Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy: A new petrofabric tool in migmatites

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Volumn 108, Issue 2, 2003, Pages

  Ferré, Eric C ^a   Teyssier, Christian ^b   Jackson, Mike ^b   Thill, James W ^b   Rainey, Emma S G ^b  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

AMS; Continental crust; Magnetic; Migmatite; Superior Province

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; CONTINENTAL CRUST; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MIGMATITE; PETROFABRIC;

MINNESOTA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038607662     PISSN: 21699313     EISSN: 21699356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Agar, S. M., and G. E. Lloyd, Deformation of Fe-Ti oxides in gabbroic shear zones from the MARK area, in Proc. Ocean Drill. Program Sci. Results, edited by M. Cannat et al., pp. 123-141, Ocean Drill. Program, College Station, Tex., 1997.
2. Atkinson, B. K., The kinetics of ore deformation: Its illustration and analysis by means of deformation-mechanism maps, Geol. Foeren. Stockholm Foerh., 99, 186-197, 1977.
3. Barraud, J., V. Gardien, P. Allemand, and P. Grandjean, Analog modelling of melt segregation and migration during deformation, Phys. Chem. Earth, Part A, 26, 317-323, 2001.
4. Bascou, J., G. Barruol, A. Vauchez, D. Mainprice, and M. Egydio-Silva, EBSD-measured lattice-preferred orientations and seismic properties of eclogites. Tectonophysics, 342, 61-80, 2001.
5. Bauer, R. L., Multiphase deformation in the Granite Falls-Montevideo area, Minnesota River Valley, in the Selected Studies of Archean Gneisses and Lower Proterozoic Rocks in the Southern Canadian Shield, Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap., edited by G. N. Hanson and G. B. Morey, pp. 1-17, 1980.
6. Blummenfeld, P., and J. L. Bouchez, Shear criteria in granite and migmatite deformed in the magmatic and solid states, J. Struct. Geol., 10, 361-372, 1988.
7. Borradaile, G. J., and M. Stupvavsky, Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility: Measurement schemes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 15, 1957-1960, 1995.
8. Borradaile, G. J., and B. Henry, Tectonic applications of the magnetic susceptibility and its anisotropy, Earth Sci. Rev., 42, 49-93, 1997.
9. Bouchez, J. L., Granite is never isotropic: An introduction to AMS studies of granitic rocks, in Granite: From Segregation of Melt to Emplacement Fabrics, Petrol. Struct. Geol., edited by J. L. Bouchez et al., pp. 95-112, Kluwer Acad., Norwell, Mass., 1997.
10. Bouchez, J.-L., Anisotropie de susceptibilité magnétique et fabrique des granites, C. R. Acad. Sci., 330, 1-14, 2000.
11. Brown, M., The generation, segregation, ascent and emplacement of granite magma: The migmatite-to-crustally-derived granite connection in thickened orogens, Earth Sci. Rev., 36, 83-130, 1994.
12. Brown, M. A. M. Brown, W. D. Carlson, and C. Denison, Topology of syntectonic melt-flow networks in the deep crust: Inferences from three dimensional images of leucosome geometry in migmatites, Am. Mineral., 84, 1793-1818, 1999.
13. Day, R., M. Fuller, and V. A. Schmidt, Hysteresis properties of titanomagnetites: Grain-size and compositional dependence, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 13, 260-267, 1977.
14. Etheridge, M. A., Differential stress magnitudes during regional deformation and metamorphism: Upper bound imposed by tensile fracturing, Geology, 11, 231-234, 1983.
15. Ferré, E., G. Gleizes, M. T. Djouadi, J. L. Bouchez, and F. X. O. Ugodulunwa, Drainage and emplacement of magmas along an inclined trans-current shear zone: Petrophysical evidence from a granite-charnockite pluton (Rahama, Nigeria), in Granite: From Segregation of Melt to Emplacement Fabrics, Petrol. Struct. Geol., edited by J. L. Bouchez et al., pp. 253-273, Kluwer Acad., Norwell, Mass., 1997.
16. Goldich, S. S., and J. L. Wooden, Origin of the Morton gneiss, southwestern Minnesota, part 3, Geochronology, Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap., 182, 77-94, 1980.
17. Goldich, S. S., J. L. Wooden, G. A. Ankenbauer Jr., T. M. Levy, and R. U. Suda, Origin of the Morton gneiss, southwestern Minnesota, part I, Lithology, Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap., 182, 45-56, 1980.
