Can the weighted criteria improve our ability to capture a larger number of lupus patients into observational and interventional studies? A comparison with the American College of Rheumatology Criteria

Lupus

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 468-470

  Sanchez, M L ^a   Alarcon G S ^a,c   McGwin Jr , G ^b   Fessler, B J ^a   Kimberly, R P ^a  

^a University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^b Kentucky   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Classification; Criteria; Lupus; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODIFIED WEIGHTED CRITERIA; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RHEUMATOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS;

ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS, SYSTEMIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; RHEUMATOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038607732     PISSN: 09612033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0961203303lu369oa     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF et al. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1982; 25: 1271-1277.
2. Cohen AS, Reynolds WE, Franklin EC et al. Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Bull Rheum Dis 1971; 21: 643-648.
3. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40: 1725.
4. Greer JM, Panush RS. Incomplete lupus. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 2473-2476.
5. Calvo-Alén J, Bastian HM, Straaton KV, Burgard SI, Mikail IS, Alarcón GS. Identification of patient subsets among those presumptively diagnosed with, referred and/or followed up for systemic lupus erythematosus at a large tertiary care center. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 1475-1484.
6. Ganczarczyk L, Urowitz MB, Gladman DD. Latent lupus. J Rheumatol 1989; 16: 475-478.
7. Lom-Orta H, Alarcón-Segovia D, Díaz-Jouanen E. Systemic lupus erythematosus: differences between patients who do and who do not, fulfill classification criteria at the time of diagnosis. J Rheumatol 1980; 7: 831-837.
8. Swaak AJG, van de Brink H, Smeenk RJT et al. Incomplete lupus erythematosus: results of a multicentre study under the supervision of the EULAR standing committe on international clinical studies including therapeutic trials. Br Soc Rheumatol 2001; 40: 89-94.
9. Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, Tzavala V, Dafni U, Spanos E, Moutsopoulos HM. Clinical features and evolution of antinuclear antibody positive individuals in a rheumatology outpatient clinic. J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 886-891.
10. Clough JD, Elrazak M, Calabrese LH, Valenzuela R, Braun WB, Williams GW. Weighted criteria for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Intern Med 1984; 144: 281-285.
11. Costenbader KH, Mandl LA, Liang MH. Improving the utility of ACR criteria for clinical trials. Lupus 2001; 10: S117.
12. Reveille JD, Bartolucci A, Alarcón GS. Prognosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Negative impact of increasing age at onset, black race, and thrombocytopenia, as well as causes of death. Arthritis Rheum 1990; 33: 37-48.
13. Gulko PS, Reveille JD, Koopman WJ, Burgard SL, Bartolucci AA, Alarcón GS. Anticardiolipin antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical correlates, HLA associations, and impact on survival. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 1684-1693.
14. Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Goldsmith CH et al. The reliability of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40: 809-813.
15. Alarcón GS, McGwin G Jr, Ahn C et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups XIII: the 'weighted' criteria as predictors of damage. Lupus 2002; 11: 95-101.