Web hypermedia cost estimation: Further assessment and comparison off cost estimation modelling techniques

New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 199-229

  Mendes, Emilia ^a   Counsell, Steve ^b   Mosley, Nile ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c MxM Technology   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA STRUCTURES; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

COST ESTIMATION MODELLING TECHNIQUES; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION; STEPWISE REGRESSION TECHNIQUE; WEB HYPERMEDIA COST ESTIMATION;

HYPERMEDIA SYSTEMS;

EID: 0038617730     PISSN: 13614568     EISSN: 17407842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13614560208914741     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. R.S., Pressman, What a tangled web we weave, IEEE Software, Jan, 2000, pp. 18–21
2. D.J., Reifer, estimating quick-to-market software, IEEE Software, Nov, 2000, pp. 57–64
3. E., Mendes and I., Watson and C., Triggs and N., Mosley and S., Counsell, A comparison of development effort estimation techniques for web hypermedia applications, Proceedings of the IEEE Metrics Symposium, 2002, pp. 131–140
4. E., Mendes and S., Counsell and N., Mosley, Measurement and effort prediction of web applications, Proc. Second ICSE Workshop on Web Engineering, Limerick, Jun, 2000
5. C., Kirsopp and M., Shepperd, Making inferences with small numbers of training sets, Bournemouth university Jan, 2001, TR02-01
6. E., Mendes and N., Mosley and I., Watson, A comparison of case–based reasoning approaches to web hypermedia project cost estimation, Proceedings of the WWW'2002 Conference, 2002
7. E., Mendes and N., Mosley and S., Counsell, Web metrics–estimating design and authoring effort, IEEE Multimedia, Special Issue on Web Engineering, Jan, 2001, pp. 50–57
8. E., Mendes and N., Mosley and S.A., Counsell, A comparison of length, complexity & functionality as size measures for predicting web design & authoring effort, Proceedings of the 2001 EASE Conference, Keele, 2001, pp. 1–14
9. A.J.C., Cowderoy, Measures of size and complexity for web–site content, Proceedings of the Combined IIth European Software Control and Metrics Conference and the 3rd SCOPE conference on Software Product Quality, Munich, 2000, pp. 423–431
10. A.J.C., Cowderoy and A.J.M., Donaldson and J.O., Jenkins, A metrics framework for multimedia creation, Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium, Maryland, 1998, pp. 144–147
11. L.C., Briand and K., El–Emam and D., Surmann and I., Wieczorex and K.D., Maxwell, An assessment and comparison of common cost estimation modeling techniques, Proceedings of ICSE 1999, Los angeles, 1999, pp. 313–322
12. JJ., Dolado, On the problem of the software cost function, Information and Software Technology, 2001, 43, pp. 61–72
13. S.P., Christodoulou and P.A., Zafiris and T.S., Papatheodorou, WWW2000:The Developer's view and a practitioner's approach to Web Engineering, Proceedings Second ICSE Workshop on Web Engineering, Limerick, Jun, 2000, pp. 75–92
14. F., Garzotto and P., Paolini and D., Schwabe, HDM–A model–based approach to hypertext application design, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Jan, 1993, 11 1
15. D., Schwabe and G., Rossi, From domain models to hypermedia applications:an object–oriented approach, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Methodologies for Designing and Developing Hypermedia Applications, Edinburgh, Sep, 1994
16. V., Balasubramanian and T., Isakowitz and E.A., Stohr, A methodology for structured hypermedia design, Communications of the ACM, Aug, 1995, 38 8
17. F., Coda and C., Ghezzi and G., Vigna and F., Garzotto, Towards a software engineering approach to web site development, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, 1998, pp. 8–17
18. R.J., Spiro and P.J., Feltovich and M.J., Jacobson and R.L., Coulson, Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext:random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill–structured domains, Constructivism, Eribaum, 1995, In:L. Steffe & J. Gale, eds
19. G., Kadoda and M., Cartwright and M.J., Shepperd, Issues on the effective use of CBR technology for software project prediction, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Case–Based Reasoning, Vancouver, Jul, 2001, ICCBR 2001, pp. 276–290
20. L., Schroeder and D., Sjoquist and P., Stephan, Understanding regression analysis:an introductory guide, Newbury park, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Sage Publications, 1986
21. M.J., SHEPPERD and C., SCHOFIELD and B., KITCHENHAM, Effort estimation using analogy, Proceedings ICSE-18, IEEE, 1996, pp. 170–178
22. M.J., SHEPPERD and G., KADODA, Using simulation to evaluate prediction techniques, Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Software Metrics Symposium, London, 2001, pp. 349–358
23. P., KOK and B.A., KITCHENHAM and J., KIRAKOWSKI, The MERMAID approach to software cost estimation ESPRIT Annual Conference, Brussels, 1990, pp. 296–314
24. I., WATSON, Applying Case-Based Reasoning:techniques for enterprise systems, San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann, 1997
25. S., OKAMOTO and K., SATOH, An average–case analysis of k–nearest neighbour classifier, Case–Based Reasoning Research and Development, 1995, In:M. Veloso & A. Aamodt, eds
26. C.F., Kemerer, An empirical validation of software cost estimation models, Communications of the ACM, 1986, 30 5, pp. 416–429
27. I., Myrtveit and E.A., Stensrud, A controlled experiment to assess the benefits of estimating with analogy and regression models, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1999, 25 4, pp. 510–525
28. B.A., KITCHENHAM and L.M., PICKARD and S.G., MACDONELL and M.J., SHEPPERD, What accuracy statistics really measure, IEE Proceedings - Software Engineering, Jun, 2001, pp. 81–85
29. S., CONTE and H., DUNSMORE and V., SHEN, Software Engineering Metrics and Models, Menlo Park, Benjamin/Cummings, 1986
30. S., SCHULZ, CBR–Works–a state–of–the–art shell for case-based application building, Proceedings of the German Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, 1999, GWCBR“99
31. L., ANGELIS and I.A., STAMELOS, A simulation tool for efficient analogy based cost estimation, Empirical Software Engineering, 2000, 5, pp. 35–68
32. G., KADODA and M., CARTWRIGHT and L., CHEN and M.J., SHEPPERD, Experiences using case–based reasoning to predict software project effort Proceedings of the EASE 2000 Conference, Keele, 2000
33. F., WALKJERDEN and R., JEFFERY, An empirical study of analogy–based software effon estimation, Empirical Software Engineering, Jun, 1999, 4 2, pp. 135–158
34. L., PICKARD and B., KITCHENHAM and S., LINKMAN, An Investigation of Analysis Techniques for Software Datasets, roceedings Sixth IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium, 1999, pp. 130–142
35. R., JEFFERY and M., RUHE and I., WIECZOREK, Using Public Domain Metrics to Estimate Software Development Effort, Proceedings IEEE 7th Metrics Symposium, London, 2001, pp. 16–27