Symbiosis and synergy? Scenarios, task analysis and reuse of HCI knowledge

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 15, Issue 2 SPEC., 2003, Pages 245-263

  Sutcliffe, Alistair ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive affordances; Design process; Generic models; Knowledge reuse; Scenarios; Task analysis

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

GENERIC TASK MODELS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0038670230     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00002-X     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Alexander I. Initial industrial experience of misuse cases in trade-off analysis. Proceedings of RE-02 IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering, Essen. 2002;IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
2. Alexander C., Ishikawa S., Silverstein M. A Pattern Language. 1977;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Annett J. Recent developments in hierarchical task analysis. Robertson S.A. Contemporary Ergonomics. 1996;Taylor Francis, London.
4. Basili V.R., Weiss D.M. A methodology for collecting valid software engineering data. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 10:(6):1984;728-738.
5. Bellotti V. Implications of current design practice for the use of HCI techniques. Jones D.M., Winder R.L. People and Computers, IV: HCI-88. 1988;79-96 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Benyon D., Macaulay C. Scenarios and the HCI-SE design problems. Interacting with Computers. 14:(4):2002;397-405.
7. Borchers J. A Pattern Approach to Interaction Design. 2001;Chichester, Wiley.
8. Breuker J., Van Der Velde W. CommonKADS Library for Expertise Modelling. 1994;IOS Press, Amsterdam.
9. Buckingham Shum S. Analyzing the usability of a design rationale notation. Moran T.P., Carroll J.M. Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques and Use. 1996;185-215 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. Carey T. Commentary on 'Scenarios and task analysis' by Dan Diaper. Interacting with Computer. 14:(4):2002;411-412.
11. Carroll J.M. Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. 1995;Wiley, New York.
12. Carroll J.M. Making Use: Scenario-based Design of Human-Computer interactions. 2000;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Carroll J.M. Making use is more than a matter of task analysis. Interacting with Computers. 14:(5):2002;619-627.
14. Carroll J.M., Rosson M.B. Getting around the task-artifact framework: How to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 10:(2):1992;181-212.
15. Carroll J.M., Singley M.K., Rosson M.B. Integrating theory development with design evaluation. Behaviour and Information Technology. 11:1992;247-255.
16. Cockburn A. Writing Effective use Cases. 2001;Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
17. Conklin J., Begeman M.L. GIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems. 64:1988;303-331.
18. Dearden A., Harrison M., Wright P. Allocation of function: scenarios, context and the economies of effort. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 52:(2):2000;289-318.
19. Diaper D. Task analysis for knowledge descriptions (TAKD): a requiem for a method. Behaviour and Information Technology. 20:(3):1999;199-212.
20. Diaper D. Scenarios and task analysis. Interacting with Computers. 14:(4):2002;379-395.
21. Diaper D., Johnson P. Task analysis for knowledge descriptions: theory and application in training. Long J., Whitefield A. Cognitive Ergonomics for Human-Computer Interaction. 1989;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Dix A., Mancini R. Specifying history and backtracking mechanism. Palanque P., Paterno F. Formal Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. 1998;1-23 Springer, London.
23. Djajadiningrat J.P., Gaver W.W., Frens J.W. Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: Methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. Boyarski D., Kellogg W.A. Conference Proceedings: DIS2000 Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices Methods and Techniques. 2000;66-71 ACM Press, New York.
24. Dowell J., Long J.L. A conception of the cognitive engineering design problem. Ergonomics. 41:(2):1998;126-139.
25. Duke D.J., Harrison M.D. Unifying views of interactors. Proceedings: Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI'94, Bari, Italy. 1994;ACM Press, New York.
26. Eason K.D., Harker S.D.P., Olphert C.W. Representing socio-technical systems options in the development of new forms of work organisation. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology. 5:(3):1996;399-420.
27. Frakes W.B. Kent A., Williams J.G. Software Reuse. 1995;179-184 Marcel Dekker, New York.
28. Graham L. Task scripts, use cases and scenarios in object oriented analysis. Object-Oriented Systems. 3:1996;123-142.