18. Grégoire, V., M. de Saint-Blanquat, A. Nédélec, and J. L. Bouchez, Shape anisotropy versus magnetic interactions of magnetite grains: Experiments and application to AMS in granitic rocks, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 2765-2768, 1995.
19. Grégoire, V., J. Darrozes, P. Gaillot, A. Nédélec, and P. Launeau, Magnetite grain shape fabric and distribution anisotropy vs rock magnetic fabric: A three-dimensional case study, J. Struct. Geol., 20, 937-944, 1998.
20. Hargraves, R. B., D. Johnson, and C. Y. Chan, Distribution anisotropy: The cause of AMS in igneous rocks?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 2193-2196, 1991.
21. Hopgood, A. M., Determination of Structural Successions in Migmatites and Gneisses, 346 pp., Kluwer Acad., Norwell, Mass., 1998.
22. Housen, B., B. A. van der Pluijm, and E. J. Essene, Plastic behavior of magnetite and high strains obtained from magnetic fabrics in the Parry Sound shear zone, Ontario, Greenville province, J. Struct. Geol., 17, 265-278, 1995.
23. Jelacute;nek, V., Statistical processing of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility measured on groups of speciments, Stud. Geophys. Geod., 22, 50-62, 1978.
24. Launeau, P., and P. Y. F. Robin, Fabric analysis using the intercept method. Tectonophysics, 267, 91-119, 1996.
25. McLellan, E. L., Problems of structural analysis in migmatite terrains, in Migmatites, Melting and Metamorphism, edited by M. P. Gribble and C. D. Atherton, pp. 299-302, Shiva, San Ramon, Calif., 1993.
26. Mehnert, K. R., Migmatites and the Origin of Granitic Rocks, 393 pp., Elsevier Sci., New York, 1968.
27. Nagata, T., Rock Magnetism, pp. 96-99, Maruzen, Tokyo, 1961.
28. Nielsen, B. V., and P. W. Weiblen, Mineral and rock compositions of mafic enclaves in the Morton gneiss, Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap., 182, 95-103, 1980.
29. Noltimier, H. C., Determining magnetic anisotropy of rocks with a spinner magnetometer giving in-phase and quadrature data output, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 4849-4854, 1971.
30. Partzsch, G. M., F. R. Schilling, and J. Arndt, The influence of partial melting on the electrical behavior of crustal rocks: Laboratory examinations, model calculations and geological interpretations, Tectonophysics, 317, 189-203, 2000.
31. Passchier, C. W., J. S. Myers, and A. Kröner, Field Geology of High-Grade Gneiss Terrains, 150 pp., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.
32. Rochette, P., Magnetic susceptibility of the rock matrix related to magnetic fabric studies, J. Struct. Geol., 9, 1015-1020, 1987.
33. Rochette, P., M. Jackson, and C. Aubourg, Rock magnetism and the interpretation of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility, Rev. Geophys., 30(3), 209-226, 1992.
34. Southwick, D. L., and V. W. Chandler, Block and shear-zone architecture of the Minnesota River valley subprovince: Implications for late Archean accretionary tectonics, Can. J. Earth Sci., 33, 831-847, 1996.
35. Stephenson, A., Distribution anisotropy: Two simple models for magnetic lineation and foliation, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 82, 49-53, 1994.
36. Syono, Y., Magnetic susceptibility of some rock forming silicate minerals such as amphiboles, biotites, cordierites and garnets, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 11, 85-93, 1960.
37. Tarling, D. H., and F. Hrouda, The Magnetic Anisotropy of Rocks, 1st ed., 217 pp., Chapman and Hall, New York, 1993.
38. van der Molen, I., and M. S. Paterson, Experimental deformation of partially melted granite, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 70, 299-318, 1979.
39. Vernon, R. H., and S. R. Paterson, Axial-surface leucosomes in anatectic migmatites, Tectonophysics, 335, 183-192, 2001.
40. Vigneresse, J. L., P. Barbey, and M. Cuney, Rheological transitions during partial melting and crystallization with application to felsic magma segregation and transfer, J. Petrol., 37(6), 1579-1600, 1996.
41. Wooden, J. L., S. S. Goldich, and N. H. Suhr, Origin of the Morton gneiss, southwestern Minnesota, part 2, Geochemistry, Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap., 182, 57-75, 1980.