Electromyographic analysis of locomotion for healthy and hemiparetic subjects - Study of performance variability and rail effect on treadmill

Gait and Posture

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-12

  Hwang, Ing Shiou ^a   Lee, Hsin Min ^a   Cherng, Rong Ju ^a   Chen, Jia Jin J ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Electromyography; Gait; Hemiparesis; Rail support; Variability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANKLE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLE; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIBIALIS ANTERIOR MUSCLE; TREADMILL; WALKING;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANKLE JOINT; BIOMECHANICS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; GAIT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PARESIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; WALKING;

EID: 0038647079     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00071-1     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Boccardi S., Frigo C., Tesio L. A biomechanical study of locomotion by hemiplegic patients. Morecki L.A., Fidelus K. Biomechanics. VII-A:1981;Baltimore, University Park Press.
2. Giuliani C.A. Adult hemiplegic gait. Smidt G.L. Gait in rehabilitation. 1990;253-266 Churchill Livingstone, New York.
3. Wagenaar R.C., Beek W.J. Hemiparetic gait: a kinematic analysis using walking speed as a basis. J. Biomech. 25:1992;1007-1015.
4. Murray M.P., Spurr G.B., Sepic S.B., Gardner G.M., Mollinger L.A. Treadmill vs. floor walking: kinematics, electromyogram, and heart rate. J. Appl. Physiol. 59:1985;87-91.
5. Strathy G.M., Chao E.Y., Laugman R.K. Changes in knee function associated with treadmill ambulation. J. Biomech. 16:1983;517-522.
6. White S.C., Yack H.J., Tucker C.A., Lin H.Y. Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill walking. Med. Sci. Sport Exer. 30:1998;1537-1542.
7. Alton F., Baldey S., Caplan S., Morrissey M.C. A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. Clin. Biomech. 13:1998;434-440.
8. Pailhous J., Bonnard M. Steady-state fluctuations of human walking. Behav. Brain Res. 47:1992;181-189.
9. Stolze H., Kuhtz-Buschbeck J.P., Mondwurf C., Boczek-Funcke A., Johnk K., Deuschl G., et al. Gait analysis during treadmill and overground locomotion in children and adults. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 105:1997;490-497.
10. Matsas A., Taylor N., McBurney H. Knee joint kinematics from familarised treadmill walking can be generalized to overground walking in young unimpaired subjects. Gait Posture. 11:2000;46-53.
11. Wall J.C., Charteries J. A kinematic study of long-term habituation to treadmill walking. Ergonomics. 24:1981;531-542.
12. Arsenault A.B. Treadmill versus walkway locomotion in humans: an EMG study. Ergonomics. 29:1986;665-676.
13. Kadaba M.P., Wootten M.E., Gainey J., Cochran G.V. Repeatability of phasic muscle activity: performance of surface and intramuscular wire electrodes in gait analysis. J. Orthop. Res. 3:1985;350-359.
14. Gabel R.H., Brand R.A. The effects of signal conditioning on the statistical analyses of gait EMG. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 93:1994;188-201.
15. Siler W.L., Jorgensen A.L., Norris R.A. Grasping the handrails during treadmill walking does not alter sagittal plane kinematics of walking. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78:1997;393-398.
16. Chen J.J., Shiavi R.G., Zhang L.Q. A quantitative and qualitative description of electromyographic linear envelopes for synergy analysis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39:1992;9-18.
17. Chen J.J., Shiavi R.G. Temporal feature extraction and clustering analysis of electromyographic linear envelopes in gait studies. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37:1990;295-302.
18. Zhang L.Q., Shiavi R.G., Hunt M.A., Chen J.J. Clustering analysis and pattern discrimination of EMG linear envelopes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 38:1991;777-784.
19. Yang J.F., Winter D.A. Electromyographic amplitude normalization methods: improving their sensitivity as diagnostic tools in gait analysis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 65:1984;517-521.
