|
Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 239-242
|
Shear strength of sealants placed with non-rinse conditioning compared to a conventional acid etch-rinse technique
|
Author keywords
Sealant; Shear Strength
|
Indexed keywords
BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE;
COMPOMER;
DENTIN BONDING AGENT;
DYRACT;
FISSURE SEALANT;
HELIOSEAL;
MALEIC ACID DERIVATIVE;
METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;
NON RINSE CONDITIONER;
NON-RINSE CONDITIONER;
PHOSPHORIC ACID;
POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;
PRIME & BOND;
RESIN;
SILICATE;
WATER;
ADHESION;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARTICLE;
CHEMISTRY;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DENTAL ACID ETCHING;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTAL CARE;
ENAMEL;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MECHANICAL STRESS;
METHODOLOGY;
STATISTICS;
SURFACE PROPERTY;
TIME;
ACID ETCHING, DENTAL;
ADHESIVENESS;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE;
COMPOMERS;
COMPOSITE RESINS;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTAL ENAMEL;
DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS;
DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS;
HUMANS;
MALEATES;
METHACRYLATES;
PHOSPHORIC ACIDS;
PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS;
POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS;
SILICATES;
STATISTICS;
STRESS, MECHANICAL;
SURFACE PROPERTIES;
TIME FACTORS;
WATER;
|
EID: 0038660756
PISSN: 15518949
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (12)
|
References (15)
|