Comparison of sensory panels: A ring trial

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 161-171

  McEwan, Jean A ^a  

^a CAMPDEN BRI   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Proficiency testing; Ring trial; Sensory panel

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038669004     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3293(99)00013-0     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Barylko-Pikielna, N., Zawirska-Wojtasiak, R., Kornelson, C., & Rothe, M. (1992). Interlaboratory reproducibility of sensory profiling results of margarines. Proceedings of the 3rd Wartburg Aroma Symposium.
2. BSI. (1986). Sensory analysis of foods. Part 4 - flavour profile methods BS5929. British Standards Institution.
3. Chatfield, C., & Collins, A.J. (1980). Introduction to multivariate analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
4. Dransfield E., Rhodes D.N., Nute G.R., Roberts T.A., Boccard R., Touraille C., Butcher L., Hood D.E., Joseph R.L., Schon I., Casteels M., Cosentino E., Tinbergen B.J. Eating quality of european beef assessed at five research institutes. Meat Science. 6:1982;163-184.
5. EAL. (1995). Accreditation for sensory testing laboratories: guidance on the interpretation of the EN 45000 series of standards and ISO/IEC guide 25. EAL-G26. European Cooperation for Accreditation of Laboratories.
6. ESN. (1996). A European sensory and consumer study: a case study on coffee. Published for ESN by Campden and Chorleywood Food Research Association.
7. Griffiths N.M. The use of the multiple comparison test in checking product variability. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 26:1991;429-432.
8. Heymann H. Does descriptive analysis of vanilla samples by two independently trained panels provide similar results? Chemical Senses. 17:1992;642.
9. de Kroon J., van der Laan P. Distribution free test procedures in two way layouts; a concept of rank interaction. Statistica Neerlanica. 35(4):1981;189-213.
10. Lundgren B., Jonsson B., Pangborn R.M., Sontag A., Barylko-Pikielna N., Pietrzak E., dos Santos Garruti R., Moraes M.A.C., Yoshida M. Taste discrimination vs hedonic response to sucrose in coffee beverage. An interlaboratory study. Chemical Senses. 3:1978;249-265.
11. Lundgren B., Pangborn R.M., Daget N., Yoshida M., Laing D.G., McBride R.L., Griffiths N., Hyvönen L., Sauvageot F., Paulus K., Barylko-Pikielna N. An interlaboratory study of firmness, aroma, and taste of pectin gels. Lebensmittel, Wissenschaft. und Technologie. 19:1986;66-76.
12. Lyon D.H., Watson M.P. Sensory profiling: a method for describing the sensory characteristics of virgin olive oil. Grasas y Aceites. 45:1994;20-25.
13. McEwan, J. A., Watson, M. P., & Griffiths, N. M. (1995). A comparison of sensory and consumer techniques to assess the sensory changes of products throughout storage. Vol. II: White sliced bread. R&D Report 7. CCFRA.
14. Meilgaard, M., Civille, G. V., & Carr, B. T. (1987). Sensory evaluation techniques (Vols. I and II). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
15. Mojet J., de Jong S. The sensory wheel of virgin olive oil. Grasas y Aceites. 45:1994;42-47.
16. O'Mahony, M. (1986). Sensory evaluation of food: statistical methods and procedures. New York: Marcel Dekker.
17. Risvik E., Colwill J.S., McEwan J.A., Lyon D.H. Multivariate analysis of conventional profiling data: a comparison of a British and a Norwegian trained panel. Journal of Sensory Studies. 7:1992;97-118.
18. Stone, H., & Sidel, J. L. (1985). Sensory evaluation practices. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
19. Watson, M. P., McEwan, J. A., & Griffiths, N. M. (1994). Use of sensory and consumer techniques to measure shelf-life of short shelf-life food and drink products: liquid milk. Technical memorandum no. 714. CCFRA.