National Standards and School Science and Mathematics

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 97, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 325-334

  Bybee, Rodger W ^a   Ferrini Mundy, Joan ^b   Loucks Horsley, Susan ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038672355     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17282.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ball, D. L. (1997). Developing mathematics reform: What don't we know about teacher learning—but would make good working hypotheses. In S. N. Freil & G. W. Bright (Eds.). Reflecting on our work: NSF teacher enhancement in K-6 mathematics (pp. 77–112). Lanham, MD: University Press of America, Inc.
2. Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Burrill, G., & Kennedy, D. (1997). Improving student learning in mathematics and science: The role of national standards in state policy Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Bybee, R. W. (1997). A strategy for standards-based reform of science and mathematics education Unpublished manuscript.
5. Bybee. R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatti, B., & Perlwitz, M. (1991). Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(1), 3–29.
7. Collins, A. (1995). National science education standards in the United States: A process and a product. Studies in Science Education, 26, 7–37.
8. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (Eds.) (1985). Children's ideas in science Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
9. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., and Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas London: Routledge.
10. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T.P., Franke, M.L., Levy, L., Jacob, V.R., & Empson, S.B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 393–425.
11. Harvard Committee. (1945). General education in a free society Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Hiebert J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse in students in second grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 301, 393–425.
13. Hutchinson, J., & Huberman, M. (1993, May). Knowledge dissemination and use in science and mathematics education: A literature review Prepared for the Directorate of Education and Human Resources, Division of Research, Evaluation and Dissemination, National Science Foundation by The Network.
14. McGilly, K. (Ed.) (1994). Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
15. McLeod, D. B., Stake, R. E., Schappelle, B. P., Mellissinos, M., & Gierl, M. J. (1996). Setting the standards: NCTM's role in the reform of mathematics education. In S. A. Raizen & E. D. Britton (Eds.), Bold ventures, case studies of U. S. innovations in mathematics education (pp. 13–133). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
16. National Center for Educational Statistics. (1996). Pursuing excellence: A study of U.S. eighth grade mathematics and science teaching, learning, curriculum, and achievement in international context Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
17. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics Reston, VA: Author.
18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics Reston, VA: Author.
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics Reston, VA: Author.
20. National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. National Research Council. (1997). High school mathematics at work Manuscript in preparation.
22. Osbourne, R. & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
23. Roberts, D. (1995). Scientific literacy: The importance of multiple “curriculum emphases” In R. W. Bybee and J. D. McInerney (Eds.). Redesigning the science curriculm: A report on the implications of standards and benchmarks for science education, pp. 75–80. Colorado Springs, CO: Biological Sciences Curriculum Study.
24. Romberg, T. A. (1992). The scholarly basis of the school mathematics reform in the U.S. International Journal of Education Reform, 17(95), 419–437.
25. Schmidt, W. H., Jorde, D., Cogan, L. S., Barrier, E., Gonzalo, I., Moser, U., Shimizu, K., Sawada, T., Valverde, G. A., McKnight, C., Prawat, R. S., Wiley, D. E., Raizen, S. A., Britton, E. D., & Wolfe, R. G. (1996). Characterizing pedagogical flow: An investigation of mathematics and science teaching in six countries Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
26. Schmidt, W., C. McKnight & S. Raizen (1997). Splintered vision: An investigation of U. S. science and mathematics education. Executive summary East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, U. S. National Research Center for the Third International Mathematics and Science Study.
27. Schoen, H. L. (1988). NCTM 9–12 Standards: Reflections from research Paper presented at the Research Presession of the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Chicago.
28. Steen, L. A. (Ed.). (1990). On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. Stigler, J., & Stevenson, H. (1992). The learning gap New York: Touchstone.
30. Walberg, H. (1991). Educational effectiveness: Psychological problems and possibilities. In T. Husen and J. Keeves (Eds.), Issues in science education New York: Pergamon Press.
31. Watts, G. D., & Castle, S. (1993). The time dilemma in school restructuring. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 306–310.
32. White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding New York: Taylor & Francis.