Capturing communication and context in the software project lifecycle

Research in Engineering Design

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 75-88

  Zaychik, Vera ^a,b   Regli, William C ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOCKHEED MARTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative design; Computer supported cooperative work; Software design; Software maintenance; Software project management

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC MAIL; LIFE CYCLE; USER INTERFACES;

COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; SOFTWARE DESIGN; SOFTWARE PACKAGE CODELINK; SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0038610564     PISSN: 09349839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00163-002-0027-8     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bandinelli S, Fuggetta A, Ghezzi C, Lavazza L (1994) SPADE: an environment for software process analysis, design, and enactment. In: Finkelstein A, Kramer J, Nuseibeh B (eds) Software process modeling and technology. Research Studies Press, Baldock, UK
2. Bandinelli S, Di Nitto E, Fuggetta A (1996) Supporting cooperation in the SPADE-1 environment. IEEE Trans Software Eng 22:841-865
3. Bratthall L, Johansson E, Regnell B (2000) Is a design rationale vital when predicting change impact? A controlled experiment on software architecture evolution. In: Proc PROFES'00, 2nd International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, Oulu, Finland, 20-22 June
4. Brazier FMT, Van Langen PHG, Treur J (1997) A compositional approach to modelling design rationale. Art Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 11:125-139
5. Buckingham-Shum SJ, Hammond N (1994) Argumentation-based design rationale: what use at what cost? Human-Comp Studies 40:603-652
6. Canfora G, Casazza G, De Lucia A (2000) A design rationale based environment for cooperative maintenance. Int J Software Eng Knowledge Eng 10:627-645
7. Carroll JM, Moran TP (1991) Special issue on design rationale. Human-Comp Interact 6:197-442
8. Churchill EF, Trevor J, Bly S, Nelson L, Cubranic D (2000) Anchored conversations: chatting in the context of a document. In: Proc CHI2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Haue, April 1-6, ACM, pp 454-461
9. Clark HH, Brennan SE (1991) Grounding in communication. In: LB Resnick, JM Levine, SD Teasley (eds) Perspectives on socially shared cognition. American Psychological Society, Washington, DC, pp 127-149
10. Conklin JE, Burgess Yakemovic KC (1991) A process-oriented approach to design rationale. Human-Comput Interact 6:357-391
11. Conradi R, Hagaseth M, Larsen JO, Nguyen MN, Munch BP, Westby PH, Zhu W, Jacchert ML, Liu C (1994) EPOS: object-oriented and cooperative process modeling. In: Finkelstein A, Kramer J, Nuseibeh B (eds) Software process modeling and technology. Research Studies Press, Baldock, UK
12. Cubranic D, Booth KS (1999) Coordination in open-source software development. In: Proc 8th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, Palo Alto, Calif, 16-18 June, IEEE, pp 61-66
13. Concurrent versions system http://www.cvshome.org
14. Doppke JC, Heimbigner D, Wolf AL (1998) Software process modeling and execution within virtual environments. ACM Trans Software Eng Methodol 7:1-40
15. Engels G, Lewerentz C, Nagl M, Schafer W, Schurr A (1992) Building integrated software development environments. 1. Tool specification. ACM Trans Software Eng Methodol 1:135-167
16. Fadden K, Battles S (2002) Messaging for innovation: building the innovation infrastructure through messaging practices. Pitney Bowes, Stamford, USA http://www.usps.com/strategicdirection/_pdf/executiv.pdf
17. Fischer G, Lemke AC, McCall R (1991) Making argumentation serve design. Human-Comput Interact 6:393-419
18. Greif I, Seliger R, Weihl W (1992) A case study of CES: a distributed collaborative editing system implemented in Argus. IEEE Trans Software Eng 18:827-839
19. Grudin J (1994) Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Comm ACM 37:92-105
