Comments on noise and resolution of the DenOptix radiography system

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 746-751

  Couture, Rex A ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DEVICE; GINGIVA; IMAGING SYSTEM; PHANTOM; RADIOGRAPHY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 0038674954     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/moe.2003.245     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Attaelmanan AG, Borg E, Grondahl HG. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;91:611-5.
2. Kitagawa H, Farman AG, Scheetz JP, Brown WP, Lewis J, Benefiel M, et al. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphorphosphor systems using subjective image quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:272-6.
3. Couture RA, Hildebolt C. Quantitative dental radiography with a new photostimulable phosphor system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:498-508.
4. Couture RA, Hildebolt CF. Precise image-receptor calibration and monitoring of beam quality with a step wedge. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:56-62.
5. DenOptix ToolKit Sample Application [computer program]. Version 10-6-98. Hayward, Calif: ALARA, Inc; 1998.
6. VixWin 2000 [computer program]. Version 1.2. Des Plaines (IL): Gendex Dental Systems; 2000.
7. Rasband W. ImageJ [computer program]. Version 1.25s. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health; 2002.
8. Dainty JC, Shaw R. Image science: principles, analysis and evaluation of photographic-type imaging processes. London: Academic Press; 1974.
9. Brettle DS, Workman A, Ellwood RP, Launders JH, Horner K, Davies RM. The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography. Br J Radiol 1996;69:256-61.
10. Yoshiura K, Stamatakis HC, Welander U, McDavid WD, Shi XQ, Ban S, et al. Physical evaluation of a system for direct digital intra-oral radiography based on a charge-coupled device. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:277-83.
11. Vandre RH, Pajak JC, Abdel-Nabi H, Farman TT, Farman AG. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:216-22.
12. Workman A, Brettle DS. Physical performance measures of radiographic imaging systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:139-46.
13. Borg E, Attaelmanan A, Grondahl HG. Image plate systems differ in physical performance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:118-24.