20. Erni T., Colombo G. Locomotor training in paraplegic patients: a new approach to assess changes in leg muscle EMG patterns. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 109:(2):1998;135-139.
21. Shiavi R. Electromyographic patterns in normal adult locomotion. Smide G.L. Gait in rehabilitation. 1990;97-120 Churchill Livingstone, New York.
22. Perry J., Waters R., Perrin T. Electromyographic analysis of equinovarus following stroke. Clin. Orthop. 131:1978;47-53.
23. Layne C.S., McDonald P.V., Bloomberg J.J. Neuromuscular activation patterns during treadmill walking after space. Exp. Brain Res. 113:1997;104-116.
24. Dingwell J.B., Cusumano J.P., Cavanagh P.R., Sternad D. Local dynamics stability versus kinematics variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking. J. Biomech. Eng. 123:2001;27-32.
25. Perry J. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. 1st ed. 1992;Slack Inc, Thorofare.
26. Dingwell J.B., Ulbrecht J.S., Boch J., Becker M.B., O'Gorman J.T., Cavanagh P.R. Neuropathic gait shows only trends towards increased variability of sagittal plane kinematics during treadmill locomotion. Gait Posture. 10:1999;21-29.
27. Roy E.A., Square P.A., Hogg S., Adam S. Analysis of task demands in apraxia. Int. J. Neurosci. 56:1991;177-186.
28. Knutsson E., Martensson A. Isokinetic measurements of muscle strength in hysterical paresis. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 61:1985;370-374.
29. Carlsöö P., Dahllöf A., Holm J. Kinetic analysis of gait in patients with hemiparesis and in patients with intermittent claudication. Scan. J. Rehabil. Med. 6:1974;166-179.
30. Emeryk-szajewska B., Kopeé J., Karwanska A. The reorganization of motor units in motor neuron disease. Muscle Nerve. 20:1997;306-315.
31. Mathieu P.A. Changes in the hemiparetic limb with training. II. EMG signal. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 35:1995;503-513.
32. Newell K.M., Corcos D.M. Issues in variability and motor control. Newell K.M., Corcos D.M. Variability of motor control. 1993;1-12 Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
33. Schmidt R.A. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. 2nd ed:1988;267-298 Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
34. Dingwell J.B., Cavanagh P.R. Increased variability of continuous overground walking in neuropatients in only indirectly related to sensory loss. Gait Posture. 14:2001;1-10.
35. Visintin M., Barbeau H. The effects of parallel bars, body weight support and speed on the modulation of the locomotor pattern of spastic paretic gait. A preliminary communication. Paraplegia. 32:1994;540-553.
36. Saunders J.B., deC M., Inman V.T., Eberthart H.D. The major determinants in normal and pathological gait. J. Bone Joint Surg. 35-A:1953;543-580.
37. Riccio G.E., Stoffregen T.A. Affordances as constraints on the control of stance. Hum. Mov. Sci. 7:1988;265-300.
38. Olney S.J., Jackson V.G., George S.R. Gait reeducation guidelines for stroke hemiparetic for using mechanical energy and power analysis. Physiother. Can. 40:1987;242-248.
39. Hausdorff J.M., Rios D.A., Edelberg H.K. Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: a prospective study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 82:2001;1050-1056.
40. Dietz V., Gollhofer A., Kleiber M., Trippel M. Regulation of bipedal stance: dependency on 'load' receptors. Exp. Brain Res. 89:1992;229-231.
41. Dietz V. Evidence for a load receptor contribution to the control of posture and locomotion. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 22:1998;495-499.
42. Finch L., Barbeau H., Arsenault B. Influence of body weight support on normal human gait: development of a gait retraining strategy. Phys. Ther. 71:1991;842-855.
43. Dietz V., Colombo G. Influence of body load on the gait pattern in Parkinson's disease. Mov. Disord. 13:1998;255-261.
44. Hesse S., Konrad M., Uhlenbrock D. Treadmill walking with partial body weight support versus floor walking in hemiparetic subjects. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80:1999;421-427. [blank_line]