The utility of debriefing questions in a household survey on drug abuse

Journal of Drug Issues

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 267-284

  Fendrich, Michael ^a   Wislar, Joseph S ^a   Johnson, Timothy P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SELF EVALUATION; SOCIOECONOMICS;

EID: 0038649170     PISSN: 00220426     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002204260303300201     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2000 Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Ann Arbor Michigan: American Association for Public Opinion Research.
2. Boekeloo, B.O., Schiavo, L., Rabin, D.L., Conlon, R.T., Jordan, C.S., & Mundt, D.J. 1994 Self-reports of HIV risk factors by patients at a sexually transmitted disease clinic: Audio vs. written questionnaires. American Journal of Public Health, 84(5), 754-760.
3. Bradburn, N.M., Sudman, S., Blair, E., & Stocking, C. 1978 Question threat and response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 221-234.
4. Bryant, B.E. 1975 Respondent selection in a time of changing household composition. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 129-135.
5. Cattell, R.B. 1966 The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 140-161.
6. DesJarlais, D.C., Paone, D., Milliken, J., Turner, C.F., Miller, H., Gribble, J., Shi, Ql, Hagan, H., & Friedman, S.R. 1999 Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behavior for HIV among injecting drug users: A quasi-randomized trial. Lancet, 353, 1657-1662.
7. Dillon, W.R., & Goldstein, M. 1984 Multivariate analysis. Methods and applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8. Fendrich, M., Johnson, T.P., Sudman, S., Wislar, J.S., and Spiehler, V. 1999a Validity of drug use reporting in a high-risk community sample: A comparison of cocaine and heroin survey reports with hair tests. American Journal of Epidemiology, 149(10), 955-962.
9. Fendrich, M., Johnson, T.P., Wislar, J.S., & Sudman, S. 1999b The feasibility of hair testing in a household survey on drug abuse. In T.Mieczkowski (Ed.), Drug testing technology: Assessment of field applications (pp. 235-253). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
10. Fendrich, M., & Kim, J. 2001 Multiwave analysis of retest artifact in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth drug use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 62(3), 239-253.
11. Fendrich, M., & Miller, P. 2000 Pathways and obstacles in drug use measurement: Editors' introduction. Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 1-8.
12. Fendrich, M., & Xu, Y.C. 1994 The validity of drug use reports from juvenile arrestees. International Journal of the Addictions, 29, 971-985.
13. Groves, R.M., & Couper, M.P 1998 Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14. Groves, R.M., Dillman, D.A., Eltinge, J.L. & Little, R.J.A. 2002 Survey nonresponse. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Johnson, T.P., Fendrich, M., Sudman, S., Wislar, J., & Severns, E. 1998 An experiment to improve drug use reports during survey interviews. 1998 proceedings of the section on survey research methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
16. Lessler, J.T., Caspar, R.A., Penne, M.A., & Barker, P.R. 2000 Developing computer assisted interviewing (CAI) for the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 9-34.
17. Kaiser, H.F. 1974 An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
18. Mensch, B.S., & Kandel, D.B. 1988 Underreporting of substance use in a national longitudinal youth cohort: Individual and interviewer effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 100-124.
19. Newman, J.C., DesJarlais, D.C., Turner, C.F., Gribble, J., Cooley, P., and Paone, D. 2002 The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. American Journal of Public Health, 92(2), 294-297.
20. Office of Applied Studies 1996 National household survey on drug abuse advance report No. 18. Washington, D.C.: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
21. Romer, D., Hornik, R., Stanton, B., Black, M., Li, X., Ricardo, I., & Feigelman, S. 1997 "Talking" computers: A reliable and private method to conduct interviews on sensitive topics with children. Journal of Sex Research, 34(1), 3-9.
22. Siddiqui, O., Mott, J.A., Anderson, T.L., and Flay, B.R. 1999 Characteristics of inconsistent respondents who have "ever used" drugs in a school-based sample. Substance Use and Misuse, 34(2), 269-295.
23. SPSS Inc. 1999 SPSS for Windows: Release 10.0.5. Chicago, Il: SPSS, Inc.
24. StataCorp 1999 Stata Statistical Software: Release 6.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
25. Sudman, S., Bradburn, N.M., & Schwarz, N. 1996 Thinking about answers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Troldahl, V. & Carter, R. E. 1964 Random selection of respondents within households in phone surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 1, 71-76.
27. Turner, C.F., Ku, L., Rogers, S. M., Lindberg, L. D., Pleck, J. H., & Sonenstein, F. L. 1998 Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867-873.