20. Hayes EE, McWherter D, Regli W, Sevy J, Zaychik V (2000) Software architecture to facilitate automated message recording and context annotation. In: Berry NM, Leif L (eds) Network intelligence: Internet-based manufacturing, Proc SPIE, vol 4208
21. Hollan J, Stornetta S (1992) Beyond being there. In: Proc ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'92), Monterey, Calif, 3-7 May, ACM, pp 119-125
22. Hong J, Toye G, Leifer LJ (1995) Personal electronic notebook with sharing. In: Proc Fourth Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE'95), Berkeley Springs, West Virg, 20-22 April, IEEE Computer Society, pp 88-94
23. Shipman FM III, McCall RJ (1997) Integrating different perspectives on design rationale: supporting the emergence of design rationale from design communication. Art Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 11:141-154
24. Kaiser GE, Dossick SE, Jiang W, Yang JJ (1997) An architecture for WWW-based hypercode environments. In: Proc 1997 International Conference on Software Engineering, Boston, 17-23 May, ACM, pp. 3-13
25. Kazman R, Bass L, Abowd G, Webb SM (1994) SAAM: a method for analyzing the properties of software architectures. In: Proc International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE16), Sorrento, Italy, May, pp 81-90
26. Lee J, Lai K (1991) What's in design rationale. Human-Comp Interaction 6:251-280
27. Mabogunje A, Leifer LJ (1997) Noun phrases as surrogates for measuring early phases of the mechanical design process. In: Proc 9th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (ASME/DETC), Sacramento, ASME
28. Mark W, Tyler S, McGuire J, Schlossberg J (1992) Commitment-based software development. IEEE Trans Software Eng 18:870-886
29. Monk S, Sommerville I, Pendaries JM, Durin B (1995) Supporting design rationale for system evolution. In: Schäfer W, Botella P (eds) Proc 5th European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC'95), Sitges, Spain, 25-28 September, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 307-323
30. Montangero C, Ambriola V (1994) OIKOS: constructing process-centered SDEs. In: Finkelstein A, Kramer J, Nuseibeh B (eds) Software process modeling and technology, Research Studies Press, Baldock, UK
31. Myers KL, Zumel NB, Garcia P (1999) Automated capture of rationale for the detailed design process. In: Uthurusamy R, Hayes-Roth B (eds) Eleventh Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Orlando, 18-22 July, AAAI, Menlo Park, Calif, pp 876-883
32. Pohl K, Weidenhaupt K, Domges R, Haumer P, Jarke M, Klamma R (1999) Prime - toward process-integrated modeling environments. ACM Trans Software Eng Methodol 8:343-410
33. http://www.postgresql.org
34. Ramesh B, Sengupta K (1995) Multimedia in a design rationale decision support system. Decision Support Syst 15:181-196
35. Regli WC, Hu X, Atwood M, Sun W (2000) A survey of design rationale systems: approaches, representation, capture and retrieval. Eng Comp 16:209-235
36. Richter H, Schuchhard P, Abowd GD (1999) Automated capture and retrieval of architectural rationale. In: Online Proc First Working IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA'99), San Antonio, Tex, 22-24 February, Kluwer: Academic, Dordrecht
37. Sproull L (1984) The nature of managerial attention. In: Sproull L, Larkey P (eds) Advances in information processing in organizations. JAI, Greenwich, Conn, pp 9-27
38. http://www.wonderworks.com/vm
39. Yen SJ, Fruchter R, Leifer L (1999) Facilitating tacit knowledge capture and reuse in conceptual design activities. In: Proc 11th Int Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Las Vegas, USA, 12-16 September, ASME, DETC99/DTM-8781
40. Zaychik V, Hewett T, Sevy J, Regli WC (2000) Evaluating collaborative engineering environments. In: IEEE Eighth International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE), Gaithersburg, Maryland, 14-16 June, pp 118-124
41. Zaychik V, Hewett T, Sevy J, Regli WC (2000) Issues in building and evaluating networked engineering environments. In: Cugini U, Wozny M (eds) Fourth IFIP WG 5.2 Workshop on Knowledge Intensive CAD (KIC-4), International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) Working Group 5.2, Parma, Italy, 22-24 May, pp 259-265