|
|
|
Volumn 35, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 951-992
|
|
Patient advocates or patient adversaries? Using fiduciary law to compel disclosure of managed care financial incentives.
a
a
LLP
(United States)
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CAPITATION FEE;
COLON TUMOR;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
ECONOMICS;
ETHICS;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
MALPRACTICE;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MOORE V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
MOTIVATION;
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT;
TRUST;
UNITED STATES;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MOORE V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
ADULT;
CAPITATION FEE;
COLONIC NEOPLASMS;
DISCLOSURE;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE RATIONING;
HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
MALPRACTICE;
MOTIVATION;
PHYSICIAN INCENTIVE PLANS;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;
TRUST;
UNITED STATES;
|
|
EID: 0038682825
PISSN: 00364037
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (6)
|
|
References (0)
|
