data warehouse; Documentation; Glossary and ontologies; Human factors and standardization

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; SEARCH ENGINES; WEBSITES;

ONTOLOGY;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 0038683249     PISSN: 13891286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1389-1286(03)00223-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, O. Lassila, A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities, Scientific American (May 2001).
2. C. Fillies, F. Weichhardt, SemTalk: A RDFS Editor for Visio 2000, Position Paper, ICCS 2001 9th International Conference on Conceptual Structures/Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS).
3. C. Fillies, G. Wood-Albrecht, F. Weichhardt, A pragmatic application of the Semantic Web using SemTalk, WWW2002, 7-11 May 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ACM 1-5811-449-5/02/0005.
4. Information Management Gesellschaft, PROMET 1994; Österle, Business Engineering 1, 1995; Österle/Vogler, Praxis des Workflow-Managements, 1996.
5. Krallmann H., Feiten L., Hoyer R., Kölzer G. Die Kommunikationsstrukturanalyse (KSA) - Zur Konzeption einer betrieblichen Kommunikationsarchitektur. Kurbel K., Mertens P., Scheer A.W. Interaktive betriebswirtschaftliche Informations- und Kommunikationssysteme. 1989;Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
6. M. Dörr, N. Guarino, M. Fernández López, E. Schulten, M. Stefanova, A. Tate, State of the Art in Content Standards, OntoWeb Deliverable 3.1. www.ontoweb.org/download/deliverables/D3.1.pdf, November 2001.
7. Kifer M., Lausen G., Wu J. Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages. Journal of the ACM. 4(2):1995;741-843.
8. S. Decker, D. Brickley, J. Saarela, J. Angele, A query service for RDF, Query Languages 98, W3C Workshop.
9. G. Heyer, M. Läuter, U. Quasthoff, Th. Wittig, Chr. Wolff, Learning relations using collocations, in: A. Maedche, S. Staab, C. Nedellec, E. Hovy (Eds.), Proc. IJCAI Workshop on Ontology Learning, Seattle, WA, 19-24 August 2001.
10. Gruber T. Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 43:1995;907-928.
11. S. Staab, H.-P. Schnurr, R. Studer, Y. Sure, Knowledge processes and ontologies, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on Knowledge Management, 16(1) (2001).
12. Booch G., Rumbaugh J., Jacobson I. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. 1999;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
13. W3C, RDF Schema Specification, http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdf-schema/, 1999.
14. O. Lassila, R. Swick, Resource description framework (RDF). Model and syntax specification, Technical report, W3C, 1999. W3C Recommendation. Available from: < http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax>.
15. WordNet, cf. http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/̃wn/.
16. D.G. Bobrow, L.G. DeMichiel, R.P. Gabriel, S.E. Keene, G. Kiczales, D.A. Moon, Common Lisp Object System Specification, X3J13 Document 88-002R, ACM SIGPLAN Notices 23 (1988).
17. Kempf R., Stelzner M. Teaching object-oriented programming with the KEE system. ACM SIGPLAN Notices. 22(12):1987;11-25.
18. TM Software Development System User's Manual, IntelliCorp, Mountain View, California, USA, July 1985.
19. http://protege.stanford.edu/.
20. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/.
21. http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/̃horrocks/FaCT/.
22. http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/annotation/ontomat.html.
23. http://wim.fzi.de/vision/.
24. http://www.daml.org/services/.