Practical scheme for optimal measurement in quantum interferometric devices

Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics

Volumn 313, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 16-20

  Takeoka, Masahiro ^a   Ban, Masashi ^b   Sasaki, Masahide ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b HITACHI LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

Interferometry; Quantum Neyman Pearson hypothesis testing; Quantum optimal measurement

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS; DETECTION SCHEME; INTERFEROMETRIC SENSING; NEYMAN-PEARSON HYPOTHESIS TESTING; OPTIMAL MEASUREMENTS; PHASE SHIFT DETECTION; PRACTICAL SCHEMES; PROBE FIELD;

INTERFEROMETRY;

ARTICLE; DEVICE; HYPOTHESIS; INTERFEROMETRY; MATERIAL STATE; MEASUREMENT; PROBABILITY; QUANTUM MECHANICS;

EID: 0038681980     PISSN: 03759601     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0375-9601(03)00719-9     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. A.S. Lane, S.L. Braunstein, C.M. Caves, Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993) 1667.
2. M.G. Paris, Phys. Lett. A 225 (1997) 23.
3. G.M. D'Ariano, M.G.A. Paris, P. Perinotti, Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 062106.
4. J. Neyman, E. Pearson, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 231 (1933) 289.
5. R.S. Kennedy, Quarterly Progress Report No. 108, Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT, 1973 p. 219.
6. C.W. Helstrom, Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory, Academic Press, New York, 1976.
7. K. Banaszek, K. Wodkiewicz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 2009.
8. L. Mandel, E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995.
9. C. Kim, P. Kumar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 1605.