Stereoscopic segmentation

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 31-43

  Yezzi, Anthony ^a   Soatto, Stefano ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

Image segmentation; Level set methods; Multi frame stereo reconstruction; Mumford Shah functional; Variational methods

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; OBJECT RECOGNITION; OPTIMIZATION; PHOTOMETRY; PIECEWISE LINEAR TECHNIQUES; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE; VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES;

LEVEL SET METHODS; MUMFORD-SHAH FUNCTIONAL; STEREO RECONSTRUCTION; STEREOSCOPIC SEGMENTATION;

STEREO VISION;

EID: 0038623047     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023079624234     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Blake, A. and Yuille, A. 1992, Active Vision. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
2. Caselles, V., Catte, F., Coll, T., and Dibos, F. 1993, A geometric model for active contours in image processing. Numerische Mathematik, 66:1-31.
3. Caselles, V., Kimmel, R., and Sapiro, G. 1997. Geodesic snakes. Int. J. Computer Vision, 22(1):61-79.
4. Chakraborty, A. and Duncan, J. 1999. Game-theoretic integration for image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 21(1):12-30.
5. Chakraborty, A., Staib, L., and Duncan, J. 1996. Deformable boundary finding in medical images by integrating gradient and region information. IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, 15(6):859-870.
6. Chan, T. and Vese, L. 1999. An active contours model without edges. Int. Conf. Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision, pp. 141-151.
7. Cipolla, R. and Blake, A. 1992. Surface shape from the deformation of apparent contours. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 9(2).
8. Cohen, L. 1991. On active contour models and balloons, CVGIP: Image Understanding, 53:211-218.
9. Crandall, M., Ishii, H., and Lions, P. 1992. Users guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations, Bulletin of Amer. Math. Soc., 27:1-67.
10. Faugeras, O. 1993. Three Dimensional Vision, a Geometric Viewpoint. MIT Press.
11. Faugeras, O. and Keriven, R. 1996. Variational principles, surface evolution pdes, level set methods and the stereo problem. INRIA Technical Report, 3021:1-37.
12. Fleming, W. and Soner, H. 1993. Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions. Springer-Verlag: New York.
13. Horn, B. and Brooks, M. (eds.), 1989. Shape from Shading. MIT Press.
14. Jin, H., Yezzi, A., Tsai, R., Cheng, L., and Soattoo, S. 2003. Estimation of 3D surface shape and smooth radiance from 2D images: A level set approach. J. of Comp. Physics (in press).
15. Kass, M., Witkin, A., and Terzopoulos, D. 1987. Snakes: Active contour models, Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 1:321-331.
16. Kichenassamy, S., Kumar, A., Olver, P., Tannenbaum, A., and Yezzi, A. 1996. Conformal curvature flows: From phase transitions to active vision. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 134:275-301.
17. Kutulakos, K. and Seitz, S. 1998. A theory of shape by space carving. In Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Comp. Vision.
18. Laurentini, A. 1994. The visual hull concept for silhouette-based image understanding. PAMI (16)2:150-162.
19. Leclerc, Y. 1989. Constructing stable descriptions for image partitioning, Int. J. Computer Vision, 3:73-102.
20. LeVeque, R.J. 1992. Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Birkhäuser: Boston.
21. Lions, P.L. 1982. Generalized Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi Equations. Pitman Publishing: Boston.
22. Malladi, R., Sethian, J., and Vemuri, B. 1995. Shape modeling with front propagation: A level set approach, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 17:158-175.
23. Mumford, D. and Shah, J. 1989. Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Comm. on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 42:577-685.
24. Mumford, D. and Shah, J. 1985. Boundary detection by minimizing functionals. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Francisco.
25. Osher, S. 1984. Riemann solvers, the entropy condition, and difference approximations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 21:217-235.
26. Osher, S. and Sethian, J. 1988. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi equations. J. of Comp. Physics, 79:12-49.
27. Paragios, N. and Deriche, R. 1999. Geodesic active regions for supervised texture segmentation. In Proceedings of ICCV, Corfu, Greece.
28. Paragios, N. and Deriche, R. 2000. Coupled geodesic active regions for image segmentation: A level set approach, In Proceedings of ECCV, Dublin, Ireland.
29. Ronfard, R. 1994. Region-based strategies for active contour models, Int. J. Computer Vision, 13(2):229-251.
30. Rosenholtz, R. and Malik, J. 1993. A differential method for computing local shape-from-texture for planar and curved surfaces. UCB-CSD 93-775, Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley.
31. Samson, C., Blanc-Feraud, L., Aubert, G., and Zerubia, J. 1999. A level set method for image classification, In Int. Conf. Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision, pp. 306-317.
32. Sethian, J. 1996. Level Set Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Material Science, Cambridge University Press.
33. Siddiqi, K., Lauziere, Y., Tannenbaum, A., and Zucker, S. 1998. Area and length minimizing flows for segmentation, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 7:433-444.
34. Szeliski, R. and Scharstein, D. 2002. Symmetric subpixel stereo matching. In Proc. of the Seventh European Conference on Computer Vision, Copenhagen, Denmark.
35. Tek, H. and Kimia, B. 1995. Image segmentation by reaction diffusion bubbles, In Proc. Int. Conf. Computer Vision, pp. 156-162.
36. Tsai, R., Burchard, P., Cheng, L., Osher, S., and Sapiro, G. 2002. Dynamic visibility in a level set based implicit frame work, CAM Technical Report 02-06.
37. Terzopoulos, D. and Witkin, A. 1988. Constraints on deformable models: Recovering shape and non-rigid motion. Artificial Intelligence, 36:91-123.
38. Yezzi, A., Tsai, A., and Willsky, A. 1999. A statistical approach to image segmentation for bimodal and trimodal imagery. In Proceedings of ICCV.
39. Zhu, S., Lee, T., and Yuille, A. 1995. Region competition: Unifying snakes, region growing, and bayes/MDL for multiband image segmentation. In Proc. of ICCV pp 416-423.
40. Zhu, S. and Yuille, A. 1996. Region competition: Unifying snakes, region growing, and bayes/MDL for multiband image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(9):884-900.