29. Guindon, R., 1987. A model of cognitive processes in software design: An analysis of breakdowns in early design activities by individuals. MCC Technical Report STP-283-87. Austin, TX: Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation.
30. Guindon R., Curtis B. Control of cognitive processes during software design: What tools are needed. Soloway E., Frye D., Sheppard S.B. Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 88 Conference Proceedings. 1988;263-269 ACM Press, New York.
31. Hampton J.A. Disjunction in natural categories. Memory and Cognition. 16:1988;579-591.
32. ISO, 1997. ISO 9241: Ergonomic requirements for office systems with visual display terminals (VDTs). International Standards Organisation.
33. Jacobson I., Christerson M., Jonsson P., Overgaard G. Object-oriented Software Engineering: A Use-case Driven Approach. 1992;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
34. Johnson P., Johnson H., Waddington R., Shouls R. Jones D.M., Winder R. Task-related Knoledge Structures: Analysis, Modelling and Application, Proceedings: HCI'88. 1988;35-61 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
35. Johnson-Laird P.N., Wason P.C. Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science. 1983;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
36. Kaindl H. An integration of scenarios with their purposes in task modelling. Olson G.M., Schuon S. Designing Interactive Systems: DIS 95 Conference Proceedings, Ann Arbor, MI. 1995;227-235 ACM Press, New York.
37. Kuutti K. Workprocess: scenarios as a preliminary vocabulary. Carroll J.M. Scenario Based Design. 1995;Wiley, New York.
38. Kyng M. Creating contexts for design. Carroll J.M. Scenario Based Design. 1995;85-108 Wiley, New York.
39. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. 1999;Basic Books, New York.
40. MacLean, A., McKerlie, D., 1995. Design space analysis and user-representations (Technical Report EPC-1995-102). Cambridge: Xerox Research Centre Europe.
41. MacLean A., Young R.M., Bellotti V., Moran T.P. Questions, options and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction. 6:(3/4):1991;201-250.
42. Monk A.G., Wright P. Improving Your Human-computer Interface: A Practical Technique. 1993;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
43. Mylopoulos J., Chung L., Yu E. From object-oriented to goal-oriented requirements analysis. Communications of the ACM. 42:(1):1999;31-37.
44. Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. 1993;Academic Press, London.
45. Norman D.A. The Invisible Computer: Why Good Products Can Fail, the Personal Computer is so Complex, and Information Appliances are the Solution. 1999;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
46. Olson G.M., Olson J.S. Groupware and computer supported cooperative work. Jacko J.A., Sears A. The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. 2002;583-595 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
47. Paterno F. Model-based Design and Evaluation of Interactive Applications. 1999;Springer, Berlin.
48. Paterno F. Commentary on scenarios and task analysis by Dan Diaper. Interacting with Computers. 14:(4):2002;407-409.
49. Potts C., Takahashi K., Anton A.I. Inquiry-based requirements analysis. IEEE Software. 11:(2):1994;21-32.
50. Rasmussen J. Information Processing in Human-Computer Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering. 1986;Amsterdam, North Holland.
51. Rodriquez F.G., Scapin D. Editing MAD* task description for specifying user interfaces at both semantic and presentation levels. Harrison M.D., Torres J.C. Conference Proceedings: DSVIS 97: Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems, Granada Spain. 1997;193-208 Springer, Berlin.
52. Rolland C., Achour C.B., Cauvet C., Ralyte J., Sutcliffe A.G., Maiden N.A.M., et al. A proposal for a scenario classification framework. Requirements Engineering. 3:(1):1998;23-47.
53. Rosch E., Mervis C.B., Gray W., Johnson D., Boyes-Braem P. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology. 7:1976;573-605.
54. Rosson M.B., Carroll J.M. Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human-Computer Interaction. 2001;Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
55. Shneiderman B. Designing the user Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. third ed. 1998;Addison-Wesley/Longman.
56. Simon H.A. The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence. 4:1973;181-201.
57. Sutcliffe A.G. Task analysis, system analysis and design: Symbiosis or synthesis. Interacting with Computers. 1:(1):1989;6-12.
