Administration versus management: A reading from beyond the boundaries

Administration and Society

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 210-230

  Stivers, Camilla ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Administration; Gender; Management; Public

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038632354     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095399703035002005     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Allison, G. (1997). Public and private management: Are they alike in all unimportant respects? In J. Shafritz & A. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration (4th ed., pp. 383-400). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
2. Behn, R. D. (1991). Leadership counts: Lessons for public managers from the Massachusetts Welfare, Training, and Employment Program. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Behn, R. D. (1998). What right do public managers have to lead? Public Administration Review, 58, 209-230.
4. Cook, B. J. (1998). Politics, political leadership, and public management. Public Administration Review, 58, 225-230.
5. Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967)
6. Dilulio, J. J., Jr. (1990). Leadership and social science. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 9, 116-126.
7. Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper and Bros.
8. Fondas, N. (1997). Feminisation unveiled: Management qualities in contemporary writings. Academy of Management Review, 22, 257-282.
9. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Viking. (Original work published 1975)
10. Gilbreth, L. M. (1914). The psychology of management: The function of the mind in determining, teaching and installing methods of least waste. New York: Sturgis and Wallon.
11. Hearn, J. (1992). Men in the public eye: Critical studies on men and masculinities. London: Routledge.
12. Hood, C. (1998). The art of the state: Culture, rhetoric, and public management. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
13. Jacques, R. (1996). Manufacturing the employee: Management knowledge from the 19th to the 21st centuries. London: Sage.
14. Johnson, B. (1987). A world of difference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Keller, L., & Spicer, M. (1997). Political science and public administration: A necessary cleft? Public Administration Review, 57, 270-271.
16. Levine, C. H. (1986). The federal government in the year 2000: Administrative legacies of the Reagan years. Public Administration Review, 46, 195-206.
17. Lynn, L. E., Jr. (1994). Public management research: The triumph of art over science. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13, 231-259.
18. Lynn, L. E., Jr. (1996). Public management as art, science, and profession. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
19. Lynn, L. E., Jr. (2001). The myth of the bureaucratic paradigm: What traditional public administration really stood for. Public Administration Review, 61, 144-160.
20. Mainzer, L. C. (1994). Public administration in search of a theory: The interdisciplinary delusion. Administration & Society, 26, 359-394.
21. McSwite, O. C. (1997). Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Messerschmidt, J. W. (1995). Managing to kill: Masculinities and the space shuttle Challenger explosion. Masculinities, 3(4), 1-22.
23. Morgan, D., Bacon, K. G., Bunch, R., Cameron, C. D., & Deis, R. (1996). What middle managers do in local government: Stewardship of the public trust and the limits of reinventing government. Public Administration Review, 56, 359-365.
24. Mosher, F. C. (1982). Democracy and the public service (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Mumby, D. K., & Stohl, C. (1991). Power and discourse in organization studies: Absence and the dialectic of control. Discourse and Society, 2, 313-332.
26. Murphy, C. D. (1917). Living up to your employment system. In A. W. Shaw Company (Ed.), Handling men (pp. 16-21). Chicago: A. W. Shaw Co.
27. Nelson, J. A. (1996). Feminism, objectivity and economics. London: Routledge.
28. Noble, D. F. (1977). America by design: Science, technology and the rise of corporate capitalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29. O'Toole, L. J. (1997). Treating networks seriously. Practical and research-based agendas for public administration. Public Administration Review, 57, 45-52.
30. Person, H. S. (1926a). Basic principles of administration and management: Major problems of management. In H. C. Metcalf (Ed.), Scientific foundations of business administration (pp. 234-254). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
31. Person, H. S. (1926b). Basic principles of administration and management: The management movement. In H. C. Metcalf (Ed.), Scientific foundations of business administration (pp. 191-203). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
32. Person, H. S. (1926c). Basic principles of administration and management: Scientific management. In H. C. Metcalf (Ed.), Scientific foundations of business administration (pp. 204-207). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
33. Peters, B. G. (1988). Comparing public bureaucracies: Problems of theory and method. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
34. Rodgers, R., & Rodgers, N. (2000). Defining the boundaries of public administration: Undisciplined mongrels versus disciplined purists. Public Administration Review, 60, 435-445.
35. Rorty, R. (1998). Feminism and pragmatism. In Truth and progress: Philosophical papers (Vol. 3, pp. 202-227). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Sayre, W. (1958). The unhappy bureaucrats: Views ironic, hopeful, indignant. Public Administration Review, 18, 239-245.
37. Sheldon, O. (1923). The philosophy of management. London: Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons.
38. Stivers, C. (1996). Refusing to get it right: Citizenship, difference, and the refounding project. In G. Wamsley & J. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding democratic public administration (pp. 260-278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Stivers, C. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the Progressive Era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
40. Stivers, C. (2002). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Strom, S. H. (1992). Beyond the typewriter: Gender, class, and the origins of modern American office work. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42. Violi, P. (1992). Gender, subjectivity and language. In G. Bock & S. James (Eds.), Beyond equality and difference: Citizenship, feminist politics, and female subjectivity (pp. 164-176). London: Routledge.
43. Waldo, D. (1968). Scope of the theory of public administration. In J. C. Charlesworth (Ed.), Theory and practice of public administration (pp. 1-26). Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science.
44. Whicker, M. L., Strickland, R. A., & Olshfski, D. (1993). The troublesome cleft: Public administration and political science. Public Administration Review, 53, 531-541.
45. Willard, H. L. (1917). The knack of holding your men. In A. W. Shaw Company (Ed.), Handling men (pp. 58-63). Chicago: A. W. Shaw Co.