Kin selection may inhibit the evolution of reciprocation

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 222, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 331-335

  Marshall, James A R ^a   Rowe, Jonathan E ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evolution of cooperation; Kin selection; Reciprocal cooperation

Indexed keywords

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EVOLUTION; KIN SELECTION; RECIPROCITY;

ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATION; EVOLUTION; GENE FREQUENCY; KIN SELECTION; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

EID: 0038640257     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00039-0     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Axelrod R. The Evolution of Cooperation. 1984;Basic Books, New York.
2. Axelrod R. The evolution of strategies in the iterated prisoner's dilemma. Davis L. Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing. 1987;32-41 Pitman, London.
3. Axelrod R., Hamilton W.D. The evolution of cooperation. Science. 211:1981;1390-1396.
4. Clutton-Brock T.H. Breeding together. kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates Science. 296:2002;69-72.
5. Engels W. Evolution of altruistic behaviour by kin selection. an alternative approach Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 80:1983;515-518.
6. Fogel D.B. Evolving behaviours in the iterated prisoner's dilemma. Evol. Comp. 1(1):1993;77-97.
7. Hamilton W.D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I. J. theor. Biol. 7:1964;1-16.
8. Hamilton W.D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour II. J. theor. Biol. 7:1964;17-52.
9. Heinsohn R., Packer C. Complex cooperative strategies in group-territorial African lions. Science. 269:1995;1260-1262.
10. Mar G., St. Denis P. Chaos in cooperation. continuous-valued prisoner's dilemmas in infinite valued logic Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos. 4(4):1994;943-958.
11. Marshall J.A.R., Rowe J.E. Investigating the mechanisms underlying cooperation in viscous population multi-agent systems. Bedau M.A., McCaskill J.S., Packard N.H., Rasmussen S. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Artificial Life. 2000;348-352 MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
12. Nowak M., Sigmund K. A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the prisoner's dilemma game. Nature. 364:1993;56-58.
13. Pepper J.W., Smuts B.B. The evolution of cooperation in an ecological context. an agent-based model Kohler T.A., Gumerman G.J. Dynamics of Human and Primate Societies: Agent based Modelling of Social and Spatial Processes. 1999;45-76 Oxford University Press, New York.
14. Spears W.M., DeJong K.A. On the virtues of parameterized uniform crossover. Belew R.K., Booker L.B. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. 1991;230-236 Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
15. Trivers R. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46:1971;35-57.
16. Wilson D.S., Pollock G.B., Dugatkin L.A. Can altruism evolve in purely viscous populations? Evol. Ecol. 6:1992;331-341.
17. Wu J., Axelrod R. How to cope with noise in the iterated prisoner's dilemma. J. Conf. Reso. 39(1):1995;183-189.