58. Sutcliffe A.G. Human-Computer Interface Design. second ed:1995;Macmillan, London.
59. Sutcliffe A.G. Task Related Information Analysis. Benyon D., Palanque P. Proceedings: IFIP 13.2/2.7 Workshop on Methods and Design Architectures for User Interface Design. 1995.
60. Sutcliffe A.G. Task-related information analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 47:(2):1997;223-257.
61. Sutcliffe A.G. Bridging the communications gap: developing a lingua franca for software developers and users. Actes du XVIIIe Congres: INFORSID, Lyon. 2000;Inforsid, Toulouse.
62. Sutcliffe A.G. On the effective use and reuse of HCI knowledge. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 7:(2):2000;197-221.
63. Sutcliffe A.G. The Domain Theory: Patterns for Knowledge and Software Reuse. 2002;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
64. Sutcliffe A.G. Modelling collaboration in loosely coupled inter-organisational relationships. Systems Engineering for Business Process Change: Collected Papers from the EPSRC Research Programme. 2002;Springer, London.
65. Sutcliffe A.G., Carroll J.M. Generalizing claims and reuse of HCI knowledge. Johnson H., Nigay L., Roast C. People and Computers XIII; Proceedings: BCS-HCI Conference, Sheffield 1-4 September. 1998;159-176 Springer, Berlin.
66. Sutcliffe A.G., Carroll J.M. Designing claims for reuse in interactive systems design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 50:(3):1999;213-241.
67. Sutcliffe A.G., Ennis M. Towards a cognitive theory of information retrieval. Interacting with Computers. 10:(3):1998;321-351.
68. Sutcliffe A.G., Maiden N.A.M. Analysing the novice analyst: cognitive models in software engineering. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 36:(5):1992;719-740.
69. Sutcliffe A.G., Patel U. 3D or not 3D: Is it nobler in the mind? Sasse M.A., Cunningham R.J., Winder R.L. People and Computers XI. Proceedings: HCI-96, London August. 1996;79-94 Springer, London.
70. Sutcliffe A.G., Ryan M. Assessing the usability and efficiency of design rationale. Howard S., Hammond J., Lindgaard G. Human Computer Interaction INTERACT-97. 1997;148-155 IFIP/Chapman and Hall.
71. Timmer P., Long J. Separating user knowledge of domain and device: a framework. Thimbleby H., O'Conaill B., Thomas p. People and Computers XII: Proceedings of the HCI 97 Conference. 1997;379-396.
72. Van Der Veer G.C., VanWelie M. Task-based groupware design: Putting theory into practice. Boyarski D., Kellogg W.A. Conference Proceedings: DIS2000 Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices Methods and Techniques, New York. 2000;326-337 ACM Press, New York.
73. Van Der Veer G.C., Lenting B.F., Bergevoet B.A.J. GTA: Groupware Task Analysis: Modeling complexity. Acta Psychologica. 91:1996;297-322.
74. Van Lamsweerde A., Letier E. Handling obstacles in goal-oriented requirements engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 26:(10):2000;978-1005.
75. Vicente K.J. HCI in the global knowledge-based economy: designing to support worker adaptation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 7:(2):2000;263-280.
76. Wehrend R., Lewis C. A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques. Proceedings: First IEEE Conference on Visualization: Visualization 90. 1990;IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
77. Wharton C., Reiman J., Lewis C., Polson P. The cognitive walkthrough method: a practitioners guide. Nielsen J., Mack R.L. Usability Inspection Methods. 1994;105-140 Wiley, New York.
78. Wright P., Dearden A., Fields R. Function allocation: A perspective from studies of work practice. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 52:(2):2000;335-355.
79. Yu E.S.K. Modelling organisations for information systems requirements engineering. Fickas S., Finkelstein A.C.W. Proceedings: First International Symposium on Requirements Engineering - RE'93, San Diego, CA. 1993;34-41 IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
80. Zhou M.X., Feiner S.K. Visual task characterization for automated visual discourse synthesis. Karat C.M., Lund A., Coutaz J., Karat J. Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 98 Conference Proceedings, Los Angeles. 1998;392-399 ACM Press, New York.