Visual instrument image-quality assessment with rotationally symmetric difference of Gaussians

Applied Optics

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 1667-1670

  Mouroulis, Pantazis ^a,b   Cheng, Xiaoxue ^a  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038679050     PISSN: 1559128X     EISSN: 21553165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1364/AO.36.001667     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. I. Overington, “The importance of coherence of coupling when viewing through visual aids, ” Opt. Laser Technol. 5, 216-220 (1973).
2. G. J. Burton and N. D. Haig, “Effects of the Seidel aberrations on visual target discrimination, ” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 373-385 (1984).
3. N. D. Haig and G. J. Burton, “Effects of wave-front aberration on visual instrument performance and a consequential test technique, ” Appl. Opt. 26, 492-500 (1987).
4. P. Mouroulis and H. Zhang, “Visual instrument image quality metrics and the effects of coma and astigmatism, ” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 34-42 (1992).
5. P. Mouroulis andX. Cheng, “Robustness of visual image quality measures against various monochromatic aberrations, ” Opt. Eng. 33, 2626-2631 (1994).
6. D. Regan, “A brief review of some of the stimuli and analysis methods used in spatiotemporal vision research, ” in Spatial Vision, D. Regan, ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1991).
7. K. Lyons, P. Mouroulis, and D. Cheng, “Effect of instrumental spherical aberration on visual image quality, ” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 193-205 (1996).
8. P. Mouroulis, T. Kim, and G. Zhao, “Transverse color tolerances for visual optical systems, ” Appl. Opt. 32, 7089-7094 (1993).