Lateralized warning tones produce typical irrelevant-location effects on choice reactions

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 124-129

  Proctor, Robert W ^a,c   Pick, David F ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY CALUMET   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038671537     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03209467     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. AREND, U., & WANDMACHER, J. (1987). On the generality of logical recoding in spatial inference tasks. Acta Psychologica, 65, 193-210.
2. DE JONG, R., LIANG, C.-C., & LAUBER, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 731-750.
3. EIMER, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 837-854.
4. GLASER, M. O., & GLASER, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 875-894.
5. HASBROUCQ, T., & GUIARD, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 246-266.
6. HEDGE, A., & MARSH, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427-439.
7. HOMMEL, B., & PRINZ, W. (EDS.) (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
8. LU, C.-H. (1997). Correspondence effects for irrelevant information in choice-reaction tasks: Characterizing the S-R relations and the processing dynamics. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in S-R compatibility (pp. 85-117). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
9. LU, C.-H., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1994). Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 286-298.
10. LU, C.-H., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
11. RAGOT, R., & FIORI, N. (1994). Mental processing during reactions toward and away from a stimulus: An ERP analysis of auditory congruence and S-R compatibility. Psychophysiology, 31, 439-446.
12. RAGOT, R., & GUIARD, Y. (1992). Stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility: Two variables disentangled in an auditory RT task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 219-232.
13. SIMON, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
14. SIMON, J. R., ACOSTA, E., JR., & MEWALDT, S. P. (1975). Effect of locus of warning tone on auditory choice reaction time. Memory & Cognition, 3, 167-170.
15. SIMON, J. R., & RUDELL, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant location cue on information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 300-304.
16. SIMON, J. R., SLY, P. E., & VILAPAKKAM, S. (1981). Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reaction toward the stimulus source. Acta Psychologica, 47, 63-81.
17. STOFFELS, E. J., VAN DER MOLEN, M. W., & KEUSS, P. J. G. (1989). An additive factors analysis of the effects of location cues associated with auditory stimuli on stages of information processing. Acta Psychologica, 70, 161-197.
18. SUGG, M. J., & MCDONALD, J. E. (1994). Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 647-675.
19. UMILTÀ, C., & NICOLETTI, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 89-116). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
20. WANG, H., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1996). Stimulus-response compatibility as a function of stimulus code and response modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1201-1217.