Critical appraisal - Is there a need to train medical students how to read the literature?

Medical Journal of Malaysia

Volumn 57, Issue SUPPL. E, 2002, Pages 78-82

  Karina, R ^a   Nooriah, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CURRICULUM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL STUDENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; VALIDATION PROCESS; ARTICLE; MALAYSIA; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH; STANDARD; TEACHING;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; MALAYSIA; PUBLICATIONS; RESEARCH; TEACHING;

EID: 0038653466     PISSN: 03005283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: The Medline database. BMJ 1997; 315: 180-83.
2. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: Getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about). BMJ 1997; 315: 243-46.
3. Altman DG. The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ 1994; 308: 283-84.
4. Bero L, Rennie D. The Cochrane Collaboration: preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. JAMA 1995; 274: 1935-38.
5. Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH. Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1993; 270(17): 2093-95
6. Hyde C, Parkes J, Deeks J, Milne R. Systematic review of effectiveness of teaching critical appraisal. 2000 ICRF/NHS Centre for Statistics in Medicine. Project Reference 12-8. http://www.bham.ac.uk/arif/SysRevs/TeachCritAp p.PDF