The assessment of an intra-oral video camera as an aid to occlusal caries detection

International Dental Journal

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 3-6

  Forgie, A H ^a   Pine, C M ^b   Pitts, N B ^b  

^a DUNDEE DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Caries detection; Caries lesions; Intra oral video camera; Video

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIN; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENAMEL; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SCORING SYSTEM; TELEVISION CAMERA; TISSUE SECTION; VALIDATION PROCESS; VIDEORECORDING; VISION; CANINE TOOTH; CLASSIFICATION; INSTRUMENTATION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BICUSPID; CUSPID; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0038621816     PISSN: 00206539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2003.tb00648.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Sawle RF, Andlaw RJ. Has occlusal caries become more difficult to diagnose? Br Dent J 1988 164: 209-211.
2. Wenzel A, Pitts N, Verdonschot EH et al. Developments in radiographic caries diagnosis. J Dent 1993 21: 131-140.
3. Clerehugh V, Blinkhorn AS, Downer MC et al Changes in caries prevalence of 11-12 year old school children in the north west of England 1968-1981. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1983 11: 367-370.
4. Milicich G. Clinical applications of new advances in occlusal caries diagnosis. N Z Dent J 2000 96: 23-26.
5. Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts N, et al. Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 1999 33: 261-266.
6. Huysmans MC, Longbottom C, Pitts N. Electrical methods in occlusal caries diagnosis: An in vitro comparison with visual inspection and bitewing radiography Caries Res 1998 32: 324-329.
7. Wenzel A, Larsen MJ, Fejerskov O. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs Caries Res 1991 25: 365-371.
8. Moystad A, Svanæs DB, Larheim TA et al. Effect of image magnification of digitized bitewing radiographs on approximal caries detection: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 1995 24: 255-259.
9. Russell M, Pitts NB. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: Initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography. Caries Research 1993 27: 65-70.
10. Whitehead SA, Wilson NHF Restorative decision-making behaviour with magnification. Quintessence Int 1992 23(10): 667-671.
11. Forgie AH, Pine CM, Pitts NB. The use of magnification in a preventive approach to caries detection. Quintessence Int 2002 33: 13-16.
12. Friedman J, Marcus MI. Transillumination of the oral cavity with the use of fibre optics. J Am Dent Assoc 1970 80: 801-809.
13. Mitropoulos CM. A comparison of fibre-optic transillumination with bitewing radiographs. Br Dent J 1985 159: 21-23.
14. Ricketts DNJ, Kidd EAM, Liepins PJ et al. Histological validation of electrical resistance measurements in the diagnosis of occlusal caries. Caries Res 1996 30: 148-155.
15. Ashley PF, Ellwood RP, Worthington HV et al. Predicting occlusal caries using the Electronic Caries Monitor. Caries Res 2000 34: 201-203.
16. Lussi A, Pitts N, Hotz P et al. Reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries. Caries Res 1998 32: 297.
17. Lussi, A, Megert B, Longbottom C et al. Clinical performance of a laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2001 109: 14-19.
18. Kairralla EC, Lage Marques JL, Rode SM et al. A valiation (sic) the diagnosis methods of carious lesion. J Dent Res 1998 77: 1156, abstract 110.
19. Longbottom C, Pitts NB. An initial comparison between endoscopic and conventional methods of caries diagnosis. Quintessence Int 1990 21: 531-540.
20. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press: New York; 1983.
21. Ekstrand KR, Qvist V and Thylstrup A. Light microscope study of the effect of probing in occlusal surfaces. Caries Res 1987 21: 368-374.
22. Downer M. Validation methods used in dental caries diagnosis. Int Dent J 1989 39: 241-246.
23. Fyffe HE, Deery C, Nugent ZJ et al. In vitro validity of the Dundee Selectable Threshold Method for caries diagnosis (DSTM). Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000 28: 52-58.
24. Smith GL, Adams SK. Magnification and microminiature inspection. Human Factors 1971 13: 247-254.
25. Soh G, Chong YH. Determination of an optimal magnification for examining voids in elastomeric impressions. Int J Prosthodont 1990 3: 573-576.