|
Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1919-1923
|
Echocardiographic comparison of the standard end-hole cannula, the Soft-Flow cannula, and the dispersion cannula during perfusion into the aortic arch
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
AORTA ARCH;
ARTERIAL PRESSURE;
ARTERY CATHETERIZATION;
ARTERY PERFUSION;
ARTICLE;
CANNULA;
CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW;
DISPERSION CANNULA;
DOPPLER FLOWMETRY;
HEMATOCRIT;
HEMODYNAMICS;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MORPHOLOGY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZATION;
SOFT FLOW CANNULA;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;
ADULT;
AGED;
AORTA, THORACIC;
AORTIC DISEASES;
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS;
BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY;
CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS;
CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS;
CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS;
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
FEMALE;
HEART CATHETERIZATION;
HUMANS;
INTRACRANIAL EMBOLISM;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PERFUSION;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
RISK FACTORS;
|
EID: 0038650974
PISSN: 00034975
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00018-3 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (33)
|
References (8)
|