Calibrating phylogenetic species formation in a threatened insect using DNA from historical specimens

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1993-1998

  Goldstein, Paul Z ^a   Desalle, Rob ^b  

^a FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^b DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ancient DNA; Cicindela dorsalis; Conservation genetics; mtDNA; Phylogenetic species; Population aggregation analysis

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BEETLES; DNA PRIMERS; MID-ATLANTIC REGION; NEW ENGLAND; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

CARABIDAE; CICINDELA DORSALIS; CICINDELIDAE; COLEOPTERA; INSECTA; PANTHERA TIGRIS;

EID: 0038645396     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01860.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Avise JC (1989) A role for molecular genetics in the recognition and conservation of endangered species. Trends in Ecological Evology, 4, 279-281.
2. Ballard JWO, Chernoff B, James AC (2002) Divergence of mitochondrial DNA is not corroborated by nuclear DNA, morphology or behavior in Drosophila simulans. Evolution, 56, 527-545.
3. Cracraft J (1983) Species concepts and speciation analysis. In: Current Ornithology, Vol. 1, pp. 159-187. Plenum Press, New York.
4. Davis JI, Nixon KC (1992) Populations, genetic variation, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Systomtic Biology, 41, 421-435.
5. De Queiroz K (1998) The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: a conceptual unification and terminological recommendations. In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (eds Howard, DJ Berlocher SH), pp. 57-78. Oxford University Press, New York.
6. Dean C (1999) Against the Tide. Columbia University Press, New York.
7. DeSalle R, Williams A, George M (1993) Isolation and manipulation of animal mitochondrial DNA. Methods in Enzymology, 224, 176-204.
8. Frost DR, Kluge AG (1994) A consideration of epistemology in systematic biology, with special reference to species. Cladistics, 10, 259-294.
9. Goldstein PZ, Brower AVZ (2002) Molecular systematics and the origin of species: new syntheses or methodological introgressions? In: Molecular Systematics and Evolution: Theory and Practice (eds DeSalle R, Giribet G, Wheeler W), pp. 147-161. Birkhauser Verlag, Switzerland.
10. Goldstein PZ, DeSalle R (2000) Phylogenetic species, nested hierarchies, and character fixation. Cladistics, 16, 364-384.
11. Goldstein PZ, DeSalle R, Amato G, Vogler A (2000) Conservation genetics at the species boundary. Conservation Biology, 14, 120-131.
12. Harrison RG (1998) Linking evolutionary pattern and process - the relevance of species concepts for the study of speciation. In: Endless Forms, Species and Speciation (eds Howard DJ, Berlocher SH), pp. 19-31. Oxford University Press, New York.
13. Knisley CB, Luebke JI, Beatty DR (1987) Natural history and population decline of the coastal tiger beetle Cicindela dorsalis dorsalis Say (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Virginia Journal of Science, 38, 293-303.
14. Luckow M (1995) Species concepts: assumptions, methods, and applications. Systematic Botany, 20, 589-605.
15. Lundberg JG, Chernoff B (1992) A miocene fossil of the Amazonian fish Araipema (Teleostei: Arapaimidae) from the Magdalena River region of Colombia - biogeographic and evolutionary implications. Biotropica, 24, 2-14.
16. Moritz C (1994) Applications of mitochondrial DNA analysis in conservation: a critical review. Molecular Ecology, 3, 401-411.
17. Nixon KC, Wheeler QC (1991) An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics, 6, 211-223.
18. Nothnagle P, Simmons T (1990) Ecology of the Northeastern beach tiger beetle Cicindela d. dorsalis in southeastern Massachusetts. Unpublished report to Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (MNHESP).
19. Phillips AJ, Simon C (1995) Simple, efficient, and nondestructive DNA extraction protocol for arthropods. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 88, 281-283.
20. Templeton AR (2001) Using phylogeographic analyses of gene trees to test species status and processes. Molecular Ecology, 10, 779-791.
21. US Fish and Wildlife Service (1994) Northeastern Beach Tiger Beetle Cicindela d. dorsalis (Say) Recovery Plan. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, MA.
22. Vogler AP (1994) Extinction and the formation of phylogenetic lineages: diagnosing units of conservation management in the tiger beetle Cicindela dorsalis. In: Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications (eds Schierwater B, Streit B, Wagner GP, DeSalle R), pp. 261-274. Birkhauser-Verlag, Basel.
23. Vogler AP, DeSalle R (1993a) Phylogeographic patterns in coastal North American tiger beetles (Cicindela dorsalis Say) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution, 47, 1192-1202.
24. Vogler AP, DeSalle R (1993b) Mitochondrial DNA evolution and the application of the phylogenetics species concept in the Cicindela dorsalis complex (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). In: Carabid Beetles: Ecology and Evolution (ed. Desender K), pp. 69-75. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.
25. Vogler AP, DeSalle R, Assmann T, Knisley CB, Schultz TD (1993b) Molecular population genetics of the endangered tiger beetle Cicindela dorsalis (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 86, 142-152.
26. Vogler AP, DeSalle R (1994) Diagnosing units of conservation management. Conservation Biology, 8, 354-363.
27. Vogler AP, Glueck CB, Hill JM, DeSalle R (1993a) Using molecular and ecological data to diagnose endangered populations of the Puritan tiger beetle Cicindela puritana. Molecular Ecology, 2, 375-383.
28. Walsh PD (2000) Sample size for the diagnosis of conservation units. Conservation Biology, 14, 1533-1537.
29. Wheeler QD, Meier R (2000) Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: a Debate. Columbia University Press, New York.